July 2011 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 08/10] user32: Added GetRawInputBuffer implementation (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12187 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: [PATCH 07/10] server+user32: Added RegisterRawInputDevices implementation (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12186 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: [PATCH 06/10] server+user32: Added GetRegisteredRawInputDevices implementation (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12185 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: [PATCH 05/10] user32: Added GetRawInputDeviceInfoA implementation (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12184 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: [PATCH 04/10] server+user32: Added GetRawInputDeviceInfoW implementation (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12183 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: [PATCH 03/10] server+user32: Added GetRawInputDeviceList implementation (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12182 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: [PATCH 01/10] user32/tests: Added client-side raw input function tests (try 12)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12181 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === Timeout

July 4, 2011

Re: Glitch-free iTunes?

by Juan Lang

Hi Keith, > WINE in general does many things, and you've got a big team now. Your > contributor list shows 1250 and you've got 2M lines of code. Few of these contributors remain active. Most had small contributions. The total number of contributors obviously can only increase over time, but the number of active contributors has always remained small. But really, what are we talking about? Talk is cheap. Code isn't. Your contributions are welcome. --Juan

July 4, 2011

Re: Random crashes while running (cmd) test runner

by Marcus Meissner

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 02:01:31PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 13:37, Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > >> 2011/7/4 Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at>: > >> > Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner: > >> >> export WINEDEBUG=+heap > >> > WINEDEBUG=warn+heap adds the corruption checking but not the debug output > >> > >> I get the following: > >> batch.c:306: running TEST_BUILTINS.CMD test... > >> batch.c:215: Test failed: unexpected char 0x73 position 0 in line 1 > >> (got 'should fail', wanted 'dir') > >> batch.c:227: Test failed: too long output, got additional Volume > >> Serial Number is 0000-0000 > >> > >> (dir output) > >> > >> err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x110000: block 0x11c8a0 tail > >> overwritten at 0x11c8bc (byte 0/12 == 0x64) > >> batch: 14 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 2 failures), 0 skipped. > >> > >> See http://pastebin.com/T4E63M5S for full log and heap dump > > > > The first error appears around line 328: > > > > trace:heap:RtlAllocateHeap (0x110000,70000062,0000001c): returning 0x11c898 > > err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x110000: block 0x11c898 tail overwritten at 0x11c8b4 (byte 0/12 == 0x64) > > Heap: 0x110000 > > Next: 0x110000 Sub-heaps: 0x110014 > > Free lists: > > Block Stat Size Id > > > > It would be interesting to know what happened there in the testsuite. > > You could e.g. add +relay or similar. > > http://pastebin.com/6bV5BGQc 003c:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00110000,00000000,0000001c) ret=7effad94 trace:heap:RtlAllocateHeap (0x110000,70000062,0000001c): returning 0x1213d8 003c:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=001213d8 ret=7effad94 003c:Call KERNEL32.TlsGetValue(00000000) ret=7effc041 003c:Ret KERNEL32.TlsGetValue() retval=00120b28 ret=7effc041 003c:Call KERNEL32.TlsGetValue(00000000) ret=7effc041 003c:Ret KERNEL32.TlsGetValue() retval=00120b28 ret=7effc041 003c:Call KERNEL32.CreateFileA(7effd262 "test.cmd",40000000,00000000,00000000,00000002,00000080,00000000) ret=7effaf5a err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x110000: block 0x1213d8 tail overwritten at 0x1213f4 (byte 0/12 == 0x64) Heap: 0x110000 Next: 0x110000 Sub-heaps: 0x110014 As it happens right before the test.cmd creation, it is very likely the function static const char* replace_escaped_spaces(const char *data, DWORD size, DWORD *new_size) At least the final \0 seems not to be counted during the HeapAlloc() in this function, perhaps just adding +1 in the HeapAlloc() will help. Ciao, Marcus

July 4, 2011

Re: Random crashes while running (cmd) test runner

by Frédéric Delanoy

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 13:37, Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: >> 2011/7/4 Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at>: >> > Am 04.07.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Marcus Meissner: >> >> export WINEDEBUG=+heap >> > WINEDEBUG=warn+heap adds the corruption checking but not the debug output >> >> I get the following: >> batch.c:306: running TEST_BUILTINS.CMD test... >> batch.c:215: Test failed: unexpected char 0x73 position 0 in line 1 >> (got 'should fail', wanted 'dir') >> batch.c:227: Test failed: too long output, got additional Volume >> Serial Number is 0000-0000 >> >> (dir output) >> >> err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x110000: block 0x11c8a0 tail >> overwritten at 0x11c8bc (byte 0/12 == 0x64) >> batch: 14 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 2 failures), 0 skipped. >> >> See http://pastebin.com/T4E63M5S for full log and heap dump > > The first error appears around line 328: > > trace:heap:RtlAllocateHeap (0x110000,70000062,0000001c): returning 0x11c898 > err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x110000: block 0x11c898 tail overwritten at 0x11c8b4 (byte 0/12 == 0x64) > Heap: 0x110000 > Next: 0x110000 Sub-heaps: 0x110014 > Free lists: > Block Stat Size Id > > It would be interesting to know what happened there in the testsuite. > You could e.g. add +relay or similar. http://pastebin.com/6bV5BGQc

July 4, 2011