December 2002 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: WinXP Test Oddities (Changed Test Results!!)

by David Miller

Sorry if this appears on the list twice. I sent from the wrong address the first time and messages seem to not appear on wine-devel unless I send from the address I have subscribed. Ok, I've rebooted and done advapi32_test.exe registry again. It now seems to hand halfway through the test. Here is the output on WinXP Pro: C:\winetests>advapi32_test.exe registry registry.c:80: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:81: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:94: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:95: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry.c:108: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:109: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry.c:122: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:123: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:134: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 registry.c:135: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 registry.c:136: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:137: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:138: Test failed: value is 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of Test registry.c:139: Test failed: data is 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of foobar registry.c:155: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:156: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:169: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:170: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:182: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 registry.c:183: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:184: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:185: Test failed: value is not 'Test' registry.c:195: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 registry.c:196: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 registry.c:197: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:198: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:199: Test failed: value is not 'Test' registry.c:200: Test failed: data is not 'foobar' At this point it seems to stop responding and advapi32_test.exe is eating 99% CPU. Of course it could be my system that is in error. I then ran the tests on my laptop, running WinXP home edition. I receive only 3 errors there. The output follows. C:\winetests>advapi32_test.exe registry registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 3 failures. Note that I downloaded new test binaries for these tests after finding the test hung on WinXP Pro. This did not seem to have any effect on the results. At 05:39 PM 12/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I ran the advapi32_test registry again today, and only received 3 >errors: > >h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set >to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' >h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to >'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' >h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set >to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' > >This seems very strange to me. I ran the test at first because I thought >it might have been a matter of long file names, but then when I moved it >back I found it wasn't, there was just something weird happening >instead. > >I'll try to reproduce the other errors tonight if I can, and if I am >successful I will post the results to the wine-devel group. > >David Miller, you also received 31 errors for this test, yes? Could you >test again straight after a computer reboot? > >Thanks, >Kye Lewis > >================ >You can reach me at: >kyethespy(a)liquid2k.com at most times >lew01(a)mcsc.vic.edu.au from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday >lewislan(a)net2000.com.au is an alternative email

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Conformance tests on WinNT

by Dimitrie O. Paun

On December 11, 2002 09:14 am, Tom Wickline wrote: > Were down to ( _1_ ) Win98SE Anyone ?? And what about Win95? -- Dimi.

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: SafeDisc 2 support ?

by Zsolt Rizsanyi

On Wednesday 11 December 2002 15:04, Steven Edwards wrote: > --- Tom Wickline <twickline2(a)triad.rr.com> wrote: > > Does Current wine support SafeDisc 2 ? > > If not when will it ? > > There were some patches for a SafeDisc driver that might violate the DMCA > so they were never accepted and if I remeber right it didnt support SD2. It very probably does not violate DMCA, but 'only' copyright. So with a clean room implementation there is a chance that it will be included. At least this was conclusion from the last discussion. And yes it did not support SD2. Tough it should be not hard to implement support, if you have a program with SD2. If you are interested, then you should look at list archives and all the threads where Laurent Pinchart participated. AFAIK he was only working on this and related issues in wine. You can use Google's advanced search option to search the archives (by specifying the site.) Regards Zsolt

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: WinXP Test Oddities (Changed Test Results!!)

by Dave

Ok, I've rebooted and done advapi32_test.exe registry again. It now seems to hand halfway through the test. Here is the output on WinXP Pro: C:\winetests>advapi32_test.exe registry registry.c:80: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:81: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:94: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:95: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry.c:108: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:109: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry.c:122: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:123: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:134: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 registry.c:135: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 registry.c:136: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:137: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:138: Test failed: value is 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of Test registry.c:139: Test failed: data is 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of foobar registry.c:155: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:156: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:169: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:170: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:182: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 registry.c:183: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:184: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:185: Test failed: value is not 'Test' registry.c:195: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 registry.c:196: Test failed: val_count set to 5 instead of 4 registry.c:197: Test failed: data_count set to 48 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:198: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:199: Test failed: value is not 'Test' registry.c:200: Test failed: data is not 'foobar' At this point it seems to stop responding and advapi32_test.exe is eating 99% CPU. Of course it could be my system that is in error. I then ran the tests on my laptop, running WinXP home edition. I receive only 3 errors there. The output follows. C:\winetests>advapi32_test.exe registry registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 3 failures. Note that I downloaded new test binaries for these tests after finding the test hung on WinXP Pro. This did not seem to have any effect on the results. At 05:39 PM 12/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I ran the advapi32_test registry again today, and only received 3 >errors: > >h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set >to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' >h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to >'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' >h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set >to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' > >This seems very strange to me. I ran the test at first because I thought >it might have been a matter of long file names, but then when I moved it >back I found it wasn't, there was just something weird happening >instead. > >I'll try to reproduce the other errors tonight if I can, and if I am >successful I will post the results to the wine-devel group. > >David Miller, you also received 31 errors for this test, yes? Could you >test again straight after a computer reboot? > >Thanks, >Kye Lewis > >================ >You can reach me at: >kyethespy(a)liquid2k.com at most times >lew01(a)mcsc.vic.edu.au from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday >lewislan(a)net2000.com.au is an alternative email

Dec. 11, 2002

RE: SafeDisc 2 support ?

by Patrik Stridvall

> --- Tom Wickline <twickline2(a)triad.rr.com> wrote: > > Does Current wine support SafeDisc 2 ? > > If not when will it ? > > There were some patches for a SafeDisc driver that might > violate the DMCA so they were never > accepted and if I remeber right it didnt support SD2. Correct, it didn't support SafeDisc 2. However I think that at least part of it was accepted. Anyway the reason that some part was not not accepted was not DMCA related. What the DMCA says is bad enough however there is no reason to claim that the DMCA says thing that it doesn't. Any implementation of SafeDisc in Wine would not be PRIMARILY designed as a circumvention device through any remotely reasonable definition of circumvention device and in addition to that PRIMARILY designed needs to be proven as well. SafeDisc simply tries to assure that the CD in the drive is not a copy. Nothing more, nothing less. Please people, don't let DMCA paranoia reach new heights.

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Conformance tests on WinNT

by Tom Wickline

James K Whiting wrote: >>>I don't think that anyone's posted the results of the conformance tests >>>as run on NT. >> >>There has been no post on 98SE and ME.. >>Anyone want to Volinteer ?? >> >>Francos has made it verry simple to do :)) >> >>Tom > > > I have access to Windows ME. Where are the tests and instructions? > > James > Great .. I see Tony has already sent the Info. And Dimi has added you to the list of testers. Were down to ( _1_ ) Win98SE Anyone ?? Tom

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: SafeDisc 2 support ?

by Steven Edwards

--- Tom Wickline <twickline2(a)triad.rr.com> wrote: > Does Current wine support SafeDisc 2 ? > If not when will it ? There were some patches for a SafeDisc driver that might violate the DMCA so they were never accepted and if I remeber right it didnt support SD2. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Dec. 11, 2002

SafeDisc 2 support ?

by Tom Wickline

Does Current wine support SafeDisc 2 ? If not when will it ? Tom

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Wine, Windows.Forms on Linux, GC and segfaults.

by Marcus Meissner

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:41:34PM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Hello, > > With the help of Hans Boehm, I have been tracking the problems we > have to run the Windows.Forms code with GC enabled. Turns out that the > problem is not the Boehm code at all, it just exposes a problem that > might be happening elsewhere. > > The problem is that by the time that Wine has been initialized, > using setjmp/longjmp will always lead to a crash. The code in pthreads > that performs the longjmp will first try to invoke the pthread cleanup > routines, and then invoke longjmp. This never happens. > > In the particular case of Mono, I added a small bit of code before > calling into Boehm's GC, and then I run my app like this: > > wine monostub.exe.so > > The code snippet is: > > jmp_buf buf; > > printf ("Here\n"); > if (setjmp (buf) == 0){ > printf ("before\n"); > longjmp (buf, 1); > } else { > printf ("after\n"); > } > > The code should display: > > Here > before > after > > But with Wine, I get a crash inside longjmp, after the "before" is > printed out. I get the Wine Console with the stack trace, but I can not > copy/paste from it, so I have included a screenshot of it. You currently cannot use the wine libraries together with -lpthread. WINE already overwrites and reimplements several pthread_ functions which probably leads to internal confusion and the crash above. Difficult to solve :/ Ciao, Marcus

Dec. 11, 2002

RE: Wine, Windows.Forms on Linux, GC and segfaults.

by Patrik Stridvall

> The problem is that by the time that Wine has been initialized, > using setjmp/longjmp will always lead to a crash. The code > in pthreads > that performs the longjmp will first try to invoke the pthread cleanup > routines, and then invoke longjmp. This never happens. You can't and needn't link with -lpthread. Wine has its own pthread implmentation. I tried your included code and it works just fine unless you link with -lpthread, then it crashes in the same way as in your attached picture. But then you should never link Wine with -lpthread so that is not really a bug. Of course Wine pthread implementation it not in any way complete so some function might be missing and some might only be only partially implemented and of course some might be incorrectly implemented. So please try again without linking with -lpthread.

