July 2011 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [1/2] cmd/tests: Add FOR /D tests (try 2)

by Frédéric Delanoy

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 22:05, Octavian Voicu <octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/7/29 Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com>: >> +rem for /d %%i in (ba*) do echo %%i>> tmp >> +rem sort < tmp >> +rem del tmp > > I believe you can also use this syntax [put for instruction in > parentheses, add | sort at the end]: > (for ... ...) | sort Yeah, but as usual, when NT4 enters in the dance... you get the picture... doesn't support the same set of arguments as later versions... Sorting is of course a very recent problem ;) BTW I quickly tested your stuff, but I get a list of "prompt>echo ..." > Btw, it's a horrible hack, but until you'll have a wine sort you can > test with (for ... ...) | Z:\usr\bin\sort :) I'm sure AJ would appreciate that a lot ;) Frédéric

July 29, 2011

Re: GSoC: dinput8 Action Mapping

by Lucas Zawacki

Hello! Here's a lot of patches with a ConfigureDevices implementation. These patches can be tested with this app I built that uses ConfigureDevices to set up a joystick action mapping (https://github.com/downloads/lfzawacki/dinput-samples/dolphin-plugin.exe) . I also tested it with the Rally Trophy and Star Sonata games. Any advice on the dialog code is appreciated, it's the first time I've coded something like this and may have missed some things. This implementation still lacks some things: * Implement username property for devices * Tracking down a bug with Rally Trophy that makes the mouse disappear while inside the ConfigureDevices dialog. * Implement the "Sort Assigned" checkbox * Some fixes to the code I'll let the code resting here while I keep working on this stuff. Cheers :)

July 29, 2011

Re: [1/2] cmd/tests: Add FOR /D tests (try 2)

by Octavian Voicu

2011/7/29 Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com>: > +rem for /d %%i in (ba*) do echo %%i>> tmp > +rem sort < tmp > +rem del tmp I believe you can also use this syntax [put for instruction in parentheses, add | sort at the end]: (for ... ...) | sort Btw, it's a horrible hack, but until you'll have a wine sort you can test with (for ... ...) | Z:\usr\bin\sort :) Octavian

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH] shell32: Disable WOW64 redirection when converting pidls to UNIX paths. (try 2, resend)

by Octavian Voicu

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> + win_skip("Not on WOW64, skipping test.\n"); > > Why a win_skip()? Isn't a normal skip() more appropriate? Year, you're right, win_skip didn't make much sense. I was only thinking at GetSystemWow64DirectoryW when I wrote that (which, is always implemented on Wine); forgot about the is_wow64 part. Thanks for the feedback! I see Alexandre committed it without the win_skip part, so it's probably better. Octavian

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH 8/9] wscript: implemented Host_get_Application (resend)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13007 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = " run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH 7/9] wscript: implemented Host_put_Interactive (resend)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13006 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = " run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH 6/9] wscript: implemented Host_get_Interactive (resend)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13005 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = " run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH 5/9] wscript: implemented Arguments2_get_length (resend)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13004 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = " run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH 4/9] wscript: implemented Arguments2_Count (resend)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13003 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = " run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "

July 29, 2011

Re: [PATCH 2/9] wscript: added arguments.c; implemented Host_get_Arguments (resend)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13001 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.FullName = " run.c:180: Test failed: test.JS: L"WScript.Path = "

July 29, 2011