August 2026 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 50109] conhost: write_console beep doesn't produce a beep

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50109 Barath Kannan <barathrk11(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |barathrk11(a)gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Barath Kannan <barathrk11(a)gmail.com> --- Fixed by this MR: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/11469 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 55775] game made from unity is not play in-game video.

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #45 from Stian Low <wineryyyyy(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #41) > point out, we desperately need new contributors. For the record I've applied to join Codeweavers to help at a more full-time but was told I need more gitlab volume/activity to qualify. I'm still open to joining but I seem to be considered unworthy for one reason or another. Satisfying gitlab volume criteria is more difficult for me because I've chosen to focus on less trivial long-standing d3d bugs vs other much lower hanging fruit. (Although some of my trivial low hanging fruit seem not to be merged either: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/11083#note_146454) I only have so much free time so I choose to focus on what aligns with my highest priorities/interests in d3d/graphics and what I calculated as having highest impact. Haven video bug seems to meet that criteria and MR-11398 as a trivial breakthrough. I understand d3d may take higher level of scrutiny/vetting compared to other modules and that newcomers/outsiders require a higher level of proof but it does seem to stall me a bit moving forward onto fixing other bugs and whatever gitlab volume may need to be satisfied to be considered a worthy candidate. Perhaps its unwise/stubborn of me to stay focused on fixing these bug since it impedes potentially increasing gitlab volume elsewhere and with other lower hanging fruit but I consider fixing these bugs to have higher weight regardless of it only counting as 1 commit toward whatever gitlab volume needs to be satisfied. A pound of feathers weighs the same as a pound of bricks but may not have the same impact. I choose brick. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 55775] game made from unity is not play in-game video.

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #44 from Chunhao Hung <l12436.tw(a)gmail.com> --- I just want to share my opinion. I understand that the MR-11398 workaround might break some applications, so I think it makes sense to make it opt-in through a config option, either an environment variable or a registry setting. Personally, I would prefer an environment variable. This workaround seems to help video playback in a number of Unity games, so I think it is nice to have. But I also agree that it may reduce the incentive to fix the real underlying issue. Because of that, I think it should only be treated as a temporary workaround, and it should be removable at any time once the proper implementation is done. Maybe it could also be documented on the Wine wiki with a clear note that it is temporary. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 60122] Super Solvers: Gizmos & Gadgets won't start

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60122 Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch --- Comment #1 from Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> --- Patch sent: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/11568 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 55775] game made from unity is not play in-game video.

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #43 from Stian Low <wineryyyyy(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #41) > I apologize, I seem to have misread the intent behind your message. I should > have been more gracious. No worries. I've seen how badly other reporters misbehave sometimes so I can see how my bluntness may have triggered association with them. > No, it's broadly true; the phrasing seemed more accusatory (i.e. that > lagging behind is intentional, rather than a consequence of CW's choices to > prioritize other work) but I gather this was unintentional. Thanks again for clarifying. I was not implying it would necessarily be a bad thing if the lag was intentional to give Steam an edge during partnerships. If that's not the case then I'll consider my efforts more worthwhile and not in conflict with a strategy unknown to me. > To be clear, when I say they are lower priority I don't mean that they are > *low* priority. I would rate shared resources as the #2 priority, after > "finish Damavand", and I'm not even sure that's right. Also to clarify, > that's just priorities as in "what I personally work on". Review of someone > else's patches is always the highest priority. I know it doesn't seem that > way, and I apologize; I really don't want to be as slow with review as I am. I know folks are busy and not all reviews are the same. MR-11398 review is more trivial and comes down to a simple decision. MR-10567 is far less trivial (and vital to finish Damavand) and I've let reviewers know I understand that more thorough review may take more time: - https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/10567#note_146816 > I'm sorry you feel that your fixes are being automatically rejected; that's Only MR-11398 seemed like an automatic rejection. > The only patch I've considered rejecting is 11398, because (1) it doesn't > actually encourage anyone to fix the bug properly; in fact it reduces the > incentive; (2) it's rather indirect for a workaround, compared to other > workarounds we have in d3d; (3) it's not clear to me it's going to be that > hard. But I also see the point of fixing a larger class of applications now, > and it's simple enough too, so it's hard to decide. I agree it may reduce incentive to fix the bug but that would imply because its considered at least partially fixed. I intend to fix the other bug via MR-11404 regardless which has its own more edge use cases that MR-11398 does not fix but helps clarify. MR-11398 would enable replies to reporters to simply test if videos are fixed via `WINE_D3D_CONFIG=no_create_flags=0x800` and if so then it clarifies the problem. Otherwise bugs become clouded with the rest of the sea of related/duplicate bugs. MR-11398 may give some folks incentive to use wine video workarounds vs DXVK until D3D flag is no longer required to force it anymore via MR-11404. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 60122] Super Solvers: Gizmos & Gadgets won't start