Dec. 11, 2002

winelib + unicode

by Martin Wilck

wouldn't it be nice to have winemaker-generated sources automatically add "-fshort-wchar" to the C compiler options? To make this robust, one could write a configure test for it. Martin -- Martin Wilck Phone: +49 5251 8 15113 Fujitsu Siemens Computers Fax: +49 5251 8 20409 Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 mailto:Martin.Wilck(a)Fujitsu-Siemens.com D-33106 Paderborn http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Wine, Windows.Forms on Linux, GC and segfaults.

by Steven Edwards

> I was wondering if it would be possible to just "link" against the > Wine library instead of having to create a stub application to run from? The way linking works in winelib is kinda odd with the usage of the *.spec that it seems this is not possible. There was some disscussion on this a while back and certain changes that would be needed to LD but I think those might also have been for PE support. If I remember right this has something to do not only with LD but with alot of the magic wineserver works and hence just linking your application to a winelib library would not include all of the support wineserver provides. The rule seems to be its impossible to just -lwine your application. Wine is approaching 0.9 soon so once we hit 1.x then we should have a stable ABI/API which will make sharing the dlls a lot easyer if you come up with a new loading/linking method for mono rather then the winebuild system and its more interesting "features" Thanks Steven __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Dec. 11, 2002

any one have XIM support patch?

by liuspider

hello everyone: I just working hard to improve / implement the XIM support in wine based on the work of Mike McCormack. His original patch support Japanese, thus I think mime will work with japanese too. While I heared that there was a patch for korean XIM support, I think I'd better check with it to ensure my patch support korean too. Anyone know / has it? Could you send me a copy? I am Chinese, so now I only test my patch with Chinese input method. thanks liuspider

Dec. 11, 2002

wineoss/wavemap and i810 sound cards

by Francois Gouget

Here's the problem: apparently i810 sound cards (and the corresponding OSS drivers) only accept 48kHz sound in 16 bit stereo. So if an application uses winmm to play a sound in any other format, winmm has to use the wave mapper to do the conversion to that format. But msacm refuses to do a conversion to 48kHz sound because that sampling rate is not in the 'supported formats' list: see around line 870 of 'dlls/msacm/pcmconverter.c'. Hence the attached patch to pcmconverter. The changes in wavemap.c are just so that we at least try to see if we could convert to that sampling rate. However, why only support conversion between these specific formats? Why not support anything between 100 and 100000Hz for instance? That would nicely match the range returned by DirectSound... Does this patch look ok? Should I rewrite it using the above range instead? (Or rather, why should I not rewrite it that way?) -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Index: dlls/msacm/pcmconverter.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/msacm/pcmconverter.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 pcmconverter.c --- dlls/msacm/pcmconverter.c 2 Dec 2002 18:10:59 -0000 1.13 +++ dlls/msacm/pcmconverter.c 11 Dec 2002 02:54:56 -0000 @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ {1, 8, 11025}, {2, 8, 11025}, {1, 16, 11025}, {2, 16, 11025}, {1, 8, 22050}, {2, 8, 22050}, {1, 16, 22050}, {2, 16, 22050}, {1, 8, 44100}, {2, 8, 44100}, {1, 16, 44100}, {2, 16, 44100}, + {1, 8, 48000}, {2, 8, 48000}, {1, 16, 48000}, {2, 16, 48000}, }; /*********************************************************************** Index: dlls/winmm/wavemap/wavemap.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winmm/wavemap/wavemap.c,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -r1.24 wavemap.c --- dlls/winmm/wavemap/wavemap.c 31 Oct 2002 00:54:27 -0000 1.24 +++ dlls/winmm/wavemap/wavemap.c 11 Dec 2002 02:55:03 -0000 @@ -189,26 +192,30 @@ {wom->avgSpeedInner = wfx.nAvgBytesPerSec; goto found;} for (i = ndlo; i < ndhi; i++) { /* first try with same stereo/mono option as source */ wfx.nChannels = lpDesc->lpFormat->nChannels; + TRY(48000, 16); TRY(44100, 16); TRY(22050, 16); TRY(11025, 16); /* 2^3 => 1, 1^3 => 2, so if stereo, try mono (and the other way around) */ wfx.nChannels ^= 3; + TRY(48000, 16); TRY(44100, 16); TRY(22050, 16); TRY(11025, 16); /* first try with same stereo/mono option as source */ wfx.nChannels = lpDesc->lpFormat->nChannels; + TRY(48000, 8); TRY(44100, 8); TRY(22050, 8); TRY(11025, 8); /* 2^3 => 1, 1^3 => 2, so if stereo, try mono (and the other way around) */ wfx.nChannels ^= 3; + TRY(48000, 8); TRY(44100, 8); TRY(22050, 8); TRY(11025, 8); @@ -217,7 +225,8 @@ } HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, wom); - return MMSYSERR_ALLOCATED; + return WAVERR_BADFORMAT; + found: if (dwFlags & WAVE_FORMAT_QUERY) { *lpdwUser = 0L;

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Stretch Drawing

by Mike Hearn

I think XV (xvideo) might have stuff for hardware scaling, it might be worth asking on the xpert list. I was talking to somebody the other night who reckoned Director was 4x slower under Wine than Windows, potentially because Director thought it couldn't use hardware acceleration and was doing all the rendering in software? Something to investigate at some point On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 23:03, Lionel Ulmer wrote: > > Is anyone aware of this problem or am I misinterpreting the problem. If > > this is what's happening, is there an equivalent to XPutImage that requests > > that the stretching operation be done in the graphics hardware which is going > > to be considerably faster and almost instantaneous I would guess. > > No, you're right. And such an API does not exist in 'standard' X AFAIK. > Maybe in the Render extension used by Wine do to fonts, but I never really > investigated it. > > Lionel -- Mike Hearn <m.hearn(a)signal.qinetiq.com> QinetiQ - Malvern Technology Center

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: kernel32.spec update

by Greg Turner

On Wednesday 11 December 2002 01:44 am, Francois Gouget wrote: > undocumented tell me about it. *sigh* -- gmt

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: [patch] revert part of Aug 26 change in winmm/wineoss/audio.c that broke msvc++4.0 installer?

by Dan Kegel

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On December 11, 2002 01:48 am, Dan Kegel wrote: > >>I've tracked it down further. Attached find a trace+wave and >>a patch that reverts half of Ove's patch from August, thereby >>"fixing" the problem. > > I suggest leaving the noops in, so you minimize the size of > the patch, and thus narrow down the bug even further. Thanks for the encouragement. I think I have it. Here's the smallest reversion that fixes the problem for me: --- wine-20021125/dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c 2002-11-04 14:39:19.000000000 -0800 +++ wine-20021125/dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c.spam 2002-12-10 22:57:27.000000000 -0800 @@ -1148,8 +1147,10 @@ dspspace.fragments, dspspace.fragstotal, dspspace.fragsize, dspspace.bytes); /* input queue empty and output buffer with less than one fragment to play */ - if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr && wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + wwo->dwFragmentSize) { - TRACE("Run out of wavehdr:s...\n"); + if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr && wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + 2 * wwo->dwFragmentSize) { + TRACE("Run out of wavehdr:s... flushing (%lu => %lu)\n", + wwo->dwPlayedTotal, wwo->dwWrittenTotal); + wwo->dwPlayedTotal = wwo->dwWrittenTotal; return INFINITE; } Can someone who understands the code comment? Thanks, Dan

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: [patch] revert part of Aug 26 change in winmm/wineoss/audio.c that broke msvc++4.0 installer?

by Dimitrie O. Paun

On December 11, 2002 02:20 am, Dan Kegel wrote: > /* input queue empty and output buffer with less than one fragment to play */ > - if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr && wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + wwo->dwFragmentSize) { > - TRACE("Run out of wavehdr:s...\n"); > + if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr && wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + 2 * wwo->dwFragmentSize) { > + TRACE("Run out of wavehdr:s... flushing (%lu => %lu)\n", > + wwo->dwPlayedTotal, wwo->dwWrittenTotal); > + wwo->dwPlayedTotal = wwo->dwWrittenTotal; > return INFINITE; > } > Can someone who understands the code comment? I don't, never looked at audio code before, but the above has two changes: The condition has the '2 *' bit in it, and the body of the if has + wwo->dwPlayedTotal = wwo->dwWrittenTotal; The TRACEs are noops, can be ignored. So I suggest trying them out individually, to see which one causes the problem (or maybe they can not be separated). Experimentation will tell. :) -- Dimi.

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Conformance tests on WinNT

by Dimitrie O. Paun

On December 11, 2002 12:13 am, James K Whiting wrote: > I have access to Windows ME. Where are the tests and instructions? Take a look here: http://www.dssd.ca/wine/Wine-Janitorial.html#tests I'll put you up for WinME. -- Dimi.

Dec. 11, 2002

[patch] revert part of Aug 26 change in winmm/wineoss/audio.c that broke msvc++4.0 installer?

