July 2002 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

regsvr32 with multiple arguments

by Medland, Bill

Did I miss something? Yesterday when I ran regsvr32 with multiple arguments it registered each one. Today it only registers the first. Yesterday it popped up a MessageBox with the result; today it puts the result on stdout. Does this make sense to anyone? Bill

July 19, 2002

Problem with wcmd

by Steven Edwards

This patch http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=1025909276607367637873725 results in this under mingw with gcc 2.95.c and 3.1 gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__MINGW__ -D_WINDOWS -DWINE_NO WINSOCK -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -DSTRICT -DNONAMELESSUNION -DNONAMELE SSSTRUCT -D_REENTRANT -o directory.o directory.c directory.c: In function `WCMD_filesize64': directory.c:369: `uint' undeclared (first use in this function) directory.c:369: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once directory.c:369: for each function it appears in.) directory.c:369: parse error before `r' directory.c:374: `i' undeclared (first use in this function) directory.c:378: `r' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [directory.o] Error 1 Any ideas? Thanks Steven __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com

July 19, 2002

Re: PATCH: Convert HTASK to a void*

by Michael Stefaniuc

Hello, please disregard this patch, it has build problems in a "make clean" enviroment. An other problem is that WOWHandle32 and WOWHandle16 are needed in loader/task.c, but I suspect I'm not allowed to import wow32 into the ntdll? bye michael On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:07:16AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > this patch should close bug #502, but I have some questions (that's why > wine-devel is CC'ed): > - is it correct to use the HTASK_{16,32} macros or should I use > WOWHandle{16,32}? The difference is that the macros include a type > cast to the right handle. > - GetAppCompatFlags() works internaly with a HTASK16. Can I move the > implementation to GetAppCompatFlags16()? Would save a handle > conversion in GetAppCompatFlags16(). > > I'll close the bug report after the patch get's accepted. > > License: LGPL, X11 > Changelog: > Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> > - Convert HTASK to a void* > - Fix HTASK_32 macro > > > bye > michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 System Administration Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH Email: mstefani(a)redhat.com Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/ D-70178 Stuttgart

July 19, 2002

Preliminary patch for Bug 675 - LVM_SCROLL

by Guy L. Albertelli

The attached patch implements LVM_SCROLL. While not many programs use it, implementing it required changing how scrollbars were handled for all of Listview. This new implementation is much more like the native. The scrollbars mimic the range of pixels that they cover. This allows the specification of a pixel level scroll which is critical to LVM_SCROLL. The only exception (and the native does this also) is for LVS_LIST displays where the scrollbar is related to the number of columns to be displayed. Before submitting to wine-patches, I am interested in feedback and any discrepancies with how the native controls work (-dll commctrl,comctl32=n). Thanks, Guy Albertelli <<galberte(a)neo.lrun.com>>

July 19, 2002

Re: wine/files dos_fs.c smb.c smb.h

by Rein Klazes

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:17:19 -0500, you wrote: > > Log message: > Mike McCormack <mikem(a)codeweavers.com> > First go at reading directories on public SMB shares. > > Patch: http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=1027048639509081130455346 This breaks Forte Agent, looping endlessly around a FindNextFileA(). It is caused by the SetLastError(ERROR_NO_MORE_FILES) that is lost in the final HeapUnlock call. A quick fix is attached. files/ : dos_fs.c Repair SetLastError in FindNextFileA. Rein. -- Rein Klazes rklazes(a)xs4all.nl

July 19, 2002

RE: Errors running winapi_extract --stub-statistics

by Patrik Stridvall

> I think this is because the module name is no longer in the > .spec file. Lines > 71-73 of winapi_extract look for "name" in the .spec file, > which no longer > exists. Should we be using the file name as the module name? Correct. Patch for this and other problem with winapi_extract coming soon.

July 19, 2002

Re: Errors running winapi_extract --stub-statistics

by Gregg Mattinson

I think this is because the module name is no longer in the .spec file. Lines 71-73 of winapi_extract look for "name" in the .spec file, which no longer exists. Should we be using the file name as the module name? Gregg Mattinson Co-op Developer Sun Microsystems of Canada >From: Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> >To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com >cc: Patrik Stridvall <ps(a)leissner.se> >Subject: Errors running winapi_extract --stub-statistics >Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:19:15 -0700 (PDT) > > >Hi, > > >I was trying to update the API statistics but I got the following >errors: > >$ ./tools/winapi/winapi_extract --stub-statistics >Use of uninitialized value in hash element at >./tools/winapi/winapi_extract line 97. >Use of uninitialized value in hash element at >./tools/winapi/winapi_extract line 97. >... > >There is quite a few of these. So I tentatively modified the line as >follows: > $module2entries{$module} = $entries if (defined $module); > >But then I got: >$ ./tools/winapi/winapi_extract --stub-statistics >controls/button.c (file 1 of 796)Not a HASH reference at >tools/winapi_check/winapi_parser.pm line 32. > >So obviously there is another problem or my previous 'fix' was not so >good. Any ideas? > > >-- >Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ > In a world without fences who needs Gates? >

July 19, 2002

Patch for memory-mapping problem -- See VirtualQuery post

by Max

Well, I took off the dirty hack on virtual.c and put inside something that seems to me much more like a real solution. Took off in executable mapping VPROT_WRITE and VPROT_WRITECOPY flags and added VPROT_EXEC; that looks much more close to win2k mapping. The only difference now is in Type field, wine maps as MEM_PRIVATE and win2k as MEM_IMAGE (I guess that's the right one, but no time now to check. Here the attached patch.... any comment appreciated :-) Regards Max

July 19, 2002

Errors running winapi_extract --stub-statistics

by Francois Gouget

Hi, I was trying to update the API statistics but I got the following errors: $ ./tools/winapi/winapi_extract --stub-statistics Use of uninitialized value in hash element at ./tools/winapi/winapi_extract line 97. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at ./tools/winapi/winapi_extract line 97. ... There is quite a few of these. So I tentatively modified the line as follows: $module2entries{$module} = $entries if (defined $module); But then I got: $ ./tools/winapi/winapi_extract --stub-statistics controls/button.c (file 1 of 796)Not a HASH reference at tools/winapi_check/winapi_parser.pm line 32. So obviously there is another problem or my previous 'fix' was not so good. Any ideas? -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ In a world without fences who needs Gates?

July 19, 2002

Re: AutoCAD2000 again and CreateFiber

by Eric Pouech

> Alle 21:40, giovedì 18 luglio 2002, Eric Pouech ha scritto: > > > TEB: Thread execution block... it's the descriptor of any running thread > > in the system (see include/thread.h) > > on NT, the TEB starts with a thread information block > > so if I did understand, in NT fibers are mapped to threads descriptors > directly.... not really... fibers descriptors are chained in a TEB so that the thread (which is the sole execution unit seen by the scheduler) can arrange its own scheduling of fibers A+ --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) The future will be better tomorrow, Vice President Dan Quayle ------------------------------------------ Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr

July 19, 2002