July 2002 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Bad exe

by Oliver Ob

admiral coeyman schrieb: > > Group, > While running tests at my end, I found an odd problem that seems to have > developed out of the blue. It seems that only 32 bit dos executables will now > run on my system. All of the 16-bit executables that I've been using for the > past few years generate 'bad exe' errors. I've redownloaded most of the tree > and nothing has fixed this problem. > Before I look too deep, is this a problem that anybody else has? It's > possible that my local tree has been damaged or that my development tools are > not right. > God Bless, > --Robert 'Admiral' Coeyman > [I've had vga planets 4.0 running.] > Aye aye sir! Good to read you here, Rob! As you know I am also fiddling around with VGAP/WinPlan/P4 and also had sort of these errors. I have no dev tools here, but am going to reinstall as I said in PM. All the best Admiral Regards from Jenneraaal.. :-) (Try to pronounce that haha!) -- *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ =Oliver(a)home= *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/Olli/olli.html I I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/friends.html I I http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VGAP-93 I I mailto:VGAP-93-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com I I http://home.t-online.de/home/spacecraft.portal I >>> Telek0ma iBBMS - now back online +49.4504.TRSi1/TRSi2 <<<

July 9, 2002

Re: MS' hidden API

by Oliver Ob

Francois Gouget schrieb: > Apparently, what you want is to see Linux succeed on the desktop. Then > Office, Outlook, Money & co are a requirement. The issue is not whether Nonsense. At all, those Outsuck and blind-explorer files are not even a requirement on Windoze! The rest of what you wrote deserves an almost full ACK! But no need to quote it. Best regards!! -- *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ =Oliver(a)home= *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/Olli/olli.html I I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/friends.html I I http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VGAP-93 I I mailto:VGAP-93-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com I I http://home.t-online.de/home/spacecraft.portal I >>> Telek0ma iBBMS - now back online +49.4504.TRSi1/TRSi2 <<<

July 9, 2002

wine source doubts

by Preetham

Hi All: I am a newbie to wine. I have a few queries. 1. I downloaded the wine source from cvs, however, is there any document as to where i can start lookin into the code.? 2. Where is the program(wine loader) that loads a .ece file located in the source. Appriciate the help. Regards, Preetham

July 9, 2002

Re: Bad exe

by Uwe Bonnes

>>>>> "admiral" == admiral coeyman <admiral(a)corner.net> writes: admiral> Group, While running tests at my end, I found an odd problem admiral> that seems to have developed out of the blue. It seems that admiral> only 32 bit dos executables will now run on my system. All of admiral> the 16-bit executables that I've been using for the past few admiral> years generate 'bad exe' errors. I've redownloaded most of the admiral> tree and nothing has fixed this problem. Before I look too admiral> deep, is this a problem that anybody else has? It's possible admiral> that my local tree has been damaged or that my development admiral> tools are not right. God Bless, --Robert 'Admiral' Coeyman admiral> [I've had vga planets 4.0 running.] Alexandre submitted something with regard to 16 bit yesterday (wine/dlls/version info.c). Remove this and if that doesn't help remove all other yesterdays patches step by step. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

July 9, 2002

Re: wine source doubts

by Uwe Bonnes

>>>>> "Preetham" == Preetham <preetham(a)student.utdallas.edu> writes: Preetham> Hi All: I am a newbie to wine. I have a few queries. 1. I Preetham> downloaded the wine source from cvs, however, is there any Preetham> document as to where i can start lookin into the code.? I don't understand your question. You have the code, so what stops you from looking at it. To get a glimpse where ite going on what will take some time however. Start e.g. so look where some isolated functionality is implemented, like the iternet functionality in ../wine/dll/wininet. Preetham> 2. Where is the program(wine loader) that loads a .ece file Preetham> located in the source. Appriciate the help. Regards, ../wine/loader Preetham> Preetham <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Please, no HTML in mail. -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

July 9, 2002

Bad exe

by admiral coeyman

Group, While running tests at my end, I found an odd problem that seems to have developed out of the blue. It seems that only 32 bit dos executables will now run on my system. All of the 16-bit executables that I've been using for the past few years generate 'bad exe' errors. I've redownloaded most of the tree and nothing has fixed this problem. Before I look too deep, is this a problem that anybody else has? It's possible that my local tree has been damaged or that my development tools are not right. God Bless, --Robert 'Admiral' Coeyman [I've had vga planets 4.0 running.] -- --- May you live as long as you wish and age but a single day. http://www.dotguy.net/ admiral(a)corner.net Webmaster/ Linux Administrator Computer Co-Op/CornerNet

July 9, 2002

about XIM support on wine

by rain shaw

Hi all, I do apply some patches to the wine source according to some tips in bugs library,and I can input chinese in notepad now. But,every time window was created,will the input method popup.For example,if a message box popped up,the xim will popup as well. It seems that we called the XIM related Xlib function every time new window was created. Would u please give me some suggestions about how to disable create and open XIM while create non-text-input related window? in other word,how to determin the x-window that going to be created is a control that need input method ? Thanx!