by Dan Kegel

Dan Kegel wrote: > I finally tracked down the regression in the MSVC 4.0 installer > to one patch: > > http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2002/08/0166.html > ------ > Modified files: > dlls/winmm/wineoss: audio.c > > Log message: > Ove Kaaven <ovek(a)transgaming.com> > Tweaks to improve playback performance and reduce sound glitches: I've tracked it down further. Attached find a trace+wave and a patch that reverts half of Ove's patch from August, thereby "fixing" the problem. Chris Morgan seems interested in looking into the problem, and I imagine he and I will iterate a bit on it, but I wanted to post this patch and log in case anyone was curious about this bug. (In case it isn't clear, I'm a total newbie when it comes to wine internals, so I'd never have gotten this far if I were doing anything more than tracking down a regression.) - Dan ======= patch that "fixes" the problem by reverting half of Ove's patch ======== ======= this is overkill, but I haven't tracked it down precisely yet ========== --- wine-20021125/dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c.old 2002-12-10 21:59:45.000000000 -0800 +++ wine-20021125/dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c 2002-12-10 21:57:48.000000000 -0800 @@ -31,10 +31,6 @@ /* unless someone makes a wineserver kernel module, Unix pipes are faster than win32 events */ #define USE_PIPE_SYNC -/* an exact wodGetPosition is usually not worth the extra context switches, - * as we're going to have near fragment accuracy anyway */ -/* #define EXACT_WODPOSITION */ - #include "config.h" #include <stdlib.h> @@ -130,8 +126,7 @@ */ typedef struct { /* FIXME: this could be made a dynamically growing array (if needed) */ - /* maybe it's needed, a Humongous game manages to transmit 128 messages at once at startup */ -#define OSS_RING_BUFFER_SIZE 192 +#define OSS_RING_BUFFER_SIZE 30 OSS_MSG messages[OSS_RING_BUFFER_SIZE]; int msg_tosave; int msg_toget; @@ -181,7 +176,6 @@ DWORD dwPlayedTotal; /* number of bytes actually played since opening */ DWORD dwWrittenTotal; /* number of bytes written to OSS buffer since opening */ - BOOL bNeedPost; /* whether audio still needs to be physically started */ /* synchronization stuff */ HANDLE hStartUpEvent; @@ -1145,11 +1139,13 @@ wodUpdatePlayedTotal(wwo, &dspspace); availInQ = dspspace.bytes; TRACE("fragments=%d/%d, fragsize=%d, bytes=%d\n", - dspspace.fragments, dspspace.fragstotal, dspspace.fragsize, dspspace.bytes); + dspspace.fragments, dspspace.fragstotal, dspspace.fragsize, dspspace.bytes); /* input queue empty and output buffer with less than one fragment to play */ - if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr && wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + wwo->dwFragmentSize) { - TRACE("Run out of wavehdr:s...\n"); + if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr && wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + 2 * wwo->dwFragmentSize) { + TRACE("Run out of wavehdr:s... flushing (%lu => %lu)\n", + wwo->dwPlayedTotal, wwo->dwWrittenTotal); + wwo->dwPlayedTotal = wwo->dwWrittenTotal; return INFINITE; } @@ -1169,14 +1165,6 @@ wwo->lpPlayPtr->reserved = wwo->dwWrittenTotal + wwo->lpPlayPtr->dwBufferLength; } while (wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags(wwo, &availInQ) && wwo->lpPlayPtr && availInQ > 0); } - - if (wwo->bNeedPost) { - /* OSS doesn't start before it gets either 2 fragments or a SNDCTL_DSP_POST; - * if it didn't get one, we give it the other */ - if (wwo->dwBufferSize < availInQ + 2 * wwo->dwFragmentSize) - ioctl(wwo->ossdev->fd, SNDCTL_DSP_POST, 0); - wwo->bNeedPost = FALSE; - } } return wodPlayer_DSPWait(wwo); @@ -1208,20 +1196,6 @@ if (wwo->state == WINE_WS_PLAYING) { dwNextFeedTime = wodPlayer_FeedDSP(wwo); dwNextNotifyTime = wodPlayer_NotifyCompletions(wwo, FALSE); - if (dwNextFeedTime == INFINITE) { - /* FeedDSP ran out of data, but before flushing, */ - /* check that a notification didn't give us more */ - wodPlayer_ProcessMessages(wwo); - if (!wwo->lpPlayPtr) { - TRACE("flushing\n"); - ioctl(wwo->ossdev->fd, SNDCTL_DSP_SYNC, 0); - wwo->dwPlayedTotal = wwo->dwWrittenTotal; - } - else { - TRACE("recovering\n"); - dwNextFeedTime = wodPlayer_FeedDSP(wwo); - } - } } else { dwNextFeedTime = dwNextNotifyTime = INFINITE; } @@ -1351,7 +1325,6 @@ wwo->dwBufferSize = info.fragstotal * info.fragsize; wwo->dwPlayedTotal = 0; wwo->dwWrittenTotal = 0; - wwo->bNeedPost = TRUE; OSS_InitRingMessage(&wwo->msgRing); @@ -1568,9 +1541,7 @@ if (lpTime == NULL) return MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM; wwo = &WOutDev[wDevID]; -#ifdef EXACT_WODPOSITION OSS_AddRingMessage(&wwo->msgRing, WINE_WM_UPDATE, 0, TRUE); -#endif val = wwo->dwPlayedTotal; TRACE("wType=%04X wBitsPerSample=%u nSamplesPerSec=%lu nChannels=%u nAvgBytesPerSec=%lu\n", ============ trace+wave showing the problem ================ trace:wave:OSS_WaveOutInit OSS dsp out mask=00000018 trace:wave:OSS_WaveOutInit OSS dsp out caps=00000000 trace:wave:OSS_WaveOutInit out dwFormats = 00000FFF, dwSupport = 0000000C trace:wave:OSS_WaveInInit OSS dsp in caps=00000000 trace:wave:OSS_WaveInInit OSS in dsp mask=00000018 trace:wave:OSS_WaveInInit in dwFormats = 00000FFF trace:wave:OSS_widMessage (0, 0064, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000); trace:wave:OSS_widMessage (0, 0032, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000); trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0064, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000); trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0003, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000); trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0005, 417B2C18, 417B2C48, 00030008); trace:wave:wodOpen (0, 0x417b2c48, 00030008); trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 4294967295ms (4294967295,4294967295) trace:wave:wodOpen fd=12 fragmentSize=1024 trace:wave:wodOpen wBitsPerSample=16, nAvgBytesPerSec=88200, nSamplesPerSec=44100, nChannels=1 nBlockAlign=2! trace:wave:wodNotifyClient wMsg = 0x03bb dwParm1 = 0000 dwParam2 = 0000 trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0007, 00000001, 40296160, 00000020); trace:wave:wodPrepare (0, 0x40296160, 00000020); trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0007, 00000001, 40296180, 00000020); trace:wave:wodPrepare (0, 0x40296180, 00000020); trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0009, 00000001, 40296160, 00000020); trace:wave:wodWrite (0, 0x40296160, 00000020); trace:wave:OSS_wodMessage (0, 0009, 00000001, 40296180, 00000020); trace:wave:wodWrite (0, 0x40296180, 00000020); trace:wave:wodPlayer_ProcessMessages Received WINE_WM_HEADER 40296160 trace:wave:wodPlayer_ProcessMessages Received WINE_WM_HEADER 40296180 trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=15/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=15998 trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP Setting time to elapse for 0x40296160 to 29400 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.0[29400]/15998 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=470 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=1/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=1880 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.15998[29400]/1880 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=942 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.17878[29400]/2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=1/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=1412 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.20230[29400]/1412 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=940 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.21642[29400]/2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=940 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.23994[29400]/2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=940 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.26346[29400]/2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,4294967295) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=1/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=1410 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296160.28698[29400]/702 trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP Setting time to elapse for 0x40296180 to 34972 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296180.0[5572]/708 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,189) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=942 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,178) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296180.708[5572]/2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,162) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=942 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,151) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296180.3060[5572]/2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,136) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=0/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=942 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,125) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=2/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=2352 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x40296180.5412[5572]/160 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,109) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=3/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=3134 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,98) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=4/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=4544 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,82) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=5/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=5956 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,66) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=6/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=6896 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,56) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=8/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=8308 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,40) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=9/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=9248 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,29) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=10/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=10660 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,13) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=11/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=11600 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 2ms (11,2) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=11/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=12072 trace:wave:wodNotifyClient wMsg = 0x03bd dwParm1 = 40296160 dwParam2 = 0000 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,60) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=13/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=13482 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,44) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=14/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=14894 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,28) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=15/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=15834 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,17) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=15/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=15998 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,15) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=15/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=15998 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,15) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=15/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=15998 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,15) trace:wave:wodPlayer_FeedDSP fragments=15/17, fragsize=1024, bytes=15998 trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 11ms (11,15) ============ (repeats forever, doesn't exit) =======================

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: [patch] revert part of Aug 26 change in winmm/wineoss/audio.c that broke msvc++4.0 installer?

by Dimitrie O. Paun

On December 11, 2002 01:48 am, Dan Kegel wrote: > I've tracked it down further. Attached find a trace+wave and > a patch that reverts half of Ove's patch from August, thereby > "fixing" the problem. I suggest leaving the noops in, so you minimize the size of the patch, and thus narrow down the bug even further. For example: > -/* an exact wodGetPosition is usually not worth the extra context > switches, - * as we're going to have near fragment accuracy anyway */ > -/* #define EXACT_WODPOSITION */ > - These are comments, can stay. > #include "config.h" > > #include <stdlib.h> > @@ -130,8 +126,7 @@ > */ > typedef struct { > /* FIXME: this could be made a dynamically growing array (if needed) > */ - /* maybe it's needed, a Humongous game manages to transmit 128 > messages at once at startup */ -#define OSS_RING_BUFFER_SIZE 192 > +#define OSS_RING_BUFFER_SIZE 30 Maybe (?) this one can stay. > opening */ DWORD dwWrittenTotal; /* number of > bytes written to OSS buffer since opening */ > - BOOL bNeedPost; /* whether audio This one can stay. > TRACE("fragments=%d/%d, fragsize=%d, bytes=%d\n", > - dspspace.fragments, dspspace.fragstotal, dspspace.fragsize, > dspspace.bytes); + dspspace.fragments, dspspace.fragstotal, > dspspace.fragsize, dspspace.bytes); This one seems to be just white space change, so it can stay. > wwo->dwPlayedTotal = 0; > wwo->dwWrittenTotal = 0; > - wwo->bNeedPost = TRUE; Can stay. > OSS_InitRingMessage(&wwo->msgRing); > > @@ -1568,9 +1541,7 @@ > if (lpTime == NULL) return MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM; > > wwo = &WOutDev[wDevID]; > -#ifdef EXACT_WODPOSITION > OSS_AddRingMessage(&wwo->msgRing, WINE_WM_UPDATE, 0, TRUE); > -#endif > val = wwo->dwPlayedTotal; Ditto. -- Dimi.

