April 2013 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [GSOC 2013] Tools - Implement new control panel applets

by Kaiyi Zhang

Thanks for your suggestions,I'm now preparing for wine.A better idea about encryption. which i have learned.if i think i'Competent for wine development,i will apply. Thanks for you remind. 2013/4/30 André Hentschel <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> > Am 29.04.2013 05:34, schrieb Kaiyi Zhang: > > I'm Kaiyi Zhang,A Computer Science and Engineering student from > Civil Aviation University > > of China.I hear the GSOC and I'm very Interested in this,I look through > many projects until i see > > > > the "Tools - Implement new control panel applets". > > > > I have used wine for a long time,it's very useful and i love it,it > is the first time i apply for the GSOC. > > > > when i see the wine is also in the list,i decide to contribute to the > wine ,i have learned the c program > > > > language which required to this project, but i know the more things i > need to learn..I have confidence > > > > in doing this well,one of my best technologies is using the internet > ,search the information i want.. > > > > > > I send for this email to see if i'm on the right track. > > > > Look forward to you reply,Thanks for reading.. > > > > Hi Kaiyi, > thanks for the interest in Wine. > The depends on the amount and which applets you plan to implement how > difficult it will be. > With "wine control" you can have a look at existing applets and of course > you can read a bit into the source of them. > > Remember that you need to send your proposal until Friday at > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013 >

April 30, 2013

Re: [GSOC 2013] Tools - Implement new control panel applets

by André Hentschel

Am 29.04.2013 05:34, schrieb Kaiyi Zhang: > I'm Kaiyi Zhang,A Computer Science and Engineering student from Civil Aviation University > of China.I hear the GSOC and I'm very Interested in this,I look through many projects until i see > > the "Tools - Implement new control panel applets". > > I have used wine for a long time,it's very useful and i love it,it is the first time i apply for the GSOC. > > when i see the wine is also in the list,i decide to contribute to the wine ,i have learned the c program > > language which required to this project, but i know the more things i need to learn..I have confidence > > in doing this well,one of my best technologies is using the internet ,search the information i want.. > > > I send for this email to see if i'm on the right track. > > Look forward to you reply,Thanks for reading.. > Hi Kaiyi, thanks for the interest in Wine. The depends on the amount and which applets you plan to implement how difficult it will be. With "wine control" you can have a look at existing applets and of course you can read a bit into the source of them. Remember that you need to send your proposal until Friday at http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013

April 29, 2013

Re: [PATCH] kernel32: Fixed string comparision for non-canonical locale identifiers such as zh_CN VS zh-Hans on OS X.

by Ken Thomases

On Apr 29, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Qian Hong wrote: > Thanks Ken for many helps! You're welcome and, regarding the patch: looks good to me. -Ken

April 29, 2013

Re: [AppDB]: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

by Joerg Schiermeier

Hi list, > Forced moderation of comments could work for apps with maintainers > who are doing their job, but most of the spam I recently deleted was > in unmaintained apps. This will be the first step towards a better maintained AppDB! > My suggestion would be to block comments > altogether on unmaintained apps, not just because of spam, but > because of other inappropriate things that are not being monitored, > such as posting links to illegal downloads. For me it seems to be a got idea to get the maintainers more in charge also to everything around their maintained applications. I general I would like to have this submitted patch in the actual AppDB. And if it is so bad for some maintainers, they might start a new discussion here.. Thanks to all who did some work when creating an patch and wrote some issues here! -- Kindly regards Joerg Schiermeier Bielefeld/Germany

April 29, 2013

Re: opengl32: add a test for WGL_EXT_swap_control [try 2]

by Ken Thomases

On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > Updated version of the patch which marks the failing test as todo_wine. The > final goal is to make the swap interval in the winex11 driver not global > anymore (and store it with the drawable) and add some new functionality. > <0001-opengl32-add-a-test-for-WGL_EXT_swap_control.patch> For what it's worth, the Mac driver does it (apparently) wrong but in the other way. In the Mac driver, the swap interval is currently part of the context state, so not part of the drawable. But it's definitely not global. -Ken

April 29, 2013

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdi32: Clip font glyphs to fit within text metrics. (try 2)

