November 2014 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 2/6] wined3d: Minimize device windows on focus loss (v3).

by Henri Verbeet

On 12 November 2014 22:15, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > +void wined3d_swapchain_activate(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain, BOOL activate) > +{ > + if (!activate && !(swapchain->device->create_parms.flags & WINED3DCREATE_NOWINDOWCHANGES)) > + ShowWindow(swapchain->device_window, SW_MINIMIZE); > +} This patch is mostly just blocked by the tests failing, but I'd also have to wonder if the window proc should be installed in the first place if the device is created with NOWINDOWCHANGES.

Nov. 13, 2014

Re: [5/5] windowscodecs: Implement ComponentFactory_CreateMetadataReaderFromContainer.

by Alexandre Julliard

Vincent Povirk <madewokherd(a)gmail.com> writes: > From a3735fa76b9dc568f32561eda4617e216af82138 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vincent Povirk <vincent(a)codeweavers.com> > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:51:09 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH 5/7] windowscodecs: Implement > ComponentFactory_CreateMetadataReaderFromContainer. > > --- > dlls/windowscodecs/imgfactory.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > dlls/windowscodecs/tests/metadata.c | 25 +++++---- > 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) It doesn't work here: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M windowscodecs.dll -p windowscodecs_test.exe.so metadata && touch metadata.ok metadata.c:953: Test succeeded inside todo block: unexpected count 1 make[1]: *** [metadata.ok] Error 1 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

Nov. 13, 2014

Re: ntdll/tests: Get rid of "defined but not used" warnings on non-x86(_64) platforms

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10227 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit exception) === exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 00950000/00950001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00950000 exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7C5C20B0/00950001 === wxppro (32 bit exception) === exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 00A30000/00A30001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00A30000 exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7C80DF3C/00A30001 === wvistau64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 00340000/00340001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00340000 exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7751ED97/00340001 === w2008s64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 002C0000/002C0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 002C0000 exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77E5ED97/002C0001 === w7u (32 bit exception) === exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003D0000/003D0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003D0000 exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77CDE34F/003D0001 === w8 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003E0000/003E0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003E0000 exception.c:484: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77174D17/003E0001

Nov. 13, 2014

Re: [PATCH 6/6] ddraw/tests: Test focus loss style changes.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10223 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329 === w8 (32 bit ddraw1) === ddraw1: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329 === w8 (32 bit ddraw7) === ddraw7: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329 === w8 (32 bit ddraw4) === ddraw4: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329

Nov. 13, 2014

Re: [PATCH 5/6] ddraw/tests: Test messages on focus loss.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10222 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329 === w8 (32 bit ddraw1) === ddraw1: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329 === w8 (32 bit ddraw7) === ddraw7: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329 === w8 (32 bit ddraw4) === ddraw4: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7256F329

Nov. 13, 2014

Re: [PATCH 4/6] d3d9/tests: Test style changes on focus loss.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10221 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit d3d9ex) === d3d9ex.c:2354: Test failed: Expected device window style 0x4cf0000, got 0x14cf0000, i=2. d3d9ex.c:2358: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=2. d3d9ex.c:2358: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=3. d3d9ex.c:2385: Test failed: Expected device window style 0x14cf0000, got 0x34cf0000, i=3.

Nov. 12, 2014

Re: How to loop all server objects of type = socket?

by Bruno Jesus

On Wednesday, November 12, 2014, David Quintana (gigaherz) < gigaherz(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Assuming you speak of doing this within the Win32 environment with Windows > APIs, I believe the only method available to the public is through WMI > queries. If my assumption was wrong and you want a WINE-specific method, > then sorry, I can't help you. > Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm sorry I was not very specific, I'm talking about how to do it from inside the wine server using its own methods.

Nov. 12, 2014

Re: [PATCH 2/6] wined3d: Minimize device windows on focus loss (v3).

