December 2010 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: comdlg32/tests: Don't test function directly when reporting GetLastError()

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7933 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit filedlg) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit filedlg) === No test summary line found

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: dsound/tests: Don't test function directly when reporting GetLastError()

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7930 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit dsound) === No test summary line found

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: setupapi/tests: Don't test function directly when reporting GetLastError() (try 2)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7929 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit devinst) === TestLauncher.c:89: Test failed: Can't open test executable C:\winetest\setupapi_test.exe, error 32 === W7PRO (32 bit devinst) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: shlwapi/tests: Don't test function directly when reporting GetLastError()

by André Hentschel

Am 29.12.2010 20:19, schrieb Marvin: > Hi, > > While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. > Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be > wrong, but could you please double-check? > Full results can be found at > http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7932 > > Your paranoid android. > > > === WINEBUILD (build) === > Patch failed to apply If you look into the log you see that Marvin really got confused -- Best Regards, André Hentschel

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: shlwapi/tests: Don't test function directly when reporting GetLastError()

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7932 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: 64-bit Notepad2 crashes

by Eric Pouech

> ELF 7f3aa090b000- 7f3aa0c3d000 Export libwine.so.1 if you've compiled wine yourself, it's strange that libwine.so doesn't contain any dwarf information maybe you're loading another instance of libwine? A+ -- Eric Pouech "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams)

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: [PATCH 1/3 resend] jscript: Don't unescape '\v'.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7912 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: [PATCH 1/3] jscript: Don't unescape '\v'.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7908 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: [PATCH 2/3] jscript: Return 'unknown' in typeof operator for native object's values that can't be retrieved

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7909 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

Dec. 29, 2010

Re: 64-bit Notepad2 crashes

by Susan Cragin

>> >On 29 December 2010 04:47, Susan Cragin <susancragin(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> Stack dump: >> >> 0x000000000022b470: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> >> 0x000000000022b480: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> >> 0x000000000022b490: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> >> 0x000000000022b4a0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> >> 0x000000000022b4b0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> >[snip] >> >> Backtrace: >> >> =>0 0x00007f3a9dd5cafb PathIsUNCW+0x7b() in shlwapi (0x000000000022b860) >> > >> >The stack has been blitzed? Or is this local variables (even though >> >PathIsUNCW doesn't have any)? It's hard to know what's going on >> >without a proper stack trace. PathIsUNCW is such a small function, the >> >problem is almost certainly further up the call chain. >> >> Well, anybody up for seeing a couple of thousand lines of WINEDEBUG-+all, or should I run relay only? >> >> There used to be a place to post log files so people could look at them... but I've forgotten where it is. > >I was not able to reproduce this here on openSUSE 11.3, >using Notepad2-4.1.24-x86-64.zip from http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html > >Is this the one you used? > >The sourcecode shows it calling PathIsUNCW just with a stackbuffer in >src/Dialog.c, which should be safe. > >Ciao, Marcus That is the one I used. To be clear about what I did, that file on the download site is an installation exe. I opened the compressed file and just used the program's exe and ini files by copying them to my home directory. I have compiled three logs, all, seh & relay, and have compressed them, and a copy of the program and ini file I used, and have downloaded all to the following. https://www.yousendit.com/download/RlRxT20zT2JYSHhjR0E9PQ I did not configure any special compiler optimizations. I am running Ubuntu's Natty 64-bit Studio with linux 2.6.37-11-generic.

Dec. 29, 2010