wine-bugs September 2023

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
2606 discussions

[Bug 55572] New: kernel32:virtual - test_mapping(<anonymous>, SEC_COMMIT, TRUE) gets permission denied errors on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55572 Bug ID: 55572 Summary: kernel32:virtual - test_mapping(<anonymous>, SEC_COMMIT, TRUE) gets permission denied errors on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com kernel32:virtual - test_mapping(<anonymous>, SEC_COMMIT, TRUE) gets permission denied errors on macOS: virtual.c:3780: testing anonymous mapping flags 08000000 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 20: MapViewOfFile(0020/0024) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 21: MapViewOfFile(0020/0025) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 28: MapViewOfFile(0020/002c) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 29: MapViewOfFile(0020/002d) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 18: MapViewOfFile(0040/0022) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 19: MapViewOfFile(0040/0023) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 20: MapViewOfFile(0040/0024) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 21: MapViewOfFile(0040/0025) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 22: MapViewOfFile(0040/0026) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 23: MapViewOfFile(0040/0027) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 26: MapViewOfFile(0040/002a) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 27: MapViewOfFile(0040/002b) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 28: MapViewOfFile(0040/002c) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 29: MapViewOfFile(0040/002d) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 30: MapViewOfFile(0040/002e) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 31: MapViewOfFile(0040/002f) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 20: MapViewOfFile(0080/0024) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 21: MapViewOfFile(0080/0025) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 28: MapViewOfFile(0080/002c) failed 5 virtual.c:3892: Test failed: 29: MapViewOfFile(0080/002d) failed 5 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#kernel32:virtual Where 5 == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED 0x08000000 == SEC_COMMIT 0x01 == FILE_MAP_COPY 0x04 == FILE_MAP_READ or SECTION_MAP_READ 0x20 == FILE_MAP_EXECUTE or SECTION_MAP_EXECUTE_EXPLICIT These failures are systematic and only happen on macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 55571] New: ntdll:file - test_file_link_information() fails on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55571 Bug ID: 55571 Summary: ntdll:file - test_file_link_information() fails on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com ntdll:file - test_file_link_information() fails on macOS: file.c:2317: Test succeeded inside todo block: Link did not change casing on existing target file: got L"Foo69c8.tmp" See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ntdll:file The failure is systematic and only happens on macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). This is likely just another consequence of the lack of support for file change notification on macOS (see bug 12840 and bug 12854). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 12854] New: ntdll change.ok test fails in PC-BSD but not Linux
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12854 Summary: ntdll change.ok test fails in PC-BSD but not Linux Product: Wine Version: 0.9.60 Platform: PC OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Keywords: testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=12551) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12551) +file in git, bzip2 -9'ed Change.ok is full of failures in PC-BSD: change.c:117: Test failed: event should be ready change.c:119: Test failed: information wrong change.c:120: Test failed: information wrong change.c:124: Test failed: action wrong change.c:125: Test failed: len wrong change.c:126: Test failed: name wrong Total of 26. Attached is a +file log. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 18