Dec. 11, 2002

WinXP Test Oddities (Changed Test Results!!)

by Kye Lewis

Hi, I ran the advapi32_test registry again today, and only received 3 errors: h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:96: Test failed: value set to 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of 'Te' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:97: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' h:\wine\wine\dlls\advapi32\tests\registry.c:111: Test failed: data set to 'xxxxxxx' instead of 'foobar' This seems very strange to me. I ran the test at first because I thought it might have been a matter of long file names, but then when I moved it back I found it wasnt, there was just something weird happening instead. Ill try to reproduce the other errors tonight if I can, and if I am successful I will post the results to the wine-devel group. David Miller, you also received 31 errors for this test, yes? Could you test again straight after a computer reboot? Thanks, Kye Lewis ================ You can reach me at: kyethespy(a)liquid2k.com at most times lew01(a)mcsc.vic.edu.au from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday lewislan(a)net2000.com.au is an alternative email

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Conformance tests on WinNT

by Tony Lambregts

James K Whiting wrote: >>>I don't think that anyone's posted the results of the conformance tests >>>as run on NT. >>> >>> >>There has been no post on 98SE and ME.. >>Anyone want to Volinteer ?? >> >>Francos has made it verry simple to do :)) >> >>Tom >> >> > >I have access to Windows ME. Where are the tests and instructions? > > > The following was shamelessly copied and pasted from Francois Gouget's e-mail of 2:29 December 9, 2002 >So what I did is compile them here, whip up a quick batch file to >invoke them all, and zip them up. You can download them from: > >http://fgouget.free.fr/wine/winetests.zip > > >Just unzip them in some random directory and run them as follows: > >runtests.bat > > >The above script skips the generated tests (for no particular reason) >and skips the sysparams user32 test because it messes the environment >badly (e.g. the width of window borders). > >Given the number of tests that fail you may want to run them one by one >to better capture their output. To do so just have a quick look at >the batch file, running the tests is very easy, e.g.: > >kernel32_test.exe path > > >The zip file I made is very rough on the edges. What we need is: > * automatic generation of that batch file (by msvcmaker?) > * automatic zipping of the tests > * better handling of Wine_Header vs. MSVC_Header tests > * or maybe just base this on the MinGW cross-compiler rather than the >Visual C++ 'port' > >Volunters welcome. > > > Since you have Windows ME you may have better luck with redirecting the output to a file than I do with 98. ie: runtests > TestResults.txt or kernel32_test.exe path > kernelresults.txt -- Tony Lambregts

Dec. 11, 2002

window(statusbar) position bug

by Chris Morgan

Under managed mode starcrafts editor the status bar appears in the incorrect location, some 1 inch from the bottom of the maximized window(the way the editor starts up). The same behavior occurs in non-managed mode although the status bar is in the correct location whenever the window isn't maximized. Any ideas? Alexandre? I wouldn't mind looking into this but I'm not very familiar with how wine/windows handles resizing and where to begin looking. Thanks, Chris

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: Conformance tests on WinNT

by James K Whiting

> > I don't think that anyone's posted the results of the conformance tests > > as run on NT. > > There has been no post on 98SE and ME.. > Anyone want to Volinteer ?? > > Francos has made it verry simple to do :)) > > Tom I have access to Windows ME. Where are the tests and instructions? James

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: wine/tools mingwrap.c

by Alexandre Julliard

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes: > True, but we do need to include the $prefix/include dir, because > our headers include "wine/blah.h", and if $prefix is not a standard > location (/usr or /usr/local) that will not work. I think it's reasonable to require the user to specify an explicit include path if they install Wine in a non-standard directory. This shouldn't be a common case anyway. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: wine/ programs/winhelp/Makefile.in dlls/user/M ...

by Alexandre Julliard

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes: > I didn't do it as I wanted to keep the patch contained, but I think > it's good that it's in -- it can only help. Did you notice any problems > without it? No, there shouldn't be any problem in normal usage, but it could cause some hard to debug problems in certain (broken) setups, so I think it's safer to add it. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

Dec. 11, 2002

Wine, Windows.Forms on Linux, GC and segfaults.

by Miguel de Icaza

Hello, With the help of Hans Boehm, I have been tracking the problems we have to run the Windows.Forms code with GC enabled. Turns out that the problem is not the Boehm code at all, it just exposes a problem that might be happening elsewhere. The problem is that by the time that Wine has been initialized, using setjmp/longjmp will always lead to a crash. The code in pthreads that performs the longjmp will first try to invoke the pthread cleanup routines, and then invoke longjmp. This never happens. In the particular case of Mono, I added a small bit of code before calling into Boehm's GC, and then I run my app like this: wine monostub.exe.so The code snippet is: jmp_buf buf; printf ("Here\n"); if (setjmp (buf) == 0){ printf ("before\n"); longjmp (buf, 1); } else { printf ("after\n"); } The code should display: Here before after But with Wine, I get a crash inside longjmp, after the "before" is printed out. I get the Wine Console with the stack trace, but I can not copy/paste from it, so I have included a screenshot of it. I can not run Wine with Valgrind because it calls modify_ldt(), but I suspect memory corruption. I was wondering if it would be possible to just "link" against the Wine library instead of having to create a stub application to run from? Best wishes, Miguel

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: wine/tools mingwrap.c

by Dimitrie O. Paun

On December 10, 2002 08:31 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Wine internal includes should not be in the include path. True, but we do need to include the $prefix/include dir, because our headers include "wine/blah.h", and if $prefix is not a standard location (/usr or /usr/local) that will not work. -- Dimi.

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: wine/ programs/winhelp/Makefile.in dlls/user/M ...

by Dimitrie O. Paun

On December 10, 2002 08:34 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Pass the -J option to wrc to avoid including installed headers. I thought about doing it, but when we invoke wrc out of the tree, we specify the include path which should come before the std headers. I didn't do it as I wanted to keep the patch contained, but I think it's good that it's in -- it can only help. Did you notice any problems without it? -- Dimi.

Dec. 11, 2002

Re: user32:PrivateExtractIcons{AW} take 2

by Uwe Bonnes

>>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Bonnes <bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes: >>>>> "Rolf" == Rolf Kalbermatter <rolf.kalbermatter(a)citeng.com> writes: Rolf> I'm sorry for having sent earlier patches which seemed to be Rolf> garbled with line breaks. I'll try again and hope they come Rolf> through ok this time, otherwise I probably have to find a new Rolf> email client ;-) Uwe> Hallo Rolf, Uwe> this patch make a treeview in Xilinx Webpack miss it's icons. The problem is still there after the round of updates this evening. To get icons in the treeview no I must change the return value in line378 in exticon to S_OK. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: user32:PrivateExtractIcons{AW} take 2

by Uwe Bonnes

>>>>> "Rolf" == Rolf Kalbermatter <rolf.kalbermatter(a)citeng.com> writes: Rolf> I'm sorry for having sent earlier patches which seemed to be Rolf> garbled with line breaks. I'll try again and hope they come Rolf> through ok this time, otherwise I probably have to find a new Rolf> email client ;-) Hallo Rolf, this patch make a treeview in Xilinx Webpack miss it's icons. If I change back the return value in ICO_ExtractIconExW around line 360 to S_OK ( you changed it to (icon - nIconIndex)) the icons reappear. The sequence with the missing icons is (with a little more debugging instrumentation): trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsA "G:\\DOSC\\XILINX~1\\DATA\\PROJNAV\\IMAGE\\MEMFILE.ICO" 0 32x32 0x41aac1a0 (nil) 1 0x00000000 trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsW L"G:\\DOSC\\XILINX~1\\DATA\\PROJNAV\\IMAGE\\MEMFILE.ICO" 0 32x32 0x41aac1a0 (nil) 1 0x00000000 trace:icon:ICO_ExtractIconExW L"G:\\DOSC\\XILINX~1\\DATA\\PROJNAV\\IMAGE\\MEMFILE.ICO", 0, 1 (nil) 0x00000000 trace:icon:USER32_GetResourceTable 0x41c80000 0x406c27ec trace:icon:ICO_ExtractIconExW -- OS2/icon Signature (0x00000001) trace:icon:ICO_GetIconDirectory 0x41c80000 0x406c27e4 trace:icon:ICO_ExtractIconExW -- icon found 0x41ada380 0x00000014 0x00000001 0x00000001 trace:icon:ICO_LoadIcon 0x41c80000 0x41c80006 size 0x00000128 ret 0x41c80016 trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsW ret 0x00000001 pIconId 0x00000000 trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsA ret 0x00000001 and here after changing back the return value to S_OK trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsA "G:\\DOSC\\XILINX~1\\DATA\\PROJNAV\\IMAGE\\MEMFILE.ICO" 0 32x32 0x41ac3d50 (nil) 1 0x00000000 trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsW L"G:\\DOSC\\XILINX~1\\DATA\\PROJNAV\\IMAGE\\MEMFILE.ICO" 0 32x32 0x41ac3d50 (nil) 1 0x00000000 trace:icon:ICO_ExtractIconExW L"G:\\DOSC\\XILINX~1\\DATA\\PROJNAV\\IMAGE\\MEMFILE.ICO", 0, 1 (nil) 0x00000000 trace:icon:USER32_GetResourceTable 0x41c80000 0x406c27ec trace:icon:ICO_ExtractIconExW -- OS2/icon Signature (0x00000001) trace:icon:ICO_GetIconDirectory 0x41c80000 0x406c27e4 trace:icon:ICO_ExtractIconExW -- icon found 0x41ad89e8 0x00000014 0x00000001 0x00000001 trace:icon:ICO_LoadIcon 0x41c80000 0x41c80006 size 0x00000128 ret 0x41c80016 trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsW ret 0x00000000 pIconId 0x00000000 trace:icon:PrivateExtractIconsA ret 0x00000000 trace:icon:CURSORICON_ExtCopy hIcon 0x606, nType 1, iDesiredCX 16, iDesiredCY 16, nFlags 16384 trace:icon:CURSORICON_ExtCopy LR_COPYFROMRESOURCE: Failed to load from cache trace:icon:DestroyIcon32 (04ee, 0004) Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: Stretch Drawing

by Lionel Ulmer

> Is anyone aware of this problem or am I misinterpreting the problem. If > this is what's happening, is there an equivalent to XPutImage that requests > that the stretching operation be done in the graphics hardware which is going > to be considerably faster and almost instantaneous I would guess. No, you're right. And such an API does not exist in 'standard' X AFAIK. Maybe in the Render extension used by Wine do to fonts, but I never really investigated it. Lionel -- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: sound3d stub implementations, part I

by Andreas Mohr

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:14:27PM +0100, Rok Mandeljc wrote: > I've managed to run ultima ix with openglide, but sound doesn't really work (3D sound is silent). So I've decided to try to implement stubs in sound3d.c in dsound. This is first part of it. It's my first real work, so someone please check it if it's ok (it seems logical to me, but it could be wrong). Actually it seems quite illogical to me... Hint, hint: you forgot the patch ;-)) Andreas Mohr

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: MSI (MS Installer)

by Duane Clark

Scott Cote wrote: > > > I agree that the installers that are blindly expecting msiexec to be there > are flawed. However, since most windows machines have msiexec installed, > the end result is that these installers will run on most windows machines > but not on wine. Perhaps a "simple" solution would be a "dummy" msiexec which is installed only if a real one does not exist, which simply prints a message or pops up a dialog when it is executed telling the user where to download MSI.

