August 2012 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: vcomp.dll, vcomp90.dll missing on testbot?

by Dan Kegel

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote: > Is vcomp{,90,100}.dll not installed by default on Windows? > If not, should we install it on a few of the VMs? Nevermind for the moment, I probably have a manifest problem.

Aug. 6, 2012

vcomp.dll, vcomp90.dll missing on testbot?

by Dan Kegel

I'm trying to test a better set of stubs for vcomp.dll and its ilk, but those dlls don't seem to be installed on testbot. Is vcomp{,90,100}.dll not installed by default on Windows? If not, should we install it on a few of the VMs?

Aug. 6, 2012

Re: [1/4] dwrite: Added IDWriteFont stub

by Dmitry Timoshkov

Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > +static IDWriteFontVtbl dwritefontvtbl = { > + dwritefont_QueryInterface, > + dwritefont_AddRef, > + dwritefont_Release, Vtables should be 'const' (here and in other places). -- Dmitry.

Aug. 6, 2012

Cannot run wineinstall

by Carlos Tiba

It displays the message: " You are running wineinstall as root, this is not advisable. Please rerun as a user. Aborting. " However it is not possible to install anything on Ubuntu Linux if you-re not root. The command: $ sudo ./wineinstall does not run after passwd enter because of the message above. How is it possible? Thanks Carlos Tiba

Aug. 5, 2012

Re: GSoC mentor summit 2012

by Marcus Meissner

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:20:20PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012, 16:07:52 schrieb Owen Rudge: > > It looks like the GSoC mentor summit for 2012 has been announced. Are > > any of the mentors this year interested in attending? It's happening on > > the 20th/21st October in Mountain View. > Sure, why not :-) > > That said, I've been there before, so if two other mentors who haven't been to > the summit yet want to go I am happy to yield the spot. I dont want to travel to the US just for this, so count me out ;) Ciao, Marcus

Aug. 4, 2012

Re: GSoC mentor summit 2012

by Aric Stewart

ok, then how about you two just go. That seems easy. -aric On 8/2/12 6:02 AM, Owen Rudge wrote: > On 02/08/2012 11:48, Stefan Dösinger wrote: >> Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012, 08:16:38 schrieb Aric Stewart: >>> I could be interested. I have never been and am a first time mentor. >>> October is still a bit far off for me to be able to plan. So if someone >>> else can completely commit that is cool. But I will try to get info >>> about my availability that weekend asap. >> I know that I'll have time to attend the summit, fwiw. > > Likewise, I would be fine to do so too, so it would be good for us to > get something arranged reasonably soon. I think Google wants everything > sorted by September, but the main hotel tends to fill up pretty quickly. >

Aug. 3, 2012

Re: GSoC mentor summit 2012

by Owen Rudge

On 02/08/2012 11:48, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012, 08:16:38 schrieb Aric Stewart: >> I could be interested. I have never been and am a first time mentor. >> October is still a bit far off for me to be able to plan. So if someone >> else can completely commit that is cool. But I will try to get info >> about my availability that weekend asap. > I know that I'll have time to attend the summit, fwiw. Likewise, I would be fine to do so too, so it would be good for us to get something arranged reasonably soon. I think Google wants everything sorted by September, but the main hotel tends to fill up pretty quickly. -- Owen Rudge http://www.owenrudge.net/

Aug. 2, 2012

Re: GSoC mentor summit 2012

by Stefan Dösinger

Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012, 08:16:38 schrieb Aric Stewart: > I could be interested. I have never been and am a first time mentor. > October is still a bit far off for me to be able to plan. So if someone > else can completely commit that is cool. But I will try to get info > about my availability that weekend asap. I know that I'll have time to attend the summit, fwiw.

Aug. 2, 2012

Re: winex11.drv: xrandr1.2 don't assume CRTC 0 is active

by Henri Verbeet

On 1 August 2012 17:47, Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org> wrote: > Am 01.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Henri Verbeet: >> Mostly for reference, what driver are you using? Have you explicitly >> configured a primary display at all (either through the xorg.conf >> "Primary" option for the monitor, or with the xrandr utility), or is >> it just picking up the first display connector and incorrectly >> assuming it's connected? > > > I'm using ATI driver with xorg.conf but there's no "Primary" option. Does it get any better if you add it?

Aug. 1, 2012

Re: winex11.drv: xrandr1.2 don't assume CRTC 0 is active

by Patrick Rudolph

Am 01.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > On 30 July 2012 22:05, <siro(a)das-labor.org> wrote: >> As far as I understood CRTC 0 is disabled, because it is only >> capable of >> generating analog video signals. I'm using a HDMI monitor, which is >> controlled by CRTC 1. To use multihead (not clone), you have to >> connect a >> analog (VGA) and digital monitor (in my case). Each monitor will use >> one >> CRTC and each CRTC will show a different part of the same screen. >> With this >> in mind every active CRTC should be listed as "native Windows >> monitor". > > Mostly for reference, what driver are you using? Have you explicitly > configured a primary display at all (either through the xorg.conf > "Primary" option for the monitor, or with the xrandr utility), or is > it just picking up the first display connector and incorrectly > assuming it's connected? I'm using ATI driver with xorg.conf but there's no "Primary" option. I investigated some time and found the problem: xrandr reports 0 outputs on the first disabled crtc, but there is a "connected" outputs that block this crtc. Connected means that it is plugged in weather or not it is powered or in use. This is why xrandr connects my "primary" monitor to crtc 1. After unplugging all other monitors crtc 0 is used. This example shows that with xrandr 1.2 multi-head support is necessary. To introduce multihead support every CRTC that has "connected" primary outputs should be seen as display-device. Since Windows is aware of disabled display-devices this should be no problem. EnumDisplayDevices should return all this CRTCs and let the application decide which to choose. Regards, Patrick

Aug. 1, 2012