by Alexandre Julliard

Sam Edwards <cfsworks(a)gmail.com> writes: > On 04/26/2013 08:17 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: >> Sam, look at the size of the address. It is the 64bit build that crashes. >> >> bye >> michael > > Michael: Thanks for the advice; I noticed that too and have been > running both 64-bit and 32-bit tests. (Although, it's perplexing to me > that a change like this would affect 64-bit and not 32-bit.) > > AJ: I can't reproduce the crash at all. I spoke with Marcus on > #winehackers last night and he found no test failures with the patch > either. Could you provide a backtrace on the crash, or at least run > the failing test with WINETEST_REPORT_SUCCESS=1 to give me more > information on where/how it's dying? Well, there was no backtrace since winedbg crashes. Fortunately gdb works: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff550f6b7 in get_glyph_outline (incoming_font=<optimized out>, glyph=<optimized out>, format=24, lpgm=0x20, abc=0x22c7d0, buflen=288, buf=0x538c4, lpmat=0x7ffff5535160) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c:6388 6388 ((unsigned int)src[hmul * x + rgb_interval * 2] << 0) | (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff550f6b7 in get_glyph_outline (incoming_font=<optimized out>, glyph=<optimized out>, format=24, lpgm=0x20, abc=0x22c7d0, buflen=288, buf=0x538c4, lpmat=0x7ffff5535160) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c:6388 #1 0x00007ffff550fd4e in freetype_GetGlyphOutline (dev=0x40df0, glyph=<optimized out>, format=<optimized out>, lpgm=0x22c9f0, buflen=288, buf=0x538c4, lpmat=0x7ffff5535160) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/freetype.c:7132 #2 0x00007ffff54fcd84 in GetGlyphOutlineW (hdc=<optimized out>, uChar=103, fuFormat=17, lpgm=0x22c9f0, cbBuffer=288, lpBuffer=0x538c4, lpmat2=0x7ffff5535160) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/font.c:2813 #3 0x00007ffff54c97b5 in render_string (hdc=0x490031, dib=<optimized out>, font=0x43cb0, x=95, y=11, flags=12288, str=0x51b70, count=13, dx=0x53470, clipped_rects=0x22cbb0, bounds=0x22cba0) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/dibdrv/graphics.c:707 #4 0x00007ffff54cab68 in dibdrv_ExtTextOut (dev=0x4bbe0, x=51, y=11, flags=12288, rect=<optimized out>, str=0x51b70, count=13, dx=0x53470) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/dibdrv/graphics.c:859 #5 0x00007ffff54c76c0 in windrv_ExtTextOut (dev=<optimized out>, x=51, y=11, flags=12288, rect=<optimized out>, str=<optimized out>, count=13, dx=0x53470) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/dibdrv/dc.c:738 #6 0x00007ffff54fb5d6 in ExtTextOutW (hdc=0x490031, x=51, y=11, flags=12288, lprect=0x22d310, str=0x51b70, count=13, lpDx=0x533f0) at ../../../wine/dlls/gdi32/font.c:2439 #7 0x00007ffff0fbfe73 in ScriptTextOut (hdc=<optimized out>, psc=<optimized out>, x=51, y=0, fuOptions=<optimized out>, lprc=0x22d310, psa=0x47cb4, pwcReserved=0x0, iReserved=0, pwGlyphs=0x51b70, cGlyphs=13, piAdvance=0x51bd0, piJustify=0x0, pGoffset=0x51cd0) at ../../../wine/dlls/usp10/usp10.c:3318 #8 0x00007ffff0fc03e1 in SS_ItemOut (ssa=0x45a00, iX=2, iY=0, iItem=<optimized out>, cStart=<optimized out>, cEnd=<optimized out>, uOptions=0, prc=0x45928, fSelected=0, fDisabled=0) at ../../../wine/dlls/usp10/usp10.c:2147 #9 0x00007ffff0fc0898 in ScriptStringOut (ssa=0x45a00, iX=2, iY=0, uOptions=0, prc=0x45928, iMinSel=0, iMaxSel=0, fDisabled=0) at ../../../wine/dlls/usp10/usp10.c:2211 #10 0x00007ffff584c0c6 in EDIT_PaintLine (es=<optimized out>, dc=0x490031, line=0, rev=<optimized out>) at ../../../wine/dlls/user32/edit.c:2289 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

April 29, 2013

Re: opengl32: add a test for WGL_EXT_swap_control

by Alexandre Julliard

Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> writes: > From 1a9ce7c13bef6e600bc9893f93da8770c8fc7767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:39:28 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] opengl32: add a test for WGL_EXT_swap_control > > --- > dlls/opengl32/tests/opengl.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+) It doesn't work here: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M opengl32.dll -T ../../.. -p opengl32_test.exe.so opengl.c && touch opengl.ok opengl.c:1584: Test failed: Expected swap interval 1, got 0 make[1]: *** [opengl.ok] Error 1 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

April 29, 2013

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdi32: Clip font glyphs to fit within text metrics. (try 2)

by Sam Edwards

On 04/26/2013 08:17 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > Sam, look at the size of the address. It is the 64bit build that crashes. > > bye > michael Michael: Thanks for the advice; I noticed that too and have been running both 64-bit and 32-bit tests. (Although, it's perplexing to me that a change like this would affect 64-bit and not 32-bit.) AJ: I can't reproduce the crash at all. I spoke with Marcus on #winehackers last night and he found no test failures with the patch either. Could you provide a backtrace on the crash, or at least run the failing test with WINETEST_REPORT_SUCCESS=1 to give me more information on where/how it's dying? Thanks, Sam

April 29, 2013

[GSOC 2013] Tools - Implement new control panel applets

by Kaiyi Zhang

I'm Kaiyi Zhang,A Computer Science and Engineering student from Civil Aviation University of China.I hear the GSOC and I'm very Interested in this,I look through many projects until i see the "Tools - Implement new control panel applets". I have used wine for a long time,it's very useful and i love it,it is the first time i apply for the GSOC. when i see the wine is also in the list,i decide to contribute to the wine ,i have learned the c program language which required to this project, but i know the more things i need to learn..I have confidence in doing this well,one of my best technologies is using the internet ,search the information i want.. I send for this email to see if i'm on the right track. Look forward to you reply,Thanks for reading..

April 29, 2013

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

by Rosanne DiMesio

> > So volunteer to be a maintainer. > > > > > That is all good and well, but most of the time I check the wine page > before I buy a game. If there are no maintainers and this is active, > there will be no comments, I will be unsure about the likelihood of it > working. Reports would still be helpful, but most of the time, the > majority of the information ends up in the comments section. > All the more reason to disable comments. The information belongs in test reports. Comments get deleted periodically, test reports don't. -- Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net>

April 29, 2013