June 2012 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 2/2] qedit/tests: Add COM aggregation test for MediaDet.

by Michael Stefaniuc

On 07/01/2012 12:12 AM, Marvin wrote: > While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. > Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be > wrong, but could you please double-check? > Full results can be found at > http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19677 > > Your paranoid android. > > > === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit mediadet) === > mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 > mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401587 > > === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit mediadet) === > mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 > mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401587 Both hosts miss qedit.dll. bye michael

June 30, 2012

Re: [PATCH 2/2] qedit/tests: Add COM aggregation test for MediaDet.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19677 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401587 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401587

June 30, 2012

Release schedule

by Alexandre Julliard

Folks, Because of various travels and vacations (and just to keep you on your toes ;-), during the month of July I'm planning to make releases on Tuesdays instead of Fridays. So 1.5.8 will be on July 3rd, and then I'll be out for the rest of that week. Subsequent releases should happen on July 17th and 31st, and I'll also be out the first 10 days of August. And if you find this confusing, just take some vacations too ;-) -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

June 30, 2012

Re: include/basetsd.h: Fix int64 to int truncation warnings when compiling with a 64-bit PSDK compiler.

by Stefan Dösinger

Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2012, 20:50:15 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov: > Obviosuly I'm not planning to add the casts everywhere, but the inline > constructs which specifically targeting the pointer to integer conversions > that imply truncation should compile without warnings IMHO. Fwiw, I fixed a number of double-to-float conversion warnings in MSVC in wined3d, d3d8 and d3d9 a while ago, as well as some similar integer issues. I fixed most of those warnings by using the proper data types and explicitly using float literals. I added a handful of casts in places where the API differences forced me to(d3d vs GL clipplanes if I remember correctly). >From my experience with wined3d the majority warnings(~90 %) from msvc made sense and pointed out potential bugs in the code. The rest were cases like the one Dmitry wants to patch where the API definitions force a conversion with potential data loss.

June 30, 2012

Re: windowscodecs: test for TIFFSetWarningHandlerExt

by Alexandre Julliard

Daniel Lehman <dlehman(a)esri.com> writes: > Fails to build on RHEL4 with libtiff 3.6.1 > > Alternative to this is a configure test for libtiff 3.8.0, which is when the function first appears I don't think this needs a configure test. Just define the prototype explicitly instead of using typeof. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

June 29, 2012

Re: msvcp90: Fix __cdecl functions definitions that returns structures

by Alexandre Julliard

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > In code produced by gcc callee removes hidden return argument. In code > produced by MS Visual Studio caller is responsible for removing the > hidden argument. That's only for structures larger than 8 bytes, which isn't the case at least for _Getcoll. Some tests would probably be a good idea. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

June 29, 2012

Re: [1/5] d3dx9: Implement D3DXLoadVolumeFromMemory.

by Józef Kucia

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Matteo Bruni <matteo.mystral(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not quite sure of the right and bottom misalignment checks. If the > tests confirm that, of course that's okay. > Native accepts misaligned boxes, but in order to implement it S3TC decompressor and compressor is needed. I'll make it a FIXME.

June 29, 2012

user32: Add test for ComboBox repositioning behavior (try 2).

by Sergey Guralnik

Marvin wrote 29.06.2012 10:14: > Hi, > > While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new > failures. > Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I > might be > wrong, but could you please double-check? > Full results can be found at > http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19658 > > Your paranoid android. > > > === W7PRO (32 bit msg) === > msg.c:8219: Test failed: did not get zero count as expected (1). This is unrelated to my patch. -- Sergey

June 29, 2012

Re: user32: Add test for ComboBox repositioning behavior (try 2).

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19658 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit msg) === msg.c:8219: Test failed: did not get zero count as expected (1).

June 29, 2012

Re: gdiplus: Add a test to show that GdipCloneImage is not supposed to increase refcount of the source image stream, but clone it instead.

by Dmitry Timoshkov

Vincent Povirk <madewokherd(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's most likely not keeping the input stream in the new image at all. > > It's probably also worth testing SelectActiveFrame, GetPropertyItem, > and GetImageRawFormat with clones of images. Maybe they don't work. A quick test shows that SelectActiveFrame called on a clone of a multiframe gif image succeeds under nt4 and win2k, but fails under all later gdiplus implementations. Looks like a clone does not really clone anything. -- Dmitry.

June 29, 2012