February 2009 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: jscript: Don't fail tests if IActiveScriptParse isn't supported

by Juan Lang

Hi Jacek, > These failures are on Win64 where we should query for different > interface. I've sent a patch to fix it: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-February/068760.html Ah, right. Sorry I missed that. --Juan

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: jscript: Don't fail tests if IActiveScriptParse isn't supported

by Jacek Caban

Hi Juan, These failures are on Win64 where we should query for different interface. I've sent a patch to fix it: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-February/068760.html Jacek

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Ben Klein

2009/2/3 Evil Jay <wine(a)eternaldusk.com>: > Eliot Blennerhassett wrote: >> "LTspice detects whether or not it's running under WINE. If so, it works >> around a few WINE issues. You can force LTspice to think it's running >> under WINE with the command line switch –wine. You can force it to think >> it's not with the command line switch –nowine in case you're interesting >> in working on WINE issues." >> > Wow... that's pretty cool of the LTspice authors to do that and not just > leave it in their own personal debug builds! As Austin says, it would be better if they submitted bugs with test cases to bugs.winehq.org. It'd be even better again if they submitted patches to Wine. What will happen when the bugs get fixed in Wine, and LTspice is still trying to work around them? I've been trying to think of some good games to demo ... http://www.spore.com/trial Spore Creature Creator runs very well and has a trial version (which sounds weird to me, a trial version of a trial version). It's also family-friendly if that's a consideration. I was going to suggest Halo: Combat Evolved, but that's probably not cute and fuzzy enough (and some of the shadows don't work properly). Apparently there's a demo of Portal. That might be a good choice too. Seems it's available via Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/app/410/

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Dan Kegel

Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Rather than working around any bugs, they should file bugs so we know > to fix them, ideally with testcases. Sometimes ISVs just want to get a product out the door. At least they have the runtime option so we can force it on or off, which is nice of them. It would be nice if someone could verify with them that we have bugs filed for everything they had to work around, and maybe wheedle out of them what the workaround they applied was.

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Evil Jay

Hmmm.... you make a pretty good point there. Hopefully it's in their plan and they just haven't had time. Austin English wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Eliot Blennerhassett > <linux(a)audioscience.com> wrote: > >> Dan Kegel wrote: >> >>> I'm going to be giving a Wine presentation at >>> Cebit next month. You can see a draft of the >>> presentation at >>> http://kegel.com/wine/cebit2009/talk.html >>> (I will say lots more than is written there; the >>> slides are kept simple on purpose, with just >>> the key idea in the caption.) >>> >>> A large part of the presentation >>> will be demos of platium-rated apps. >>> Can people suggest compelling apps to demo? >>> >> For the engineerings LTSpice >> >> http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/ltspice.jsp >> >> Its authors are wine-friendly. This from the online help >> >> "LTspice detects whether or not it's running under WINE. If so, it works >> around a few WINE issues. You can force LTspice to think it's running >> under WINE with the command line switch –wine. You can force it to think >> it's not with the command line switch –nowine in case you're interesting >> in working on WINE issues." >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Rather than working around any bugs, they should file bugs so we know > to fix them, ideally with testcases. > > A search in bugzilla shows 2 bugs with LTSpice in the name/comments. > >

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Evil Jay

Wow... that's pretty cool of the LTspice authors to do that and not just leave it in their own personal debug builds! Eliot Blennerhassett wrote: > Dan Kegel wrote: > >> I'm going to be giving a Wine presentation at >> Cebit next month. You can see a draft of the >> presentation at >> http://kegel.com/wine/cebit2009/talk.html >> (I will say lots more than is written there; the >> slides are kept simple on purpose, with just >> the key idea in the caption.) >> >> A large part of the presentation >> will be demos of platium-rated apps. >> Can people suggest compelling apps to demo? >> > > For the engineerings LTSpice > > http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/ltspice.jsp > > Its authors are wine-friendly. This from the online help > > "LTspice detects whether or not it's running under WINE. If so, it works > around a few WINE issues. You can force LTspice to think it's running > under WINE with the command line switch –wine. You can force it to think > it's not with the command line switch –nowine in case you're interesting > in working on WINE issues." > >