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: MSI (MS Installer)

by Scott Cote

Thanks to all that who responded to my MSI query. It sounds like I need not look into implementing it. I just wanted to address one issue. >> We don't need to implement every MS dll. We only need to implement: >> - core dlls (kernel32, comclt32, ...) which applications expect to be >> available >> - dlls used for compiling/porting (msvcrt) >> I guess this msiexec is not loaded to the system after a clean >> Windowsinstall. In this case the installer must cope with the situation that >> msiexec is not there and must provide it itself. I agree that the installers that are blindly expecting msiexec to be there are flawed. However, since most windows machines have msiexec installed, the end result is that these installers will run on most windows machines but not on wine.

Dec. 10, 2002

Stretch Drawing

by Patrick Cairns

Hi, StretchBlt/StretchDIBits operation doesn't appear to be getting done in hardware. In fact performance is slightly improved if I scale the image prior myself and call BitBlt/SetDiBitsToDevice. If I'm correct in my understanding of the x11drv source code (bitblt.c) it appears to be scaling it in software and sending this image to the hardware using XPutImage - only looked briefly. Scaling it myself might be quicker because wine is having to prepare buffers for the scaling it itself each time. Is anyone aware of this problem or am I misinterpreting the problem. If this is what's happening, is there an equivalent to XPutImage that requests that the stretching operation be done in the graphics hardware which is going to be considerably faster and almost instantaneous I would guess. I noticed that painting very large dialogs can be slow - might this be caused by the same thing? Thanks Patrick

Dec. 10, 2002

Unused code in kernel/tests/process.c

by Francois Gouget

kernel/tests/process.c defines a decodeW function but does not use it. Should we #ifdef it out or remove it completely? Index: dlls/kernel/tests/process.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/kernel/tests/process.c,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 process.c --- dlls/kernel/tests/process.c 22 Jun 2002 00:08:10 -0000 1.5 +++ dlls/kernel/tests/process.c 10 Dec 2002 20:50:05 -0000 @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ return ptr; } +#if 0 static WCHAR* decodeW(const char* str) { size_t len; @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ ptr[len] = '\0'; return ptr; } +#endif /****************************************************************** * init -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere...

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: possible memory corruption

by Tony Lambregts

steve.lustbader(a)philips.com wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>"steve" == steve lustbader <steve.lustbader(a)philips.com> writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> steve> When I try to load a window in my app that has a treeview in it, >>> steve> it crashes immediately, before the window even gets displayed. >>> steve> This is the end of the backtrace: >>> >>>Try running with native commctrl to see if the corruption comes from our >>>commctrl implementation. Then run with --debugmsg +relay,+heap. Wine will >>>check on every heap manipulation to see if the heap is still okay. Then >>>look what corrupted the heap. >>> >>> >>It works fine with a native (WinXP) comctl32.dll. I'll post the +relay,+heap >>output shortly. >> >> >> > >Is there a way to turn debug output on/off? I don't get the heap corruption >until my app starts and I open a specific window, but it takes forever for my >app to start using +relay,+heap. I don't need the output at first, since >everything is fine in the beginning, so I'd like to be able to turn the debug >output on just before I open the window that causes the problem. > > > There are two ways to do this 1) Adding it into a function using software It is possible to turn on or off debuging for a class or channel using a software call in a funtion. The call to use is wine_dbg_parse_options(+|-class]|[+|-channel]") Examples: wine_dbg_parse_options("+ddraw") this will turn on the trace, warn, err and fixme class messages for the ddraw channel. wine_dbg_parse_options("warn+ddraw") this will turn on the warn class messages for the ddraw channel. Please note that relay is not an ordinary channel and is treated differently by wineserver. In order for relay to function there is some work that needs to be done at startup. So one way to get it to work properly would is to start with the program with -debugmsg +relay turn it off with wine_dbg_parse_options, and then turn it on again when needed. 2) Turning on/off Debug channels and classes in the debugger It is possible to turn on and of debugging output from within the debugger using the set command. Using this technique has the advantage of reducing the size of the debug log. Examples: set +gdi</parameter> This will turn on messages for all calls to gdi channel. set warn+draw This will turn on all messages of the class warn on the channel ddaw. warning: If you start the program with winedbg -debugmsg +(channel) calls from the debugger will be logged which is not what you want. Therefore, If you need to start logging messages as the program starts you can start the program with wine and attach to the program with the debugger. ***** Yes this will be part of the documentation at some point.<grin> -- Tony Lambregts

Dec. 10, 2002

Wineboot

by Matthew Davison

I recently requested a copy of the wineboot program, which i obtained from the mailing list, however this code is somewhat old. Does anyone have a newer version of this code, or has it not been changed since the version I have (6/02, i think). Either way i am considering improving parts of this program, and would like to know if i will be duplicating any work. -- Matthew Davison <m.davison(a)virgin.net>

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: Conformance tests on WinNT

by Tom

> I don't think that anyone's posted the results of the conformance tests > as run on NT. There has been no post on 98SE and ME.. Anyone want to Volinteer ?? Francos has made it verry simple to do :)) Tom

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: lz32 & kernel32

by Francois Gouget

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Marcus Meissner wrote: [...] > > What should we do? Should we have kernel32 import lz32 and forward the > > LZ functions it? Or should we do like Windows, which means moving the LZ > > APIs to kernel32, and turn all the entry points in lz32 into forwards > > pointing to kernel32 like on Windows? > > If the LZ APIs are exposed from kernel32 ... Then I would say yes. > > Will the forwarding work for the 16bit version too? I'm not sure. I don't have the export tables of the 16bit libraries so I don't know what XP does. I'm hoping that if krnl386.exe does not export the lzexpand API then we can cleanly separate it in lzexpand by just calling the 32 version. -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away - and barefoot.