[Bug 55550] New: ntdll:path - test_nt_names() gets NAME_INVALID instead of PATH_NOT_FOUND on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55550 Bug ID: 55550 Summary: ntdll:path - test_nt_names() gets NAME_INVALID instead of PATH_NOT_FOUND on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com ntdll:path - test_nt_names() gets NAME_INVALID instead of PATH_NOT_FOUND on macOS: path.c:728: Test failed: 24: got c0000034 / c000003a for (null) + L"\\??\\C:\\windows\\system32\\kernel32.dll\\foo" path.c:728: Test failed: 26: got c0000034 / c000003a for (null) + L"\\??\\C:\\windows\\system32\\Kernel32.Dll\\foo" path.c:728: Test failed: 50: got c0000034 / c000003a for L"\\??\\C:\\windows\\" + L"system32\\kernel32.dll\\foo" path.c:728: Test failed: 52: got c0000034 / c000003a for L"\\??\\C:\\windows\\" + L"system32\\Kernel32.Dll\\foo" See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ntdll:path The failure is systematic and only happens macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). This happens when a path component is a file instead of a directory. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 38095] New: Metatrader: doesn't respect charts sorting/sequency when restarted
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095 Bug ID: 38095 Summary: Metatrader: doesn't respect charts sorting/sequency when restarted Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: 23bene(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Wine 1.6 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS 32bit using Metatrader 4 vers. 4.00 Build 765 (12 Dec 2014) doesn't respect charts sorting/sequency when restarted. Eg.: if I sort charts alphabetically during my Metatrader session, it remain so sorted till I close it. When I open again for a new Metatrader session, I find charts completely shuffled!! I copypasted my order.wnd file (that contain my charts ordered) in my home/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Metatrader 4/profiles/my_name/ directory without having no one mt4 session opened. When I launch mt4 session, it doesn't follow charts order as written in my file and everytime I launch it again a new, random charts sequence is done. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 55066] New: user32:msg - test_button_messages() sometimes gets WM_SIZE instead of WM_SETFOCUS in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55066 Bug ID: 55066 Summary: user32:msg - test_button_messages() sometimes gets WM_SIZE instead of WM_SETFOCUS in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- user32:msg - test_button_messages() sometimes gets WM_SIZE instead of WM_SETFOCUS in Wine: msg.c:6897: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 4: the msg 0x0007 was expected, but got msg 0x0005 instead msg.c:6897: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 5: the msg 0x0138 was expected, but got msg 0x030f instead msg.c:6897: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 6: the msg 0x0111 was expected, but got msg 0x001c instead msg.c:6897: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 8: the msg 0x8000 was expected, but got msg 0x0086 instead msg.c:6897: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 9: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0000 - actual 0006 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#user32:msg This first happened on 2023-05-19 and since then it has been happening in about 4% of the runs. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 55567] New: comctl32:tooltips - test_track() fails on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55567 Bug ID: 55567 Summary: comctl32:tooltips - test_track() fails on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: comctl32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com comctl32:tooltips - test_track() fails on macOS: tooltips.c:903: Test failed: pos.left = 9 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#comctl32:tooltips The failure is systematic and only happens on macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 55564] New: user32:sysparams - test_WM_DISPLAYCHANGE() fails on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55564 Bug ID: 55564 Summary: user32:sysparams - test_WM_DISPLAYCHANGE() fails on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com user32:sysparams - test_WM_DISPLAYCHANGE() fails on macOS: sysparams.c:2499: Test failed: bpp 8: got WM_DISPLAYCHANGE bpp 32 sysparams.c:2499: Test failed: bpp 16: got WM_DISPLAYCHANGE bpp 32 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#user32:sysparams The failures are systematic and only happen on macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). They probably happen because some display modes are not supported on macOS (see also bug 55559). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 55563] New: psapi:psapi_main - test_QueryWorkingSetEx() fails on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55563 Bug ID: 55563 Summary: psapi:psapi_main - test_QueryWorkingSetEx() fails on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: psapi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com psapi:psapi_main - test_QueryWorkingSetEx() fails on macOS: psapi_main.c:1165: Test failed: exe expected Valid=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test failed: exe expected Win32Protection=2 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1177: Test failed: exe expected Shared=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1177: Test failed: exe,noaccess expected Shared=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1165: Test succeeded inside todo block: exe,readonly1 expected Valid=0 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test succeeded inside todo block: exe,readonly1 expected Win32Protection=0 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1177: Test failed: exe,readonly1 expected Shared=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1165: Test failed: exe,readonly2 expected Valid=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test failed: exe,readonly2 expected Win32Protection=2 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1177: Test failed: exe,readonly2 expected Shared=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1165: Test failed: valloc,read expected Valid=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test failed: valloc,read expected Win32Protection=4 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1165: Test failed: valloc,write expected Valid=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test failed: valloc,write expected Win32Protection=4 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1165: Test succeeded inside todo block: valloc,readwrite1 expected Valid=0 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test succeeded inside todo block: valloc,readwrite1 expected Win32Protection=0 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1165: Test failed: valloc,readwrite2 expected Valid=1 but got 0 psapi_main.c:1169: Test failed: valloc,readwrite2 expected Win32Protection=4 but got 0 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#psapi:psapi_main These failures are systematic and only happen on macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). It looks like the reason is that get_working_set_ex() is effectively unimplemented since HAVE_LIBPROCSTAT is not defined on macOS and the /proc filesystem is not present. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 55562] New: ntdll:info - test_query_process_vm() fails on macOS
by WineHQ Bugzilla 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55562 Bug ID: 55562 Summary: ntdll:info - test_query_process_vm() fails on macOS Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com ntdll:info - test_query_process_vm() fails on macOS: info.c:1909: Test failed: Expected a WorkingSetSize > 0 info.c:1910: Test failed: Expected a PagefileUsage > 0 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ntdll:info The failures are systematic and only happen on macOS (see Remi's rbernon-macos-* cloud test machines). It looks like the reason is that get_process_vm_counters() is effectively unimplemented since HAVE_LIBPROCSTAT is not defined on macOS and the /proc filesystem is not present. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs September 2023