November 2013 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

AUTHORS: Revert commit 5da31c8817293ff98b4defceb962f7d0fbc25829 (Was: How to undo authors list generated automatically.)

by Tae Wong

You want to revert the commit 5da31c8817293ff98b4defceb962f7d0fbc25829. Quintana said that it's a suggestion for it. Some Portuguese last names sorted under first instead of second element! See blob e69040d889c1748d538f1198f6c85b97f55418b5. Araujo Chaves, Pedro, Jr Arcoverde da Rocha, Augusto Castro Lopo, Erik de Example of Portuguese last names sorted by the second element: Chaves, Pedro Araujo, Jr Lopo, Erik de Castro Rocha, Augusto Arcoverde da

Nov. 7, 2013

Re: How to undo authors list generated automatically.

by Tae Wong

Please accept this suggestion to use the command in order to restore the AUTHORS list in alphabetical order by last name. -- Tae Wong

Nov. 7, 2013

Re: wininet: Check if connection is alive before sending request.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3250 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3520: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed 0 === w7pro64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3520: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed 0

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: [1/2] msctf/tests: Always set focus again explicitly for Win7+

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3245 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit inputprocessor) === inputprocessor.c:791: Test failed: Deactivation came unexpectedly

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ws2_32: Add an interactive test for interface change notifications.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3242 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (764): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (7a4): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 757C9799 === w7pro64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:528: Test failed: oob_server (968): not at the OOB mark: 1 === w864 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:1740: Test failed: sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (744): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 No test summary line found === w7pro64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:528: Test failed: oob_server (968): not at the OOB mark: 1 === w864 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:1740: Test failed: sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: How to undo authors list generated automatically.

by Tae Wong

You want to revert commit 5da31c8817293ff98b4defceb962f7d0fbc25829. It restores the authors list to the one in rough alphabetical order by last name. This is the command you'll want to use: “git revert 5da31c8817293ff98b4defceb962f7d0fbc25829” Here's a good reason for reverting the commit: “Revert commit 5da31c8817293ff98b4defceb962f7d0fbc25829.” You (seotaewong40) are banned in Mozilla Bugzilla bug tracking system for repeatedly making inaccurate statements. See Bug 594788, Comment 44 for more details. How do you remove your ban to Mozilla Bugzilla bug tracking system?

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: [PATCH 2/2] jscript: Improved error handling in numeric literal parser.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3231 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvista (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w864 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w864 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: [PATCH 1/2] jscript: Added support for octal literals.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3230 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvista (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w864 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w864 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: [2/2] user32/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3223 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit msg) === msg.c:8363: Test failed: did not get expected count for minimum timeout (54 != ~64). === w8 (32 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2790: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXMAXTRACK): expected 1044 or 1036 actual 1040 sysparams.c:2792: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYMAXTRACK): expected 788 or 780 actual 784 sysparams.c:2488: Test failed: Waiting for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message timed out sysparams.c:2501: Test failed: Set bpp 32, but WM_DISPLAYCHANGE reported bpp -1 === w864 (32 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2790: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXMAXTRACK): expected 1044 or 1036 actual 1040 sysparams.c:2792: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYMAXTRACK): expected 788 or 780 actual 784 sysparams.c:2488: Test failed: Waiting for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message timed out sysparams.c:2501: Test failed: Set bpp 32, but WM_DISPLAYCHANGE reported bpp -1 === w864 (64 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2790: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXMAXTRACK): expected 1044 or 1036 actual 1040 sysparams.c:2792: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYMAXTRACK): expected 788 or 780 actual 784

Nov. 6, 2013

Re: [1/2] user32/tests: Check return code from call to SystemParametersInfo

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3222 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2792: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXMAXTRACK): expected 1044 or 1036 actual 1040 sysparams.c:2794: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYMAXTRACK): expected 788 or 780 actual 784 sysparams.c:2490: Test failed: Waiting for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message timed out sysparams.c:2503: Test failed: Set bpp 32, but WM_DISPLAYCHANGE reported bpp -1 === w864 (32 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2792: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXMAXTRACK): expected 1044 or 1036 actual 1040 sysparams.c:2794: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYMAXTRACK): expected 788 or 780 actual 784 sysparams.c:2490: Test failed: Waiting for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message timed out sysparams.c:2503: Test failed: Set bpp 32, but WM_DISPLAYCHANGE reported bpp -1 === w864 (64 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2792: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXMAXTRACK): expected 1044 or 1036 actual 1040 sysparams.c:2794: Test failed: GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYMAXTRACK): expected 788 or 780 actual 784

Nov. 6, 2013