April 2009 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Windows 7

by Austin English

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/4/3 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com>: >> I'm not sure what the dwbuildnumber should be, I can't find that >> information anywhere...Anywho, this should work. >> > RC1 was 0x1b9c, I think. Where do you get that information from? > The final build number isn't known yet, of > course, which is also a reason why it doesn't make sense to add thise > before it's actually released. That's why I didn't submit it to wine-patches ;-). -- -Austin

April 3, 2009

Re: Windows 7

by Henri Verbeet

2009/4/3 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com>: > I'm not sure what the dwbuildnumber should be, I can't find that > information anywhere...Anywho, this should work. > RC1 was 0x1b9c, I think. The final build number isn't known yet, of course, which is also a reason why it doesn't make sense to add thise before it's actually released.

April 3, 2009

Re: Windows 7

by Austin English

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Austin and I were trying to work it out last night from the Win 7 beta > :-) Is there any software on Earth that looks specifically for Windows > 7 as yet? I had my roommate try CPU-Z, but it shows Windows Vista. -- -Austin

April 3, 2009

Re: Windows 7

by David Gerard

2009/4/3 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com>: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 2. April 2009 13:07:18 schrieb Fred .: >>> Yeah, I know. >>> It is on the way though. It will be released. >>> So I would like to be able to choose Windows 7. >> Feel free to send a patch ;-) > I'm not sure what the dwbuildnumber should be, I can't find that > information anywhere...Anywho, this should work. Austin and I were trying to work it out last night from the Win 7 beta :-) Is there any software on Earth that looks specifically for Windows 7 as yet? - d.

April 3, 2009

Re: Windows 7

by Austin English

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 2. April 2009 13:07:18 schrieb Fred .: >> Yeah, I know. >> It is on the way though. It will be released. >> So I would like to be able to choose Windows 7. > Feel free to send a patch ;-) > I'm not sure what the dwbuildnumber should be, I can't find that information anywhere...Anywho, this should work. -- -Austin

April 3, 2009

Re: urlmon/misc test and the use of URLZONEREG_DEFAULT

by Paul Vriens

Paul Vriens wrote: > Paul Vriens wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just build me a fresh W2K3 box with SP2 and all updates (including >> IE7). I get some errors when I run winetest: >> >> urlmon:misc >> misc.c:884: Test failed: (1400) policy=3, expected 0 >> misc.c:884: Test failed: (1e05) policy=10000, expected 20000 >> >> This particular test test_url_action() checks the registry values >> under HKLM and then checks with >> IInternetZoneManager_GetZoneActionPolicy() if it gets the same result. >> >> Obviously that failed in my case. It turns out that the returned value >> came from HKCU and not from HKLM. >> >> So the question is, does somebody now what URLZONEREG_DEFAULT defaults >> to? HKCR or HKLM and is this always the same or are there >> circumstances that make the default different. >> >> I guess I could write a test that checks both HKLM and HKCR and >> directly modifies the registry values in both hives to see what >> IInternetZoneManager_GetZoneActionPolicy() is using. >> >> Ideas, thoughts? >> > I mentioned HKCR in this mail but that should be HKCU of course. > Ok, I see on test.winehq.org that I'm not the only one: http://test.winehq.org/data/30041c283a77903a1439bef65f96eebbdf90e461/2000_d… http://test.winehq.org/data/6b6d18d766893ff10a38a4efbbe5ef4ef8e9828b/xp_dr-… I will do some more testing and extend the tests if needed. -- Cheers, Paul.

April 3, 2009

Re: urlmon/misc test and the use of URLZONEREG_DEFAULT

by Paul Vriens

Paul Vriens wrote: > Hi, > > Just build me a fresh W2K3 box with SP2 and all updates (including IE7). > I get some errors when I run winetest: > > urlmon:misc > misc.c:884: Test failed: (1400) policy=3, expected 0 > misc.c:884: Test failed: (1e05) policy=10000, expected 20000 > > This particular test test_url_action() checks the registry values under > HKLM and then checks with IInternetZoneManager_GetZoneActionPolicy() if > it gets the same result. > > Obviously that failed in my case. It turns out that the returned value > came from HKCU and not from HKLM. > > So the question is, does somebody now what URLZONEREG_DEFAULT defaults > to? HKCR or HKLM and is this always the same or are there circumstances > that make the default different. > > I guess I could write a test that checks both HKLM and HKCR and directly > modifies the registry values in both hives to see what > IInternetZoneManager_GetZoneActionPolicy() is using. > > Ideas, thoughts? > I mentioned HKCR in this mail but that should be HKCU of course. -- Cheers, Paul.

April 3, 2009

urlmon/misc test and the use of URLZONEREG_DEFAULT

by Paul Vriens

Hi, Just build me a fresh W2K3 box with SP2 and all updates (including IE7). I get some errors when I run winetest: urlmon:misc misc.c:884: Test failed: (1400) policy=3, expected 0 misc.c:884: Test failed: (1e05) policy=10000, expected 20000 This particular test test_url_action() checks the registry values under HKLM and then checks with IInternetZoneManager_GetZoneActionPolicy() if it gets the same result. Obviously that failed in my case. It turns out that the returned value came from HKCU and not from HKLM. So the question is, does somebody now what URLZONEREG_DEFAULT defaults to? HKCR or HKLM and is this always the same or are there circumstances that make the default different. I guess I could write a test that checks both HKLM and HKCR and directly modifies the registry values in both hives to see what IInternetZoneManager_GetZoneActionPolicy() is using. Ideas, thoughts? -- Cheers, Paul.

April 3, 2009

Re: OpenBSD configure fix for cups

by Alexandre Julliard

Toni Spets <toni.spets(a)gmail.com> writes: > @@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ if test "x$with_cups" != "xno" > then > ac_save_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" > ac_cups_cflags=`cups-config --cflags 2>/dev/null` > - ac_cups_libs=`cups-config --ldflags 2>/dev/null` > + ac_cups_libs=`cups-config --ldflags --libs 2>/dev/null` > CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS $ac_cups_cflags" I'm afraid we can't do that, cups-config --libs returns a lot of crap that will break the build on many platforms. You should fix the OpenBSD libcups build to import the needed libraries. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

April 3, 2009

Re: Registry keys for serial ports

by Alexandre Julliard

Stefan Leichter <Stefan.Leichter(a)camline.com> writes: > you said in > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-November/070691.html that > registry entries for the serial ports should be created from the information > received from hal. > > i 'm planing to implement this code. But before i start coding i like to know > where the code should be created. Should the code go into > kernel32/oldconfig.c, should i start creating serenum.sys is there any other > place? It should go somewhere in mountmgr.sys for now. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

April 3, 2009