June 2003 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

wine exception handling

by Martin Fuchs

Hi, I have problems running an application with wine. At startup it tries to read its config file. But it catches up in an endless loop of exceptions. The attached trace is generated using --debugmsg +msvcrt,+seh,+file,+dosfs. I send only the interesting part of the full trace. However there is a: fixme:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException call to unimplemented function msvcrt.dll.localeconv But why does there happen an excpeption anyways? Any clue, whats wrong here? -- Martin Fuchs martin-fuchs(a)gmx.net

June 1, 2003

Re: Check for presence of TLS libs on RH9

by Mike Hearn

> You'll end up with /opt/wine/bin, /opt/wine/lib, etc? wine won't be in > the path, which is not standard at all and will lead to "I can't use it > after installation"... > > Also, why do you force --with-nptl at the beginning? You'll get it > either twice, or once if you don't need it. D'oh, because I'm a fool and forgot that I modified my own copy of wineinstall locally. Here is the correct patch. thanks -mike

June 1, 2003

Re: Red Hat 9 RPMs

by Mike Hearn

Cool, thanks! On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 13:27, Vincent Béron wrote: > Le dim 01/06/2003 à 07:00, Mike Hearn a écrit : > > Can somebody please remind me what the plan for these are? In IRC we > > seem to say "go to newrpms.sunsite.dk" all day, every day. It's really > > poor IMHO that after all these months, the site STILL does not mention > > this. > > > > Should I write a patch for the site, or is the intention to fix the RPMs > > on SourceForge, like, nowish? > > I've built some and put them on sf (without announcing them, me bad). If > our download page doesn't mention them, it probably doesn't mention > Mandrake either, which is available as well (can't recall if it's for a > specific version of Mandrake). > > The differences between the newrpms and sf ones' should be minimal, as I > studied both spec files before deciding some features for RH9. > > Vincent >

June 1, 2003

Re: Check for presence of TLS libs on RH9

by Vincent Béron

Le dim 01/06/2003 à 07:52, Mike Hearn a écrit : > ChangeLog: > NPTL is only available on i686 versions of Red Hat 9, so ensure the > /lib/tls directory is present before enabling support in wineinstall. > ---- > > Index: tools/wineinstall > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/tools/wineinstall,v > retrieving revision 1.55 > diff -u -r1.55 wineinstall > --- tools/wineinstall 16 May 2003 20:13:16 -0000 1.55 > +++ tools/wineinstall 1 Jun 2003 11:48:57 -0000 > @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ > # > > #--- defaults (change these if you are a packager) > -CONFARGS="" # configure args, e.g. --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc > -prefix=/usr/local # installation prefix > +CONFARGS="--with-nptl" # configure args, e.g. --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc > +prefix=/opt/wine # installation prefix You'll end up with /opt/wine/bin, /opt/wine/lib, etc? wine won't be in the path, which is not standard at all and will lead to "I can't use it after installation"... Also, why do you force --with-nptl at the beginning? You'll get it either twice, or once if you don't need it. Vincent

June 1, 2003

Re: Red Hat 9 RPMs

by Vincent Béron

Le dim 01/06/2003 à 07:00, Mike Hearn a écrit : > Can somebody please remind me what the plan for these are? In IRC we > seem to say "go to newrpms.sunsite.dk" all day, every day. It's really > poor IMHO that after all these months, the site STILL does not mention > this. > > Should I write a patch for the site, or is the intention to fix the RPMs > on SourceForge, like, nowish? I've built some and put them on sf (without announcing them, me bad). If our download page doesn't mention them, it probably doesn't mention Mandrake either, which is available as well (can't recall if it's for a specific version of Mandrake). The differences between the newrpms and sf ones' should be minimal, as I studied both spec files before deciding some features for RH9. Vincent

June 1, 2003

Red Hat 9 RPMs

by Mike Hearn

Can somebody please remind me what the plan for these are? In IRC we seem to say "go to newrpms.sunsite.dk" all day, every day. It's really poor IMHO that after all these months, the site STILL does not mention this. Should I write a patch for the site, or is the intention to fix the RPMs on SourceForge, like, nowish? ta -mike

June 1, 2003

[dx46] fixes renders lock and surface debug code (snapshots)

by Raphaël Junqueira

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This patch fix some a stupid bug i had already solved but i forgot to copy/paste ... I'll take a brown paper bag. Changelog: - fix another time the stupid bug of locking (i had already fixed in ActiveRender) - fix stupid rescaling of colors values on SaveSnapshot PS: Jason, this patch should fix your problem Regards, Raphael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+2dTNp7NA3AmQTU4RAnsZAJ95xmF1uB4++v57Ob5ESw1E/9T4bwCfeVnO pgRxU5Yk6Pzi34xLt4EpEW0= =Ou7J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

June 1, 2003

Apologize

by BiGgUn

Sorry for sending my previous request (Application crash ) on wine-patches :( Stephan

June 1, 2003

Re: Resources page updates........

by Shachar Shemesh

Tom wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking over the Resource page : > http://www.winehq.com/?page=resources > And ive found we are linked to some ... not alot but a couple 404's > For example under "WIN 32" _Win 32 API Intro_ .. We have : > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/win32/win32start_1xyd.asp > and it is one of the 404 sites.. I would like to change this to : > http://www.winprog.org/tutorial/ > > So the question is ??? > > On all the 404's ........if I find a equivalent to what we now have is > it alright with everyone > if I send a patch to fix this ? ( I would only guess yes ) > > Ive also found some sites that have the same info that were pointing > to.. And there more upto > date than the ones that we currently point to. I would like to also > update there links as well. > > I'm just asking here for thoughts/insight .. > If there are no objections ill work on this patch monday.. lots of > lead time right :) > > > Tom > > Hi Tom, Your'e going about it the wrong way. From my experience, it usually take the same time to ask about things and to actually do them. Next time, do the later. If anyone objects (and yes, some people actually read those patches you send), they will let you know. This is a free software project. The vote always goes with the people who send the diffs. Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration consultant Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/

June 1, 2003

Re: Resources page updates........

by Tom

Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Tom wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was looking over the Resource page : >> http://www.winehq.com/?page=resources >> And ive found we are linked to some ... not alot but a couple 404's >> For example under "WIN 32" _Win 32 API Intro_ .. We have : >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/win32/win32start_1xyd.asp >> and it is one of the 404 sites.. I would like to change this to : >> http://www.winprog.org/tutorial/ >> >> So the question is ??? >> >> On all the 404's ........if I find a equivalent to what we now have >> is it alright with everyone >> if I send a patch to fix this ? ( I would only guess yes ) >> >> Ive also found some sites that have the same info that were pointing >> to.. And there more upto >> date than the ones that we currently point to. I would like to also >> update there links as well. >> >> I'm just asking here for thoughts/insight .. >> If there are no objections ill work on this patch monday.. lots of >> lead time right :) >> >> >> Tom >> >> > Hi Tom, > > Your'e going about it the wrong way. From my experience, it usually > take the same time to ask about things and to actually do them. Next > time, do the later. If anyone objects (and yes, some people actually > read those patches you send), they will let you know. > > This is a free software project. The vote always goes with the people > who send the diffs. Thanks.......... Tom > > > Shachar >

June 1, 2003