October 2007 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Photoshop Elements 5 Tryout?

by Dan Kegel

On 10/19/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote: > > > Any reason why you're not using the AppDB? This is exactly what it is > > > for, > > > > Finally, I've been asking for appdb maintainer status for photoshop > > for months now, and haven't gotten it. > > Press the 'become a maintainer' button on the version/app page. I've done that twice in two months, no joy. - Dan

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Make test drill, next steps, call for help with Winetest

by Paul Vriens

Jeremy White wrote: >> Why can't you just run the winetest executable under Wine? Or do you mean you've >> changed some of the tests and want to see the results immediately? > > Because that's not logically correct. I am trying to run a regression > test on my current source tree. It *may* be identical to the one most > recently used to build winetest.exe, but it is not certain. And shouldn't > runing winetest.exe.so be exactly the same as running winetest.exe, just > skipping a cross compilation step? > I've basically done the same but only to be able to create a new winetest executable for windows. The winetest.exe that's available on http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/ is a bit different from the winetest.exe.so you have in your own tree (mostly resources). I gave it shot and came a bit further: - go to <wine>/programs/winetest - create a build.id, build.nfo and tests.url - run 'make dist' - run 'wine winetest-dist.exe.so' When you now run the test it will a create a proper report file with one important lack: the CVS version number of the tests files (have a look in the produced "tests.rc" file). dissect (part of the test.winehq.org 'infrastructure') will choke on that as it expects something like x.yy So no success here either. We can tweak 'dissect' but that you will mean we have all tests in one view and potentially comparing apples and pears/oranges. Any other ideas? -- Cheers, Paul.

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Photoshop Elements 5 Tryout?

by Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes

On Friday 19 October 2007 16:53:50 you wrote: > On 10/19/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote: > > > Anyone have a URL for PSE 5 trial version? > > > I'm updating > > > http://wiki.winehq.org/AdobePhotoshop > > > > Any reason why you're not using the AppDB? This is exactly what it is > > for, > > The only reason I have that wiki page is as a rallying point for > the folks working to get Photoshop running on Wine. > And the appdb isn't very good at > formatting (the HTML editing widget is slow and klunky, and only > controls a small active area). > Finally, I've been asking for appdb maintainer status for photoshop > for months now, and haven't gotten it. > So the appdb wasn't even an option, and fighting to get it didn't seem > worth it. > Press the 'become a maintainer' button on the version/app page. > > and a quick search for 'Photoshop Elements' gave me a 5.0 entry with a > > trial link . . . > > Yeah, but it's out of date, it gives you PSE 6. > - Dan The Adobe page said it was PSE 5, sorry.

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Photoshop Elements 5 Tryout?

by Dan Kegel

On 10/19/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote: > > Anyone have a URL for PSE 5 trial version? > > I'm updating > > http://wiki.winehq.org/AdobePhotoshop > > Any reason why you're not using the AppDB? This is exactly what it is for, The only reason I have that wiki page is as a rallying point for the folks working to get Photoshop running on Wine. And the appdb isn't very good at formatting (the HTML editing widget is slow and klunky, and only controls a small active area). Finally, I've been asking for appdb maintainer status for photoshop for months now, and haven't gotten it. So the appdb wasn't even an option, and fighting to get it didn't seem worth it. > and a quick search for 'Photoshop Elements' gave me a 5.0 entry with a trial > link . . . Yeah, but it's out of date, it gives you PSE 6. - Dan

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Make test drill, next steps, call for help with Winetest

by Jeremy White

> Why can't you just run the winetest executable under Wine? Or do you mean you've > changed some of the tests and want to see the results immediately? Because that's not logically correct. I am trying to run a regression test on my current source tree. It *may* be identical to the one most recently used to build winetest.exe, but it is not certain. And shouldn't runing winetest.exe.so be exactly the same as running winetest.exe, just skipping a cross compilation step? Cheers, Jeremy

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Photoshop Elements 5 Tryout?

by Tom Wickline

On 10/19/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> wrote: > On Friday 19 October 2007 07:19:33 Dan Kegel wrote: > > Anyone have a URL for PSE 5 trial version? > > I'm updating > > http://wiki.winehq.org/AdobePhotoshop > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > Any reason why you're not using the AppDB? This is exactly what it is for, > and a quick search for 'Photoshop Elements' gave me a 5.0 entry with a trial > link . . . Would you mind sending the link? > > > > Alexander N. Sørnes > > >

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: D3DX8: [4/13]: implement D3DX__Add with a test

by Stefan Dösinger

Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 10:13:39 schrieb David.Adam(a)math.cnrs.fr: > +#define expect_vec3(expectedvec,gotvec) ok((fabs(expectedvec.x-gotvec.x)<admitted_error)&&(fabs(expectedvec.y-gotvec.y)<admitted_error)&&(fabs(expectedvec.z-gotvec.z)<admitted_error),"Expected Vector= (%f, %f,%f)\n , Got Vector= (%f, %f, %f)\n", expectedvec.x, expectedvec.y, expectedvec.z, gotvec.x, gotvec.y, gotvec.z); Usually inline functions are prefered over macros. I don't know how well that works with ok though, since it might drop the line of the error and make debugging harder.

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: D3DX8: [1/13] resent: implement D3Dx__Length with a test

by Stefan Dösinger

Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 10:10:07 schrieb David.Adam(a)math.cnrs.fr: > ----- > Pièces jointes (Les liens expireront le May 1, 2008) > https://webmail.math.cnrs.fr/horde/imp/attachment.php?u=dadam%40math.cnrs.f >r&t=1192788607&f=0001-Implement-D3DX___Length-function-with-a-test.patch.pat >ch Did you forget to attachthe file?

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Use warn+heap when running 'make test'

by Alexandre Julliard

"Dan Kegel" <dank(a)kegel.com> writes: > People who run 'make test' should consider running > WINEDEBUG=warn+heap make test > instead. > > (I don't know whether we should make that the default, though. > Anyone have an opinion?) I don't think we want to make it the default, it's enough to have people try it from time to time, this way we exercise both cases. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

Oct. 19, 2007

Re: Photoshop Elements 5 Tryout?

by Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes

On Friday 19 October 2007 07:19:33 Dan Kegel wrote: > Anyone have a URL for PSE 5 trial version? > I'm updating > http://wiki.winehq.org/AdobePhotoshop > > Thanks, > Dan Any reason why you're not using the AppDB? This is exactly what it is for, and a quick search for 'Photoshop Elements' gave me a 5.0 entry with a trial link . . . Alexander N. Sørnes

Oct. 19, 2007