wine-bugs

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
158886 discussions

[Bug 57595] New: Login repeated requested to submit bugs
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57595 Bug ID: 57595 Summary: Login repeated requested to submit bugs Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dav75uk(a)yahoo.co.uk CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- It doesn't seem to remember the login session (on firefox at least) when submitting bugs and screenshots. Cookie issue? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 12091] New: out of place text on bugzilla component description page
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12091 Summary: out of place text on bugzilla component description page Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: thestig(a)google.com I can't seem to find the change for this in bugzilla.git... On http://bugs.winehq.org/enter_bug.cgi, someone added the text: <-- You probably want to use that link there! Wine bugs. Submit bugs related to Wine here. <-- Use this if in doubt! but it also appears on this page: http://bugs.winehq.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Wine which doesn't make any sense. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 58491] New: Flickering on video-surveilance-app is back
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58491 Bug ID: 58491 Summary: Flickering on video-surveilance-app is back Product: Wine Version: 10.12 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: andreas.franz(a)arcor.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 78948 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=78948 started from terminal Flickering on viewing a camera stream with activated hardware accelerated d3d11 setting is back. Desktop picture and camera picture is swapping. It was gone with 10.0 stable - it's back with 10.12 (maybe some versions earlier). Software rendering works still fine. regards, Andy -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 58509] New: AppDB solution to redundant query and storage of Bugzilla versions list per user session
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58509 Bug ID: 58509 Summary: AppDB solution to redundant query and storage of Bugzilla versions list per user session Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: wineryyyyy(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Spawned from merge request addressing bug report: https://gitlab.winehq.org/winehq/appdb/-/merge_requests/23 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58471 Bug Link Queue is broken @jnewman raised server side concerns about redundantly querying and storing Bugzilla version per user session. A quick fix patch is currently in place to resolve the 500 error, but a better solution that queries and caches the Bugzilla versions server-wide and shared between user sessions was requested as a more optimal solution. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 53257] New: Emacs 28.1 is unusable
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53257 Bug ID: 53257 Summary: Emacs 28.1 is unusable Product: Wine Version: 7.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: EmilySeville7cf(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72636 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72636 screenshot of console emacs I install Emacs 28.1 from here (http://mirror.tochlab.net/pub/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-28/) emacs-28.1-installer.exe and run it via "C:\Program Files\Emacs\emacs-28.1\bin\runemacs.exe" ". When I use GUI version of Emacs it's window is moved to the left upper corner when I press any button. Workaround: maximize window size and use Emacs. When I use console Emacs version (emacs -nw) from wine cmd I can do nothing at all. Any Emacs shortcut breaks interface. For instance I've tried use "Ctrl+N" and obtain result on the screenshot. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 58474] New: "Importance" should link to the Severity list
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58474 Bug ID: 58474 Summary: "Importance" should link to the Severity list Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 URL: https://bugs.winehq.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- When clicking on "Importance" in the Bugzilla form it directs to https://bugs.winehq.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#importance but this doesn't really help a user. It should point to the Severity list: “Severity This field describes the impact of a bug. blocker Blocks development and/or testing work critical Critical problem that prevents all applications from working” and so on... I assumed this would be an easy change but I cannot find the code in the Bugzilla git that does this. Even if I could find it, the page uses a mix of <a name='bug_severity'> and <dt id='bug_severity'> for different parts of the page, the former being deprecated. Are these controlled by a config file? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 41825] New: Typo in "Comments Disabled"
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41825 Bug ID: 41825 Summary: Typo in "Comments Disabled" Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: plata(a)mailbox.org Distribution: --- "Comments for this application have be disabled becuase there are no maintainers." -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 46624] New: StarCraft: Remastered Edition disabled Monitors, Gamma Correction and Real-Time Lightning configuration
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46624 Bug ID: 46624 Summary: StarCraft: Remastered Edition disabled Monitors, Gamma Correction and Real-Time Lightning configuration Product: Wine-staging Version: 4.0 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: linards.liepins(a)gmail.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 63525 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=63525 screenshot Attaching Screenshot. Logs not provided as I am using Battle.net Launcher. Distro: Fedora 29 x64 System details / Graphics: Device-1: AMD Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590] vendor: XFX Pine driver: amdgpu v: kernel bus ID: 01:00.0 chip ID: 1002:67df Display: x11 server: Fedora Project X.org 1.20.3 driver: amdgpu compositor: gnome-shell v: 3.30.2 resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz OpenGL: renderer: Radeon RX 580 Series (POLARIS10 DRM 3.27.0 4.20.6-200.fc29.x86_64 LLVM 7.0.1) v: 4.5 Mesa 18.3.3 direct render: Yes NOTE: Mesa upgraded from Mesa 18.2.8 to 18.3.3 via https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petrb/mesa/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 53

[Bug 56246] New: Regarding the color depth of BMP in the SavePicture method: the value is unstable.
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56246 Bug ID: 56246 Summary: Regarding the color depth of BMP in the SavePicture method: the value is unstable. Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: win32u Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: taka(a)bahamut7.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 75953 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75953 Difference in color depth between Wine and Windows Thank you for the great software. In Windows 10/11, the SavePicture method saves in "24-bit color" even if the display's color setting is "32-bit color". In Wine, if the display's color setting is "32bit color", the picture is saved in "32bit color" and the Windows software throws an error. In Debian, for some reason, it is saved with the value "0". Due to this difference, some software may not work. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 58122] New: WSAENOTSOCK error when calling winsock.Send() on duplicated socket
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58122 Bug ID: 58122 Summary: WSAENOTSOCK error when calling winsock.Send() on duplicated socket Product: Wine-staging Version: 10.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: digitman63(a)gmail.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Process A creates a listening socket, accepts an incoming connection, and obtains a socket handle hSock. Process A spawns Process B with the InheritHandles flag, passing its own ProcessID and the socket handle hSock as command-line arguments. Process B calls OpenProcess() to get a handle hSrcProcess for the given ProcessID, then duplicates hSock into hDupSock using DuplicateHandle(hSrcProcess, hSock, GetCurrentProcess(), &hDupSock, ...); Process B successfully receives data from the duplicated socket using winsock.recv(hDupSock, ...). Process B attempts to send data via winsock.send(hDupSock, ...), but the call fails with WSAENOTSOCK (10038) ("Socket operation on non-socket"). Process B then tries sending the same data using kernel32.WriteFile(hDupSock, ...), and this operation succeeds. Why does send() fail while WriteFile() works on the same duplicated handle? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
15889
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs