http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7337
joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> 2008-02-22 23:46:53 ---
Closing....
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7337
joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> 2008-02-22 23:46:16 ---
bug fixed in current git
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7817
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xenarulz(a)tiscali.it
--- Comment #17 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-02-22 22:30:32 ---
*** Bug 11686 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8225
--- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-22 19:50:07 ---
The guide is a wiki, you're free to edit it to make it easier to read. What
wasn't covered in the guide that you needed help on?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6745
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Jakobi <liquid.acid(a)gmx.net> 2008-02-22 19:36:02 ---
Thanks Roderick for testing this.
As we seem to be stuck here I wrote the developer of the UT renderer (which is
the same used for deus ex) a mail asking for his help. As he's done the work on
the sourcecode of the renderer he can maybe give us some hints about the
problem we're encountering here.
I report back as soon as he writes back.
Greets,
Tobias
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8225
Colin <cmckaydubbo(a)yahoo.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |julliard(a)winehq.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8225
--- Comment #3 from Colin <cmckaydubbo(a)yahoo.com.au> 2008-02-22 18:53:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > The AppDB indicates that fireworks 8 is OK in wine 0.9.51, but not in 0.9.53+.
> >
> > However, although the program opens OK, when an attempt is made to open any
> > image the error message appear: "not enough memory".
> >
> > It seems like the later versions of wine handled the memory differently???
> >
> > (I am using a fully registered version, but I don't think it should make any
> > difference).
> >
>
> Can you run a regression test:
> http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting
>
I am new to this regression testing thing. The article helped though I needed
help to get through it.
The final output is:
2143dee78a0acf8be8c07062e84cc12ef18ef7cb is first bad commit
commit 2143dee78a0acf8be8c07062e84cc12ef18ef7cb
Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>
Date: Fri Jan 4 14:24:59 2008 +0100
mountmgr.sys: Create disk devices for all configured drives.
:040000 040000 83838416a46ff7bce80f10a0db9ce2b51197180b
82531f7db8b87d1bebb4989d5131241a9d5dc88b M dlls
Does this help?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2398
--- Comment #223 from rich <pagosadump(a)yahoo.com> 2008-02-22 18:15:00 ---
(In reply to comment #222)
> The complicated thing is that not all apps with a 3d view use GL client / child
> windows. They can implement their own windowed rendering mechanism (e.g. by
> copying some offscreen buffer to the screen). Further not all drivers support
> our child window rendering method YET. Nvidia's drivers support it well and
> second recent versions of the opensource intel drivers should work too. Rich
> your issue is likely driver related.
>
Perhaps your right I should try to track down the methods that glscene(open
source pascal/c opengl implementation) developers use. As for the driver, no, I
have used both the latest intel drivers for fedora. All other opengl apps I've
tested work perfectly. However regression testing has made a huge difference as
I now have it working again. It is a bit slower than when it randomly worked
under 0.9.52 but at least it works and really that's all I care to see.
Working. Forget the fluff it used to work.
> I plan to close this bug soon. Applications that remain to suffer from issues
> like this, should be handled in application specific bugs because it isn't a
> generic issue anymore.
>
Seems pretty generic to me when an open source library for c and pascal fails.
Did you actually try any of the demos or are you just shooting to kill? Just
kidding ;). I'm sure since I'm not a wine dev I miss all the juicey tidbits.
BTW most of these demos compile successfully under both wine/lazarus and
wine/delphi 6. The really strange thing to me is the randomness in 0.9.52 about
1 out of every 100 times everything was flawless ... the rest of the time
nothing at all. To me that shouts wine problem... and since it worked sometimes
shouldn't it just always work?
Forgive my lack of windows knowledge I barely know anything about it since I
haven't used it in over 12 years.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4767
Christoph Kappel <unexist(a)dorfelite.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |unexist(a)dorfelite.net
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.