Dec. 10, 2002

Conformance tests on WinNT

by Luke Stras

I don't think that anyone's posted the results of the conformance tests as run on NT. Here are the results of the conformance tests on WinNT, SP 6. Note that msvcrt_test.exe crashes; I include a Dr. Watson log of the crash. I hope that this is of use. --- vvv test results begin below vvv --- d:\temp\winetest>advapi32_test.exe registry registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe alloc alloc: 58 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe atom atom: 229398 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe codepage codepage: 2 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe directory directory: 48 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe drive drive: 150 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe environ environ: 39 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe file h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:578: Test failed: DeleteFile should fail with an empty path, and last error value should be ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:610:Current offset = 0015 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:635:Current offset = 0015 file: 487238 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe format_msg format_msg: 58 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe locale locale: 54 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe path h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:568: Test failed: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:569: Test failed: GetShortPathA should have returned 'ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND' h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:591: Test failed: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:592: Test failed: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 'ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND' h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:656: Test failed: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:657: Test failed: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 'ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND' h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:732: Test failed: GetLongPathNameA returned 'd:\shortdir\pathtest.pth' instead of 'C:\shortdir\pathtest.pth' h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check0-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check0-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check0-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check0-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check0-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check0-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check0-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check0-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check1-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check1-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check1-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check1-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check1-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check1-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check1-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check1-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check2-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check2-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check2-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check2-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check2-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check2-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check2-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check2-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check3-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check3-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check3-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check3-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check3-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check3-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check3-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check3-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check4-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check4-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check4-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check4-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check4-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check4-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check4-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check4-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check5-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check5-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check5-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check5-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check5-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check5-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check5-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check5-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check6-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check6-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check6-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check6-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check6-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check6-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check6-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check6-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check8-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check8-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check8-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check8-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check8-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check8-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check8-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check8-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check9-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check9-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check9-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check9-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check9-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check9-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check9-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check9-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check12-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check12-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check12-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check12-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check12-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check12-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check12-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check12-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check13-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check13-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check13-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check13-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check13-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check13-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check13-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check13-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check18-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check18-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check18-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check18-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check18-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check18-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check18-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check18-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check19-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check19-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check19-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check19-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check19-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check19-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:242: Test failed: check19-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check19-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:246: Test failed: check20-1: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:271: Test failed: check20-1: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 123 or 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:246: Test failed: check20-2: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:271: Test failed: check20-2: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 123 or 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:246: Test failed: check20-3: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:271: Test failed: check20-3: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 123 or 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:246: Test failed: check20-4: GetShortPathNameA passed when it shouldn't have h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:271: Test failed: check20-4: GetShortPathA returned 0 and not 123 or 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:927:TMP=d:\TEMP h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:935:TMP=D:\WINNT h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:944:TMP=D:\ h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:954:TMP=D: h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:822: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:834: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:838: Test failed: should touch the buffer h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:839: Test failed: returned length should be equal to the length of string h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:840: Test failed: should add back slash h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:841: Test failed: should return length without terminating 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:848: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:879: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:892: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10, got 13 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:898: Test failed: win2000 BUG: should return path without terminating back slash h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:906: Test failed: returned length should be equal to the length of string h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:907: Test failed: should add back slash h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:908: Test failed: should return length without terminating 0 path: 1398 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 132 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe process h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:374: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpDesktop expected (null), got WinSta0\Default h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:375: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpTitle expected (null), got d:\temp\winetest\kernel32_test.exe h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:450: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpDesktop expected (null), got WinSta0\Default h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:527: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpTitle expected (null), got d:\temp\winetest\kernel32_test.exe process: 116 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 4 failures. d:\temp\winetest>kernel32_test.exe thread thread: 95 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>msvcrt_test.exe msvcrt d:\temp\winetest>netapi32_test.exe access h:\wine\wine\dlls\netapi32\tests\access.c:95: Test failed: Bad Network Path access: 23 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. d:\temp\winetest>netapi32_test.exe apibuf apibuf: 15 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>netapi32_test.exe wksta wksta: 14 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>Rem These don't compile with the MSVC headers d:\temp\winetest>ntdll_test.exe error The name specified is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. d:\temp\winetest>ntdll_test.exe rtlbitmap The name specified is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. d:\temp\winetest>ntdll_test.exe rtlstr The name specified is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. d:\temp\winetest>rpcrt4_test.exe rpc h:\wine\wine\dlls\rpcrt4\tests\rpc.c:124: ** Uuid Conversion and Comparison Tests ** rpc: 901 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>shell32_test.exe shlfileop shlfileop: 121 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>shlwapi_test.exe clist h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\clist.c:367: Test failed: allowed bad element size h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\clist.c:372: Test failed: allowed adding a container clist: 236 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 2 failures. d:\temp\winetest>shlwapi_test.exe shreg h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:79: Test failed: RegCreateKeyA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:105: Test failed: SHGetValueA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:106: Test failed: (0123456789,bar\subdir1) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:107: Test failed: (ffffffff) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:112: Test failed: SHGetValueA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:113: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:114: Test failed: (ffffffff) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:140: Test failed: test4 RegOpenKey h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:150: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:156: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:157: Test failed: (0) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:164: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:165: Test failed: (6,24) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:171: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:172: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:182: Test failed: (6) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:184: Test failed: (0) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:185: Test failed: (6,24) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:194: Test failed: ERROR_MORE_DATA h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:196: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:197: Test failed: (0) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:205: Test failed: Expected ERROR_MORE_DATA h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:206: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:207: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:208: Test failed: (82,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:209: Test failed: (0) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:218: Test failed: (6) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:219: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:220: Test failed: (0) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:125: Test failed: SHRegGetPathA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:126: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:241: Test failed: didn't open dest shreg: 36 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 32 failures. d:\temp\winetest>user32_test.exe class class: 80 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>rem Comment out the following test because it messes the environment d:\temp\winetest>rem dlls\user\\user32_test.exe sysparams d:\temp\winetest>user32_test.exe win h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:91:main window 006E0798 main2 00DB0740 desktop 0001001E child 002F07DA h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:107:created child 002607D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:120:created child of desktop 002707D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:130:created child of child 002807D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:140:created top-level 002907D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:150:created owned top-level 002A07D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:160:created popup 002B07D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:170:created owned popup 002C07D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:180:created top-level owned by child 002D07D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:186:created popup owned by desktop 002E07D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:192:created popup owned by child 002F07D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:198:created WS_CHILD popup 003007D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:204:created owned WS_CHILD popup 003207D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:209:testing parent changes h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:221:created child 003307D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:247:created top-level 003407D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:264:created popup 003507D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:281:created child 003607D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:298:created top-level 003707D0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:307:created owned popup 003E07AA h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:323:created owner 003B07D0 and popup 007F07FA h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:337:created owner 003D07D0 and popup 004107AA h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:345:created owner 003E07D0 and popup 004207AA win: 373 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>user32_test.exe wsprintf wsprintf: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>wininet_test.exe http h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:90:Starting with flags 0x10000000 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:92:InternetOpenA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:95:InternetOpenA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:101:InternetConnectA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0004 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012E990 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:104:InternetConnectA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:108:HttpOpenRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012EC04 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:122:HttpOpenRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:126:HttpSendRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:133:HttpSendRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME(10) 010AFBA0 15 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_NAME_RESOLVED(11) 010AFB90 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTING_TO_SERVER(20) 010AFC38 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTED_TO_SERVER(21) 010AFDDC 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST(30) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT(31) 010AFD7C 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE(40) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED(41) 010AFE00 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE(100) 010AFE44 8 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:140:Option 0x17 -> 1 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:144:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:149:Option 0x16 -> 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:17:02 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.1.2 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:154:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:158:Option 0x5 -> 0 http://www.winehq.com/about/ (12150) h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:163:Option 0x1 -> 1 text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:166:Entery Query loop h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 743 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 4808 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 6354 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC30 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC30 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:90:Starting with flags 0x0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:92:InternetOpenA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:95:InternetOpenA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:101:InternetConnectA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0004 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012E990 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:104:InternetConnectA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:108:HttpOpenRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012EC04 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:122:HttpOpenRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:126:HttpSendRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST(30) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT(31) 0012EB28 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE(40) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED(41) 0012EB14 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:133:HttpSendRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:140:Option 0x17 -> 1 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:144:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:149:Option 0x16 -> 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:17:02 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.1.2 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=99 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:154:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:158:Option 0x5 -> 0 http://www.winehq.com/about/ (12150) h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:163:Option 0x1 -> 1 text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:166:Entery Query loop h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 744 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 4808 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 6353 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC30 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC30 4 http: 22 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. d:\temp\winetest>winmm_test.exe wave h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:56:found 1 WaveOut devices h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:82: 0: "OPL3-SA Playback" 3.6 (37:16): channels=2 formats=0fff support=000c h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:101: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:118: Test failed: failed to open device 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:133:Testing invalid 2MHz format h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:142: Test failed: opening the device at 2MHz should fail 0: rc=4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:161: Test failed: opening the device at 2MHz should fail 0: rc=4 wave: 29 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 26 failures. d:\temp\winetest>ws2_32_test.exe sock h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:694: **** STARTING TEST 0 **** h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:332:simple_server (c4) starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:341:simple_server (c4) ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (c4): waiting for client h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:391:simple_client (76): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:394:simple_client (76): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:391:simple_client (88): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:394:simple_client (88): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:406:simple_client (76) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (c4): waiting for client h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:427:simple_client (76) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:406:simple_client (88) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:374:simple_server (c4) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:427:simple_client (88) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:696: **** TEST 0 COMPLETE **** h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:694: **** STARTING TEST 1 **** h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:332:simple_server (7f) starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:341:simple_server (7f) ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (7f): waiting for client h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:445:event_client (d1): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:445:event_client (68): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:447:event_client (d1): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:447:event_client (68): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:467:event_client (d1) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:505:event_client (d1): all data sent - shutdown h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (7f): waiting for client h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:526:event_client (d1): all data received h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:538:event_client (d1): close event h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:556:event_client (d1) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:467:event_client (68) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:505:event_client (68): all data sent - shutdown h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:374:simple_server (7f) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:526:event_client (68): all data received h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:538:event_client (68): close event h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:556:event_client (68) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:696: **** TEST 1 COMPLETE **** sock: 148 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. --- ^^^ test results end above ^^^ --- --- vvv Dr. Watson crash log begin below vvv --- Microsoft (R) Windows NT (TM) Version 4.00 DrWtsn32 Copyright (C) 1985-1996 Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. Application exception occurred: App: (pid=124) When: 12/10/2002 @ 14:48:50.734 Exception number: c0000005 (access violation) *----> System Information <----* Computer Name: SAILRAIL User Name: stras Number of Processors: 1 Processor Type: x86 Family 6 Model 5 Stepping 1 Windows Version: 4.0 Current Build: 1381 Service Pack: 6 Current Type: Uniprocessor Free Registered Organization: UTIAS Registered Owner: Luke Stras *----> Task List <----* 0 Idle.exe 2 System.exe 20 SMSS.exe 24 CSRSS.exe 34 WINLOGON.exe 40 SERVICES.exe 43 LSASS.exe 66 SPOOLSS.exe 76 matlabserver.ex.exe 86 RPCSS.exe 98 PSTORES.exe 117 cygrunsrv.exe 200 sshd.exe 182 NDDEAGNT.exe 181 EXPLORER.exe 183 systray.exe 123 SETI(a)home.exe 142 LOADWC.exe 164 OSA.exe 198 SshClient.exe 236 Winamp.exe 159 xemacs.exe 172 matlab.exe 151 AcroRd32.exe 192 netscape.exe 150 tcsh.exe 177 tcsh.exe 167 CMD.exe 124 msvcrt_test.exe 67 DRWTSN32.exe 0 _Total.exe (00400000 - 00418000) (77f60000 - 77fbe000) dll\ntdll.dbg (78000000 - 78040000) (77f00000 - 77f5e000) dll\kernel32.dbg State Dump for Thread Id 0x94 eax=7800bb44 ebx=7ffdf000 ecx=00000101 edx=77fa75d0 esi=00416228 edi=00000000 eip=77f6ce4c esp=0012fde8 ebp=0012fe48 iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz ac po nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 efl=00000296 function: RtlpWaitForCriticalSection 77f6ce28 e920010000 jmp RtlpWaitForCriticalSection+0x196 (77f6cf4d) 77f6ce2d 803d987ffa7701 ds:77fa7f98=01 cmp byte ptr [fltused+0x12a8 (77fa7f98)],0x1 77f6ce34 1bc0 sbb eax,eax 77f6ce36 25e080fa77 and eax,0x77fa80e0 77f6ce3b 837e1000 cmp dword ptr [esi+0x10],0x0 ds:01324c2e=???????? 77f6ce3f 8945fc mov [ebp-0x4],eax ss:0103e84e=???????? 77f6ce42 7506 jnz RtlpWaitForCriticalSection+0x93 (77f6ce4a) 77f6ce44 56 push esi 77f6ce45 e8b6fdffff call RtlSetCriticalSectionSpinCount+0x70 (77f6cc00) 77f6ce4a 8b06 mov eax,[esi] ds:00416228=7800bb44 FAULT ->77f6ce4c ff4010 inc dword ptr [eax+0x10] ds:78f1a54a=???????? 77f6ce4f 8b06 mov eax,[esi] ds:00416228=7800bb44 77f6ce51 ff75fc push dword ptr [ebp-0x4] ss:0103e84e=???????? 77f6ce54 6a00 push 0x0 77f6ce56 ff4014 inc dword ptr [eax+0x14] ds:78f1a54a=???????? 77f6ce59 ff7610 push dword ptr [esi+0x10] ds:01324c2e=???????? 77f6ce5c e86fb4ffff call NtWaitForSingleObject (77f682d0) 77f6ce61 3d02010000 cmp eax,0x102 77f6ce66 0f85b2000000 jne RtlpWaitForCriticalSection+0x167 (77f6cf1e) 77f6ce6c 57 push edi 77f6ce6d 6822cdf677 push 0x77f6cd22 77f6ce72 e881940000 call DbgPrint (77f762f8) *----> Stack Back Trace <----* FramePtr ReturnAd Param#1 Param#2 Param#3 Param#4 Function Name 0012fe48 77f67586 00416228 7800f980 00416228 7800fa91 ntdll!RtlpWaitForCriticalSection 0012fedc 00401b74 003005fc 77f92cd4 77f9d4d0 7ffdf000 ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection 0012ff4c 00402175 00000002 003005e0 00300ea0 00415000 !<nosymbols> 0012ffc0 77f1b9ea 77f92cd4 77f9d4d0 7ffdf000 c0000005 !<nosymbols> 0012fff0 00000000 00402092 00000000 000000b0 00000100 kernel32!GetProcessPriorityBoost 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 !<nosymbols> *----> Raw Stack Dump <----* 0012fde8 dc fe 12 00 08 62 41 00 - 00 f0 fd 7f 00 00 00 00 .....bA......... 0012fdf8 b0 ff 12 00 00 f0 fd 7f - d0 d4 f9 77 74 fe 12 00 ...........wt... 0012fe08 74 fe 12 00 ef 1e 40 00 - bc 40 41 00 fc 05 30 00 t.....(a)..@A...0. 0012fe18 06 00 00 00 dc fe 12 00 - d0 d4 f9 77 00 f0 fd 7f ...........w.... 0012fe28 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012fe38 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc 00 00 00 00 ................ 0012fe48 dc fe 12 00 86 75 f6 77 - 28 62 41 00 80 f9 00 78 .....u.w(bA....x 0012fe58 28 62 41 00 91 fa 00 78 - 08 62 41 00 dc fe 12 00 (bA....x.bA..... 0012fe68 d0 d4 f9 77 00 f0 fd 7f - 50 1c 40 00 08 62 41 00 ...w....P.(a)..bA. 0012fe78 f4 41 41 00 fc 05 30 00 - 4c ff 12 00 d0 d4 f9 77 .AA...0.L......w 0012fe88 00 f0 fd 7f cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012fe98 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012fea8 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012feb8 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012fec8 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012fed8 00 00 00 00 4c ff 12 00 - 74 1b 40 00 fc 05 30 00 ....L...t.(a)...0. 0012fee8 d4 2c f9 77 d0 d4 f9 77 - 00 f0 fd 7f cc cc cc cc .,.w...w........ 0012fef8 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012ff08 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ 0012ff18 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc - cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ --- ^^^ Dr. Watson crash log ends above ^^^ --- -- Luke Stras <stras(a)utias.toronto.edu> "The meek can have the Earth; the rest of us have other plans" --Henry Spencer