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Austin English

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Eliot Blennerhassett <linux(a)audioscience.com> wrote: > Dan Kegel wrote: >> I'm going to be giving a Wine presentation at >> Cebit next month. You can see a draft of the >> presentation at >> http://kegel.com/wine/cebit2009/talk.html >> (I will say lots more than is written there; the >> slides are kept simple on purpose, with just >> the key idea in the caption.) >> >> A large part of the presentation >> will be demos of platium-rated apps. >> Can people suggest compelling apps to demo? > > For the engineerings LTSpice > > http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/ltspice.jsp > > Its authors are wine-friendly. This from the online help > > "LTspice detects whether or not it's running under WINE. If so, it works > around a few WINE issues. You can force LTspice to think it's running > under WINE with the command line switch –wine. You can force it to think > it's not with the command line switch –nowine in case you're interesting > in working on WINE issues." > > > > > > Rather than working around any bugs, they should file bugs so we know to fix them, ideally with testcases. A search in bugzilla shows 2 bugs with LTSpice in the name/comments. -- -Austin

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simplify dlls/comctl32/rebar.c

by Gerald Pfeifer

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Francois Gouget wrote: >> /* case RB_SETCOLORSCHEME: */ >> /* case RB_SETPALETTE: */ >> -/* return REBAR_GetPalette (infoPtr, wParam, lParam); */ >> >> case RB_SETPARENT: > Once the commented out return has been removed it looks like > RB_SETCOLORSCHEME and RB_SETPALETTE are meant to fall through to > RB_SETPARENT, which does not seem right... > > So I'd leave a comment there, maybe /* return ...; */. That is a very fair point, thanks for raising this Francois! Let me adjust my patch accordingly. Gerald ChangeLog: Simplify. Index: dlls/comctl32/rebar.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/comctl32/rebar.c,v retrieving revision 1.166 diff -u -3 -p -r1.166 rebar.c --- dlls/comctl32/rebar.c 21 Nov 2008 12:56:20 -0000 1.166 +++ dlls/comctl32/rebar.c 3 Feb 2009 00:08:59 -0000 @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ REBAR_GetBkColor (const REBAR_INFO *info static LRESULT -REBAR_GetPalette (const REBAR_INFO *infoPtr, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam) +REBAR_GetPalette () { FIXME("empty stub!\n"); @@ -3557,7 +3557,7 @@ REBAR_WindowProc (HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, /* case RB_GETDROPTARGET: */ case RB_GETPALETTE: - return REBAR_GetPalette (infoPtr, wParam, lParam); + return REBAR_GetPalette (); case RB_GETRECT: return REBAR_GetRect (infoPtr, wParam, lParam); @@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ REBAR_WindowProc (HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, /* case RB_SETCOLORSCHEME: */ /* case RB_SETPALETTE: */ -/* return REBAR_GetPalette (infoPtr, wParam, lParam); */ +/* return REBAR_GetPalette (); */ case RB_SETPARENT: return REBAR_SetParent (infoPtr, wParam);

Feb. 3, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Eliot Blennerhassett

Dan Kegel wrote: > I'm going to be giving a Wine presentation at > Cebit next month. You can see a draft of the > presentation at > http://kegel.com/wine/cebit2009/talk.html > (I will say lots more than is written there; the > slides are kept simple on purpose, with just > the key idea in the caption.) > > A large part of the presentation > will be demos of platium-rated apps. > Can people suggest compelling apps to demo? For the engineerings LTSpice http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/ltspice.jsp Its authors are wine-friendly. This from the online help "LTspice detects whether or not it's running under WINE. If so, it works around a few WINE issues. You can force LTspice to think it's running under WINE with the command line switch –wine. You can force it to think it's not with the command line switch –nowine in case you're interesting in working on WINE issues."

Feb. 2, 2009

Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine?

by Michael Stefaniuc

Brian Vincent wrote: > Oh, by the way, I was using Fedora Core 10. I was pretty impressed with > the distro - my Intel wireless card worked out of the box and so did > sound. That's the first time I've had that happen on a Dell Latitude > notebook. However, sound in Wine didn't work at all. I made absolutely > no effort to fix it, but a quick look at the settings showed it was > trying to use ALSA. I was hoping Wine's sound had progressed to the > point where it would at least work if the underlying distro was using > sound in sane manner, which I'm kind of assuming Core 10 does. Is it a > packaging issue? Well F10 uses PulseAudio. It may work better without. I left it on on my F10 netbook as it didn't break the Wine tests; that's all I care at the moment about sound and Wine. bye michael

Feb. 2, 2009