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60122 Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://archive.org/downloa | |d/super-solvers-gizmos-gadg | |ets/Super%20Solvers%20Gizmo | |s%20%26%20Gadgets.iso Keywords| |download -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 60122] New: Super Solvers: Gizmos & Gadgets won't start

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60122 Bug ID: 60122 Summary: Super Solvers: Gizmos & Gadgets won't start Product: Wine Version: 11.14 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)list.winehq.org Reporter: alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Distribution: --- The game installs without error, but when it starts it displays an error dialog that says "The MIDI driver for your sound card could not be found. Make sure that the correct sound card drivers are installed before restarting Gizmos & Gadgets! Consult you sound card's documentation for additional information." Then it exits. Creating a MIDI device with `fluidsynth -l -s -i -aalsa -o audio.alsa.device=default /usr/share/soundfonts/FluidR3_GS.sf2` (and confirming with `aconnect -o` that it was created) does not help. Creating an empty file C:\windows\system\midimap.cfg gets past the error. sha256sum 'Super Solvers Gizmos & Gadgets.iso' 7b9d203cf31f27024b36dc3f9545135080791d73f12d1ed2e37e41852fbd7ccd -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 55775] game made from unity is not play in-game video.

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #42 from Stian Low <wineryyyyy(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #40) > > Which part is passive aggressive and should be left off? Thanks for clarifying. I was being blunt which may have come off as aggressive but not intended as in some passive way. I was explaining to reporter that I'll try to get these bugs fixed but I have spent considerable time tracking the history of this particular bug to better understand how best to fix it which includes: 1. Attempts by some codeweavers around the time Haven bug was originally reported back in 2020 to commit what was approved for proton but rejected for vanilla - https://list.winehq.org/hyperkitty/list/wine-devel@list.winehq.org/message/… 2. MR-11398 which is a far more trivial fix/workaround but also at risk of being rejected - https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/11398#note_146433 So I may have over speculated about why dxvk exists. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 55775] game made from unity is not play in-game video.

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #41 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Stian Low from comment #39) > (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #38) > > Therefore I'd appreciate leaving off the passive-aggressive comments. > > Which part is passive aggressive and should be left off? I apologize, I seem to have misread the intent behind your message. I should have been more gracious. > > As I've told you before, Wine lags behind DXVK because we have had at most > > one developer working on Direct3D, often less than full time, for the past > > several years. > > Thanks for clarifying d3d lags due to limited resources. I'm trying to fix > the lags. > > Forgive me if my guess that limited resource allocation may due to business > strategy is considered offensive to you. It seems a legitimate decision to > be made given potential steam partnerships and resource allocations there. No, it's broadly true; the phrasing seemed more accusatory (i.e. that lagging behind is intentional, rather than a consequence of CW's choices to prioritize other work) but I gather this was unintentional. > Perhaps I misunderstood your reply that "priorities are difficult" as these > d3d bugs are considered lower priority. To be clear, when I say they are lower priority I don't mean that they are *low* priority. I would rate shared resources as the #2 priority, after "finish Damavand", and I'm not even sure that's right. Also to clarify, that's just priorities as in "what I personally work on". Review of someone else's patches is always the highest priority. I know it doesn't seem that way, and I apologize; I really don't want to be as slow with review as I am. > I'm doing what I'm able to fix/workaround bugs as a newcomer/outsider. > Perhaps not auto rejecting other's fixes/workarounds may satisfy some level > of what may be considered fixes especially when otherwise harmless and > provide clarity. I'm sorry you feel that your fixes are being automatically rejected; that's not at all my intent, and, to be overly honest, I'm specifically hesitant to reject anything from a new contributor for fear of driving them off. As you point out, we desperately need new contributors. The only patch I've considered rejecting is 11398, because (1) it doesn't actually encourage anyone to fix the bug properly; in fact it reduces the incentive; (2) it's rather indirect for a workaround, compared to other workarounds we have in d3d; (3) it's not clear to me it's going to be that hard. But I also see the point of fixing a larger class of applications now, and it's simple enough too, so it's hard to decide. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026

[Bug 55775] game made from unity is not play in-game video.

by WineHQ Bugzilla

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #40 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- > Which part is passive aggressive and should be left off? > If keeping wine behind DXVK is a business strategy then perhaps its > considered a waste of time to try to fix these bugs. > Perhaps dxvk exists because the dev also had difficulty getting these bugs > fixed and decided splitting dxvk as separate effort was more worthwhile > which steam also considered worth funding independently. Must be nice to be > fed for such hard effort.(In reply to Stian Low from comment #39) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Aug. 4, 2026