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: possible memory corruption

by steve.lustbader＠philips.com

>>>>>>> "steve" == steve lustbader <steve.lustbader(a)philips.com> writes: >> >> steve> When I try to load a window in my app that has a treeview in it, >> steve> it crashes immediately, before the window even gets displayed. >> steve> This is the end of the backtrace: >> >> Try running with native commctrl to see if the corruption comes from our >> commctrl implementation. Then run with --debugmsg +relay,+heap. Wine will >> check on every heap manipulation to see if the heap is still okay. Then >>look what corrupted the heap. > >It works fine with a native (WinXP) comctl32.dll. I'll post the +relay,+heap >output shortly. > Is there a way to turn debug output on/off? I don't get the heap corruption until my app starts and I open a specific window, but it takes forever for my app to start using +relay,+heap. I don't need the output at first, since everything is fine in the beginning, so I'd like to be able to turn the debug output on just before I open the window that causes the problem. -Steve

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: Conformance test --MSVC Headers 1 of 2 OverLook last 1 of 2 ...

by Vincent Béron

> c:\include\wine\dlls\ntdll\tests\error.c(23) : fatal error C1083: Cannot > open include file: 'ntstatus.h': No such file or directory > rtlbitmap.c > c:\include\wine\dlls\ntdll\tests\rtlbitmap.c(26) : fatal error C1083: > Cannot open include file: 'winternl.h': No such file or directory See the explanation below. > NOTE: WINVER has been defined as 0x0500 or greater which enables > Windows NT 5.0 and Windows 98 features. When these headers were released, > Windows NT 5.0 beta 1 and Windows 98 beta 2.1 were the current versions. > For this release when WINVER is defined as 0x0500 or greater, you can only > build beta or test applications. To build a retail application, > set WINVER to 0x0400 or visit http://www.microsoft.com/msdn/sdk > to see if retail Windows NT 5.0 or Windows 98 headers are available. > See the SDK release notes for more information. > c:\include\wine\dlls\oleaut32\tests\vartest.c(656) : fatal error C1064: > compiler limit : token overflowed internal buffer > Error executing cl.exe. See the explanation below for the NOTE. For the token overflow, I guess MSVC has a lower limit than gcc. Anyway, what's the reason to have a 200+ characters long number? Wouldn't it be easier on the compiler to have 9.9999997e200 (or something like that), and it'd be the same value? > c:\include\wine\dlls\ntdll\tests\error.c(23) : fatal error C1083: Cannot > open include file: 'ntstatus.h': No such file or directory > rtlbitmap.c > c:\include\wine\dlls\ntdll\tests\rtlbitmap.c(26) : fatal error C1083: > Cannot open include file: 'winternl.h': No such file or directory I guess the problem is that you have an old platform SDK installed. I have the same problem, but it'll be fixed in a few days (not my machine, so can't just install a newer one). winternl.h (and maybe ntstatus.h) should be included in recent SDK. Vincent

Dec. 10, 2002

Character conversion warnings in netapi32/tests

by Vincent Béron

Here's the output of building the netapi32 tests under MSVC with MSVC headers. I don't get those warnings with Wine's headers. Deleting intermediate files and output files for project 'winetest - Win32 MSVC Headers'. Deleting intermediate files and output files for project 'netapi32_test - Win32 MSVC Headers'. --------------------Configuration: winetest - Win32 MSVC Headers-------------------- Performing Custom Build Step on .\include\wine\unicode.h 1 fichier(s) copi‚(s). Performing Custom Build Step on .\include\wine\test.h 1 fichier(s) copi‚(s). Performing Custom Build Step on .\include\wine\exception.h 1 fichier(s) copi‚(s). --------------------Configuration: netapi32_test - Win32 MSVC Headers-------------------- Compiling... access.c apibuf.c wksta.c c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(76) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(79) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(85) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(85) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(89) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(90) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(91) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(92) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(98) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(98) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' c:\tt\wine-20021210-1430\dlls\netapi32\tests\wksta.c(102) : warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'const unsigned short *' testlist.c Generating Code... Linking... netapi32_test.exe - 0 error(s), 11 warning(s) Seems the definition of lstr*W is different, but I couldn't find any differences in header files. Both define lstr*W(LPCWSTR[,LPCWSTR]). Also, the arguments are really unsigned short * (at least it's what MSDEV tells me when I hoover over them). Vincent

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: Fix for comparisons in netapi32/tests

by Francois Gouget

ok(NetApiBufferSize(p, &dwSize) == NERR_Success, "Got size"); - ok(dwSize >= 0, "The size"); + ok(dwSize < 0x80000000, "The size"); [...] ok(NetApiBufferAllocate(0, (LPVOID *)&p) == NERR_Success, "Reserved memory"); ok(NetApiBufferSize(p, &dwSize) == NERR_Success, "Got size"); - ok((dwSize >= 0) && (dwSize < 0xFFFFFFFF),"The size of the 0-length buffer"); + ok(dwSize < 0xFFFFFFFF, "The size of the 0-length buffer"); I think this test does not make sense. Why would 0xfffffffe be considered valid and not 0xffffffff? The truth is we have no idea what value to expect from a call to NetApiBufferAllocate(0,...) and thus there is nothing to test. The < 0x80000000 test just above seems just as arbitrary (just a better approximation of 'if this were a signed int would it be positive?'). So I vote to just remove both tests, or, for the first case, to actually find out what value we should expect (but I doubt this is documented). -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ The nice thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing quite respectable -- Paul Dean

Dec. 10, 2002

Re: Intel 8x0 and ALSA sound driver

by Eric Pouech

Nikolay Stefanov wrote: > I've fixed the problem - turns out that ALSA driver doesn't like it when the > buffer and period sizes are set directly. I modified the setup code to use > buffer and period times instead, with some values that I copied from the OGLE > alsa driver. Also it seems that the driver crashes if these are set before the > sample rate, if you are wondering about the change of order. Everything seems > to work normally now, I tested it with WinAmp and some games. > > What do you think, is this is a driver issue or a wine issue? None of the other > projects that I checked (ogle, mplayer) set the sizes directly, they use time > values instead. If all other ALSA users do it this way, then Wine is certainly incorrect. > Lastly, is there any special reason why the dsound implementation is not > using mmap_write, like the wave one does? at the time this has been written, it has been tried to do so, but differencies in mapping between ALSA and way dsound does the mapping made it quite difficult (search in wine-devel archives for the detail) > > Nikolay > > PS: Thanks to Michal Miroslaw for the patch, it's a lot simpler than what I did > initially. looks way better than previous ok you can safely submit to wine-patches for inclusion A+

