July 2011 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: msvcrt/tests: remove unused assignments (LLVM/Clang)

by Frédéric Delanoy

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:48, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > -- > -Austin Already sent similar patches. Not sure AJ likes those.

July 26, 2011

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ntdll: implement the NamedPipeConfiguration value for the FilePipeLocalInformation class of NtQueryInformati

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12805 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit pipe) === No test summary line found

July 26, 2011

Re: [PATCH 2/4] kernel32, ntdll, server: implement permission checks for named pipes

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12804 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit pipe) === No test summary line found

July 26, 2011

Re: [PATCH 1/4] server, ntdll: get rid of the blocking parameter for ioctls. blockingness depends on the overlapped flag for

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12803 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit pipe) === No test summary line found

July 26, 2011

Re: Questions on WINE releases and stability

by Vitaliy Margolen

On 07/25/2011 11:54 AM, louis(a)museresearch.com wrote: > - Does the development branch of WINE go through a battery of tests before > it is posted? What kind of criteria has to be met before a development > release is made available on the main page? Each applied patch have to compile and pass all conformance tests at least on Alexandre's PC. If even a single test fails, patch won't be applied. Alexandre usually picking most dramatic changes at the beginning of each release cycle for development version (2 weeks). Gradually lowering scale of changes towards the release date (every other Friday). > - It's my understanding that the stable branch only has select features > and patches ported over (from the wiki: "..with only minimal changes > merged in"). Would this mean that if I compared a stable release with a > development release from around the same time that the two releases would > have significant differences? Specifically, I'm wondering about 1.2.3 vs. > 1.3.15. The Wine development version wine-1.1.44 eventually became Wine-1.2 release. The goal of the release was to stabilize Wine (no new features where accepted for a long time, only bug fixes). And to fix number of major bugs targeted for wine-1.2 (see bugzilla for details). Wine-1.2.x are minor releases with few major show-stopper bug fixes back-ported from the development tree. Wine-1.2.1 also has number of translation additions and fixes. As well as some minor usability improvements to winecfg. > - Is 64-bit support in version 1.2.3 generally usable and stable, or is No, it's not suitable for general use. It was one of the main targets for wine-1.2 release but had lots of issues for more complex applications. > the current development release a lot more mature in that respect? Yes. Current development version should be able to run majority of simple 64-bit applications. And some big 64-bit applications with some issues. Vitaliy.

July 26, 2011

d3d8/tests: make sure to use return values (LLVM/Clang)

by Austin English

-- -Austin

July 26, 2011

Re: comdlg32/tests: make sure to use a return value (LLVM/Clang)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12798 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit itemdlg) === itemdlg: unhandled exception c0000005 at 75B94C19

July 25, 2011

Re: Updated Clang static analysis results / Valgrind update

by Austin English

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 19:15, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Web space usage was getting a bit high, so I've uploaded a tarball to > a file download service: > http://www.sendspace.com/file/5hot36 > > austin(a)aw21 ~ $ sha1sum scan-build-2011-07-02.tar.bz2 > ac3cb3920ef97641fff1f5376f8136cef01f15bf scan-build-2011-07-02.tar.bz2 > > to use, just extract and open in your favorite browser: > $ firefox index.html > > this was run against Clang from svn: clang version 3.0 (trunk 134320) > > Please send me any false positives that you'd like me to report upstream. > > Cheers, > Austin > > P.S. For those of you wanting Valgrind results, I'm currently hitting > a nasty Valgrind bug, waiting on upstream to fix: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275673 > > (Thanks to Andrew N for finding the faulty commit) Updated clang results, with: clang version 3.0 (trunk 135936) and wine-1.3.25-52-g9d7d37f are at http://www.sendspace.com/file/x81pne 77f1b2d0fdd8cb79d4caf20279b36dc047fcc325 scan-build-2011-07-25.tar.xz This gives 1815 warnings (previously had 1857). Again, if you see any false positives, please let me know so that I can report them upstream. For valgrind, see http://austinenglish.com/logs/valgrind/2011-07-25-10.19 I've disabled a few tests, to workaround valgrind bug 275673. See http://code.google.com/p/winezeug/source/diff?spec=svn2431&r=2431&format=si… I've got some more interesting stuff in the works, time permitting. Keep tuned ;-). Cheers, Austin

July 25, 2011

I need someone to present at the Desktop summit in my steed (Berlin)

by Scott Ritchie

External events are preventing me from leaving the country these next few weeks, and I'll be missing the Desktop Summit in Berlin on Monday, Aug 8th. This is the venue to talk to our friends responsible for Freedesktop.org, Gnome, KDE, Unity, and others. https://www.desktopsummit.org/program https://www.desktopsummit.org/venue The stated topic is "Making Wine less broken", although this can be more constructively phrased as "What Wine needs from the Desktop". Many of the recent problems with the Wine user experience have come from desktop environments breaking some of their historical "windows-like way" of doing things while not considering the Wine case: this conference presents us with an opportunity to engage and have Wine handled properly. Any volunteers? I'd be more than willing to talk with you personally and adapt the presentation however you like. Also if you have any particular content that you'd like to make sure gets said, post it in this thread as well :) Thanks, Scott Ritchie

July 25, 2011

Re: [PATCH] mmdevapi: Try loading multiple audio drivers from the registry

by Octavian Voicu

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Andrew Eikum <aeikum(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: + for(p = driver_name; p; p = next + 1){ + next = strchrW(p, ','); + if(next) + *next = '\0'; + + if(load_driver(p)) + return TRUE; + + TRACE("Failed to load driver: %s\n", wine_dbgstr_w(driver_name)); + } This crashes if no driver can be loaded (next will be NULL, then you'll have p = NULL + 1). Octavian

July 25, 2011