by Stefan Dösinger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The attached archives contains follow-up patches that implement resolution changes and add tests for CreateAdditionalSwapchain. I expect that many more small fixes will be needed for some games, similar in nature to patch 19. There are also problems in some window managers (read: those forked from Metacity)for which I haven't filed bugs yet. Am 2014-11-12 22:15, schrieb Stefan Dösinger: > Tests for d3d8 will follow after 107631 has been committed. > > v3: Check for D3DCREATE_NOWINDOWCHANGES. > > v2: Move to wined3d. The different behavior in d3d9ex was due to a > hidden window and not a difference how d3d9ex handles focus loss. See > patch 7. > > Another patch will add an action (resize the window to match the > backbuffer size) on window activation. For this reason the swapchain > helper function is called on both activation and deactivation. > --- > dlls/wined3d/device.c | 5 +++++ > dlls/wined3d/swapchain.c | 6 ++++++ > dlls/wined3d/wined3d_private.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/device.c b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > index ee3636e..0de444b 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/device.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > @@ -4983,6 +4983,11 @@ LRESULT device_process_message(struct wined3d_device *device, HWND window, BOOL > } > else if (message == WM_ACTIVATEAPP) > { > + UINT i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < device->swapchain_count; i++) > + wined3d_swapchain_activate(device->swapchains[i], wparam); > + > device->device_parent->ops->activate(device->device_parent, wparam); > } > > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/swapchain.c b/dlls/wined3d/swapchain.c > index 25e2107..4c0948f 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/swapchain.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/swapchain.c > @@ -1175,3 +1175,9 @@ void swapchain_update_draw_bindings(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain) > wined3d_resource_update_draw_binding(&swapchain->back_buffers[i]->resource); > } > } > + > +void wined3d_swapchain_activate(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain, BOOL activate) > +{ > + if (!activate && !(swapchain->device->create_parms.flags & WINED3DCREATE_NOWINDOWCHANGES)) > + ShowWindow(swapchain->device_window, SW_MINIMIZE); > +} > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/wined3d_private.h b/dlls/wined3d/wined3d_private.h > index 0f302c4..5f90e9a 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/wined3d_private.h > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/wined3d_private.h > @@ -2701,6 +2701,7 @@ struct wined3d_swapchain > > void x11_copy_to_screen(const struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain, const RECT *rect) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > > +void wined3d_swapchain_activate(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain, BOOL activate) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > struct wined3d_context *swapchain_get_context(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > void swapchain_destroy_contexts(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > HDC swapchain_get_backup_dc(struct wined3d_swapchain *swapchain) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUY883AAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwU/EP/2AAyRwHeT/rJJt1ocC3EgSq ttCBQSjH0plrsm1y+zIfFJ6+iNFfXooO1ub3qC980Ub32v5EV7p9yUxbbvfpRt1T aF7kh5WDfbPvpkGdAKmSo7C3gCzHratuPxLokDIiHAKnqhsknFmIr6dwVfaYKqmd 1eoJghdpuapyQ5TiTblU54b6tuTLyWmyZlxDNHFUSQaBCLvC7pR5eXo7nvARwYLK ahP87S7htMA+rqudvctwkPNWEa7F3dSayWyLoOp6qW3abBwfpbBAWS9KEfCztc6i zAE6LOuVy9IWewmZ5j87DNZJmKSJj/tgMHhdJ5BHxEcyJALjdg4qSsgp9olFBkpm 0DXjc0qlqdrdFiNMPG2y5i6N5vMuT9srVgDEjFAW40dnu3aEPSqHmPqKhDVrAs8s Ci3G9mV4uDK4JNI/sWJd632yWaDHGNZSdZYETof3DaR6a6K8IMktG0vqBKrapZ2K RzWz8DEonbIx5W1mKQROr5Wj+0Qs5+AkeQoWbWFEYuubtU0oisp3evRCPtjCLXjB GSwObVGohUNdwiVonYCAXtu3C80HNYwMGObcoB7p9ok3RQc60e6gOb1RdshfTcvF e4oEWOHOdqmbtj8gqLftx1qsnwPmK4gHc6ho2KfXaAZTnQdkdeUw6VG+pkNUxwJb zj94p5A5sSlJEUTmCnyx =LNWo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Nov. 12, 2014

Re: How to loop all server objects of type = socket?

by David Quintana (gigaherz)

Assuming you speak of doing this within the Win32 environment with Windows APIs, I believe the only method available to the public is through WMI queries. If my assumption was wrong and you want a WINE-specific method, then sorry, I can't help you. On 12 November 2014 18:10, Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, I'm wondering how to do some sort of loop to be able to check > all currently opened sockets. If possible knowing the process which > they belong to. Any hints are welcome. > > Best regards, > Bruno > > >

Nov. 12, 2014

How to loop all server objects of type = socket?

by Bruno Jesus

Hi all, I'm wondering how to do some sort of loop to be able to check all currently opened sockets. If possible knowing the process which they belong to. Any hints are welcome. Best regards, Bruno

Nov. 12, 2014