July 9, 2002

RFC: Re: [ros-kernel] Shell32 and dplax

by Steven Edwards

Note: Forwarded to wine-devel I'm more in support of us chaning wine rather then adapting win9x calls to ReactOS. That being said I have enough trouble writing a 3 line patch so my voice doesnt count to much..."You guys are the programmers, I just break shit." IMHO the way WINE handles certain things is really fubar. A good example besides MapSL and ConvertToGlobalHandle is the way WINE implements PSAPI. All wine psapi does it convert the toolhelp functions already implemented in to the needed format with a wineserver call or two thrown in. If we are going to use wine and not fork the crap out of it then we should fix the 9xisms as we find them. Currently wine has all sorts of ways for doing things, you have win16 apis being called in some places, ntdll in others and then 9xisms all over the place. So far we have MapSL ConvertToGlobalHandle PSAPI DriectX HAL interfaces ? idunno I guess it comes to what can we do to better share code. Currently there is not a chance in hell of us sharing PSAPI in its current state. I started two bugs in wines bugzilla a few weeks ago regarding it. Mabey we should have a meta-bug for making WINE more NT like in "certain" areas. I dont expect the wine projects to make all sorts of changes just for us and not as they are trying to get a 1.0 release. Anyone got any feedback? Mabey we will get more support for this once David and Jason are done with the basic Windowing. Steven > MapSL is in wine kernel32 also, Oh yeah, it's part > of windows 9x > kernel32.dll too. > James __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com

July 9, 2002

One more try at bug 829 (same surface corruption)

by Tony Lambregts

After talking with Lionel Ulmer offline I came up with the following patch for bug 829. It includes a hopefully more clear comment of when the corruption can occure and a better set of rules. Change log: fix same surface corruption when no flags are set and areas are the same size Tony Lambregts tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net Index: dib.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/ddraw/dsurface/dib.c,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 dib.c --- dib.c 28 Jun 2002 17:32:25 -0000 1.11 +++ dib.c 9 Jul 2002 03:57:37 -0000 @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ int bpp, srcheight, srcwidth, dstheight, dstwidth, width; int x, y; LPBYTE dbuf, sbuf; + BOOL SameSurfaceOK = TRUE; TRACE("(%p)->(%p,%p,%p,%08lx,%p)\n", This,rdst,src,rsrc,dwFlags,lpbltfx); @@ -474,6 +475,18 @@ sbase = (BYTE*)sdesc.lpSurface+(xsrc.top*sdesc.u1.lPitch)+xsrc.left*bpp; xinc = (srcwidth << 16) / dstwidth; yinc = (srcheight << 16) / dstheight; + SameSurfaceOK = ((src != iface)|| + (sbase >= dbuf)|| + (xdst.top > xsrc.bottom)||(xdst.left > xsrc.right)||(xdst.right < xsrc.left)); + + /* + A little explination: Screen coruption can occure if the following set of circumstances is true + + 1.) Both the source and destination are the same surface. -->(src != iface) + 2.) The start of the source is less than the destination . -->(sbase >= dbuf) + 3.) There is overlap. -->(xdst.top < xsrc.bottom)&&(xdst.left < xsrc.right)(xdst.right < xsrc.left) + This is fixed in the case where no flags are set and the areas are the same size. + */ if (!dwFlags) { /* No effects, we can cheat here */ @@ -482,11 +495,29 @@ /* No stretching in either direction. This needs to be as * fast as possible */ sbuf = sbase; - for (y = 0; y < dstheight; y++) { - memcpy(dbuf, sbuf, width); - sbuf += sdesc.u1.lPitch; - dbuf += ddesc.u1.lPitch; - } + if (SameSurfaceOK) { + for (y = 0; y < dstheight; y++) { + memcpy(dbuf, sbuf, width); + sbuf += sdesc.u1.lPitch; + dbuf += ddesc.u1.lPitch; + } + } else { + sbuf += (sdesc.u1.lPitch*dstheight); + dbuf += (ddesc.u1.lPitch*dstheight); + if (xdst.top == xsrc.top) { /* Are the source and destination on the same line? */ + for (y = 0; y < dstheight; y++) { + sbuf -= sdesc.u1.lPitch; + dbuf -= ddesc.u1.lPitch; + memmove(dbuf, sbuf, width); + } + } else { + for (y = 0; y < dstheight; y++) { + sbuf -= sdesc.u1.lPitch; + dbuf -= ddesc.u1.lPitch; + memcpy(dbuf, sbuf, width); + } + } + } } else { /* Stretching in Y direction only */ for (y = sy = 0; y < dstheight; y++, sy += yinc) { @@ -544,6 +575,10 @@ } } else if (dwFlags & (DDBLT_KEYSRC | DDBLT_KEYDEST | DDBLT_KEYSRCOVERRIDE | DDBLT_KEYDESTOVERRIDE)) { DWORD keylow, keyhigh; + + if (!SameSurfaceOK) { + FIXME("\tSoure and destination surfaces are the same and could cause display problems\n"); + } if (dwFlags & DDBLT_KEYSRC) { keylow = sdesc.ddckCKSrcBlt.dwColorSpaceLowValue;

July 9, 2002

Re: SHLWAPI wsprintf - with patch this time

by Alexandre Julliard

Jon Griffiths <jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com> writes: > +dlls/shlwapi/wsprintf.c dlls/user/wsprintf.c > Add decimal double (%f) format specifier to *printf functions. These functions are not supposed to handle %f. If you need %f you have to use the real sprintf, not the wsprintf variants. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

July 9, 2002