Dec. 10, 2002

Conformance Test

by Tom

Here is the test ( Win2K Advance Server ) Second half some msvcrt_test info at the bottom Tom ---- C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>wininet_test.exe http h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:90:Starting with flags 0x10000000 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:92:InternetOpenA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:95:InternetOpenA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:101:InternetConnectA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0004 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012E994 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:104:InternetConnectA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:108:HttpOpenRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012EC04 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:122:HttpOpenRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:126:HttpSendRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:133:HttpSendRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead ╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠ ╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠ ╠╠╠╠ ╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╘²▓(80) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME(10) 00B2FBDC 15 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_NAME_RESOLVED(11) 00B2FBCC 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_CONNECTING_TO_SERVER(20) 00B2FC48 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_CONNECTED_TO_SERVER(21) 00B2FDDC 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST(30) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_REQUEST_SENT(31) 00B2FD84 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE(40) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED(41) 00B2FE04 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE(100) 00B2FE40 8 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:140:Option 0x17 -> 1 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:144:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.c om/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:149:Option 0x16 -> 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:46:47 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4. 1.2 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:154:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.c om/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:158:Option 0x5 -> 0 http://www.winehq.co m/about/ (12150) h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:163:Option 0x1 -> 1 text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:166:Entery Query loop h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 743 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 4808 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:172: Test failed: InternetQueryDataAvaila ble failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE(100) 00B2FE40 8 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION(50) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED(51) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EBFC 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC0C 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:90:Starting with flags 0x0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:92:InternetOpenA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:95:InternetOpenA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:101:InternetConnectA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0004 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012E994 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:104:InternetConnectA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:108:HttpOpenRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0012EC04 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:122:HttpOpenRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:126:HttpSendRequestA --> h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead ╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠ ╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠ ╠╠╠╠ ╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╠╪δ↕(80) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_CONNECTING_TO_SERVER(20) 0012EA4C 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_CONNECTED_TO_SERVER(21) 0012EA28 12 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST(30) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_REQUEST_SENT(31) 0012EB30 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE(40) 00000000 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED(41) 0012EB14 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:133:HttpSendRequestA <-- h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:140:Option 0x17 -> 1 0 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:144:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.c om/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:149:Option 0x16 -> 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:46:48 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4. 1.2 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:154:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.c om/about/ h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:158:Option 0x5 -> 0 http://www.winehq.co m/about/ (12150) h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:163:Option 0x1 -> 1 text/html h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:166:Entery Query loop h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 743 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 1896 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 7292 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 1974 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EBFC 4 h:\wine\wine\dlls\wininet\tests\http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_ STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0012EC0C 4 http: 22 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>winmm_test.exe wave h:\wine\wine\dlls\winmm\tests\wave.c:56:found 0 WaveOut devices wave: 2 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>ws2_32_test.exe sock h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:694: **** STARTING TEST 0 **** h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:332:simple_server (650) starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:341:simple_server (650) ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (650): waiting for clie nt h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:391:simple_client (5f4): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:394:simple_client (5f4): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:391:simple_client (5f0): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:394:simple_client (5f0): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:406:simple_client (5f4) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (650): waiting for clie nt h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:427:simple_client (5f4) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:406:simple_client (5f0) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:374:simple_server (650) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:427:simple_client (5f0) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:696: **** TEST 0 COMPLETE **** h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:694: **** STARTING TEST 1 **** h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:332:simple_server (1e4) starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:341:simple_server (1e4) ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (1e4): waiting for clie nt h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:445:event_client (608): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:445:event_client (618): starting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:447:event_client (608): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:467:event_client (608) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:505:event_client (608): all data sent - s hutdown h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:346:simple_server (1e4): waiting for clie nt h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:526:event_client (608): all data received h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:538:event_client (608): close event h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:556:event_client (608) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:447:event_client (618): server ready h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:467:event_client (618) connected h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:505:event_client (618): all data sent - s hutdown h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:374:simple_server (1e4) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:526:event_client (618): all data received h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:538:event_client (618): close event h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:556:event_client (618) exiting h:\wine\wine\dlls\winsock\tests\sock.c:696: **** TEST 1 COMPLETE **** sock: 196 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. ----------------------- In msvcrt_test.exe I get this The instruction at "0x77f8ed61" refernced at "0x700bbae". The memory could not be "written". Then on bebug I get this -- Unhandled exception in msvcrt_test.exe (NTDLL.DLL):0xC000005:Acess Violation The pointer in the debug points to this -- 77F8ED61 inc dword ptr [eax+10h]

Dec. 10, 2002

Conformance Test

by Tom

Here is the test ( Win2K Advance Server ) First half Tom ---- C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp3>netapi32_test.exe access h:\wine\wine\dlls\netapi32\tests\access.c:95: Test failed: Bad Network Path access: 23 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp3>netapi32_test.exe apibuf apibuf: 15 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp3>netapi32_test.exe wksta wksta: 14 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>advapi32_test.exe registry registry: 56 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe alloc alloc: 58 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe atom atom: 229398 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe codepage codepage: 2 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe directory directory: 48 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe drive drive: 160 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe environ environ: 39 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe file h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:578: Test failed: DeleteFile should fail w ith an empty path, and last error value should be ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:610:Current offset = 0015 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\file.c:635:Current offset = 0015 file: 487238 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe format_msg format_msg: 58 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe locale locale: 54 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe path h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:517: Test failed: GetLongPathNameA: wrong return code, 106 instead of 46 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check-1: GetShortPathA r eturned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:280: Test failed: check-1: GetLongPathA re turned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check-2: GetShortPathA r eturned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:280: Test failed: check-2: GetLongPathA re turned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:252: Test failed: check-4: GetShortPathA r eturned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:280: Test failed: check-4: GetLongPathA re turned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:257: Test failed: check-5: GetShortPathA r eturned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:280: Test failed: check-5: GetLongPathA re turned 123 and not 2 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:927:TMP=C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:935:TMP=C:\WINNT h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:944:TMP=C:\ h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:954:TMP=C: h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:822: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10 , got 11 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:834: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10 , got 11 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:848: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10 , got 11 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:879: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10 , got 11 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:892: Test failed: win2000 BUG: expected 10 , got 11 h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\path.c:898: Test failed: win2000 BUG: should retu rn path without terminating back slash path: 2083 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 15 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe process tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:374: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpDeskto p expected (null), got WinSta0\Default h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:375: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpTitle expected (null), got C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2\kernel32_test.exe tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:450: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpDeskto p expected (null), got WinSta0\Default tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. h:\wine\wine\dlls\kernel\tests\process.c:527: Test failed: StartupInfoA:lpTitle expected (null), got C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2\kernel32_test.exe tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. process: 116 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 4 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>kernel32_test.exe thread thread: 112 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>netapi32_test.exe access 'netapi32_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>netapi32_test.exe apibuf 'netapi32_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>netapi32_test.exe wksta 'netapi32_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>Rem These don't compile with the MSVC headers C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>ntdll_test.exe error 'ntdll_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>ntdll_test.exe rtlbitmap 'ntdll_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp2>ntdll_test.exe rtlstr 'ntdll_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>Rem These don't compile with the MSVC headers C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>ntdll_test.exe error 'ntdll_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>ntdll_test.exe rtlbitmap 'ntdll_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>ntdll_test.exe rtlstr 'ntdll_test.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>rpcrt4_test.exe rpc h:\wine\wine\dlls\rpcrt4\tests\rpc.c:124: ** Uuid Conversion and Comparison Test s ** rpc: 901 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>shell32_test.exe shlfileop h:\wine\wine\dlls\shell32\tests\shlfileop.c:286: Test failed: Files are copied t o other directory h:\wine\wine\dlls\shell32\tests\shlfileop.c:287: Test failed: The file is copied shlfileop: 121 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 2 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>shlwapi_test.exe clist clist: 236 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>shlwapi_test.exe shreg h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:79: Test failed: RegCreateKeyA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:105: Test failed: SHGetValueA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:106: Test failed: (0123456789,bar\subdir 1) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:107: Test failed: (ffffffff) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:112: Test failed: SHGetValueA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:113: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:114: Test failed: (ffffffff) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:140: Test failed: test4 RegOpenKey h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:150: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:156: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:157: Test failed: (3435973836) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:164: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:165: Test failed: (6,24) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:171: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:172: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:182: Test failed: (6) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:184: Test failed: (3435973836) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:185: Test failed: (6,24) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:194: Test failed: ERROR_MORE_DATA h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:196: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:197: Test failed: (3435973836) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:205: Test failed: Expected ERROR_MORE_DA TA h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:206: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:207: Test failed: (0123456789) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:208: Test failed: (39,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:209: Test failed: (3435973836) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:218: Test failed: (6) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:219: Test failed: (6,43) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:220: Test failed: (3435973836) h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:125: Test failed: SHRegGetPathA failed h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:126: Test failed: () h:\wine\wine\dlls\shlwapi\tests\shreg.c:241: Test failed: didn't open dest shreg: 36 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 32 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>user32_test.exe class class: 80 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>rem Comment out the following test because it m esses the environment C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>rem dlls\user\\user32_test.exe sysparams C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>user32_test.exe win h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:91:main window 00300244 main2 001B01A8 deskto p 0001000C child 001F0182 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:107:created child 0022018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:120:created child of desktop 0023018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:130:created child of child 0024018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:140:created top-level 0025018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:150:created owned top-level 0026018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:160:created popup 0027018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:170:created owned popup 0028018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:180:created top-level owned by child 0029018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:186:created popup owned by desktop 002A018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:192:created popup owned by child 002B018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:198:created WS_CHILD popup 002C018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:204:created owned WS_CHILD popup 002D018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:209:testing parent changes h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:221:created child 002E018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:247:created top-level 002F018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:264:created popup 0030018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:281:created child 0031018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:298:created top-level 0032018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:307:created owned popup 0033018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:323:created owner 0034018A and popup 00150204 h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:337:created owner 00160204 and popup 0035018A h:\wine\wine\dlls\user\tests\win.c:345:created owner 00170204 and popup 0036018A win: 373 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\internet downloads\temp2\temp>user32_test.exe wsprintf wsprintf: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.

Dec. 10, 2002