February 2014 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 6/6] d3d9/tests: Add tests for different YUV texture layouts

by Stefan Dösinger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2014-02-12 11:20, schrieb Stefan Dösinger: > Am 2014-02-11 14:23, schrieb Martin Storsjö: >> Yes - now I extended the test to use a non-power-of-two texture >> size, and if I hack out the ARB_TEXTURE_NON_POWER_OF_TWO support >> (in wined3d/directx.c) the tests fail and crash. > Alright, I guess I should have a look at it. It looks like I screwed up heightscale handling with my recent surface memory management rework. YUY2 and UYVY are regular block-based formats, but YV12, NV12 and I420 are not. The block-based properties of those 3 formats (or lack thereof) could use some tests as well. I think I didn't test YV12 when I wrote / updated test_surface_blocks and test_volume_blocks in dlls/d3d9/tests/device.c because none of my cards supported it in d3d9. Maybe that's different with I420 and NV12 - I haven't checked on Windows yet. Ddraw has some YV12 tests in dlls/ddraw/tests/overlay.c. It shows that this format does not use a block-based offset calculation. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS+069AAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwNAgP/A8tEN/u8cCzQLB+6AHAf2u+ 7NXGlVp/Fg5j3PCxjJZCF2KbRpfB95uw1NdLhK5RsIdMIc1Hp+5yqegCUysLu7hk YDxyg0Vpf7DpT5Dla2VCgRNo1EhdHTTtXCXmMiIcIEbNMnVNNiQFpzSU9LUg3XEc RqfyNHYB1jZL0DsaqjY4IcvKubxlb0biVmZr6+473lAzNYobstZbpQ1Bh/m7Inwk Sqed3dlsasP9C30Bz91M079no5g5sW6kR0Ve8eiXgWEEqAYdqCRUBXxEqRU5n4Fz ZwUj2FNeBgv/uxLqRf5Qc4e0FnbX3CyVrN/Re+Famko+ELze16oQ7azcZXnGx5iw KdBLauQkPP5rg2exl8PeJaJirjjRkm1IAsgWMhzZzZSUQX+rljVtwF6zeZrdQz7u 3TZ2OpmyTkrp33o+HeEHmeK7v6JRuhS6JVFESUDMAJTtc0aXD4R8dqrK+qj0FZVc UM34QRc+i57EAVFIdcIeHWINNe2KWB7sqL62UvITHNEwp2S6nrFlRpUK4AHqtRQ1 YDI/qpTKUDDrNSggJ2bUOsYWzO7UWE19FRy5gWGra3KoamNVYkOSQA06oY2x8+1S /fSf7hs9ZmFj3tSrNet+IiSIWTfSQy9cE3Dwy1Dpc5Ywwl6Gzc06hLH1nCZdeC5N pyFGw3SzvnHEe3BjdImM =pafk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Feb. 12, 2014

Re: [PATCH 6/6] d3d9/tests: Add tests for different YUV texture layouts

by Stefan Dösinger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2014-02-11 14:23, schrieb Martin Storsjö: > Yes - now I extended the test to use a non-power-of-two texture > size, and if I hack out the ARB_TEXTURE_NON_POWER_OF_TWO support > (in wined3d/directx.c) the tests fail and crash. Alright, I guess I should have a look at it. On which Windows systems(Windows version, GPU) did you test your test? I know that there are plenty of differences in YUV handling, so I'd like to run the tests on some of my Windows installations too. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS+0r+AAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwqGAP/A68ghy8wMyYn/eioC2T/WbY pA47v2lGAMEZmVhBuJHX9YY+VkjO4l1xd8lPsGtnCs0eNXcoEUtonrs39LSv//w8 VeT2EuVmyl6KboA4uf3gVXKudZRvGmWwMMJmAlzPuTO+Dmll5Sm4bf/fJ0VIDj1c oKUS+D0MRJJPEab0g/irXzJDNIcmHZcXaJ30VaUYgkHx3c+2iRTDUhwKYj4ygxb1 TOA/PpTfn8Y6ZXhY9u8QWK2sSjHfDNA3JTa85CJJ/QyWhJ717/RwXek5MSMFqcml Pb4uit/BoAiddaVSty2esazBjbsa8tC3Mp3a2iTzB60NGMYo4Oh8MV6OiPxMVFH3 fH4lRcQrTZ7kYILLZgoEpgPAAzjPhp2QwRaIK5GzcO4vy4yhQasX09lN/oXAgM93 vTJZzMdcbKqI+OMSMoqbzsH7yeJUXtQXIRB18azK0/Vv/Vo3Oy8j+vJmK8HTe8Cs KqS828yuOJCZAt5s0ZNYguiOYRpkC/1AteULxO9oQYUioWeWZC2KlBME5sdpDTLH pJx0GpIqSwEIIwNBSqa9Pr9Xa2EWrK2bOwCphgkSPAVV2U/RQ7SIroWC8opVBlN+ EU+rFMuV4ASXnDe8u1PU2xGW7Xs4YbjEWoPeU33hF1obqdY0H6RFFH/ZA+rqh61Q tfjvovHdl0ynDaVg+A8p =OpGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Feb. 12, 2014

Re: ddraw/tests: Skip the primary palette tests if the 640x480x8 mode is not supported.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4809 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2.c:3231: Test failed: SetDisplayMode failed, hr 0x80004001.

Feb. 12, 2014

Re: [PATCH 2/4] qedit/tests: Expand the SampleGrabber COM tests.

by Michael Stefaniuc

On 02/12/2014 01:18 AM, Marvin wrote: > While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. > Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be > wrong, but could you please double-check? > Full results can be found at > https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4795 > > Your paranoid android. > > > === w2008s64 (32 bit mediadet) === > mediadet.c:150: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 > mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401857 > > === w2008s64 (64 bit mediadet) === > mediadet.c:150: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 > mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000004017B5 The classic "dll is missing and tests are skipped by winetest.exe". Same for patch 4/4. bye michael

Feb. 12, 2014

Re: How can I get a bugzilla database dump?

by Austin English

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Scott Ritchie <scottritchie(a)ubuntu.com>wrote: > A volunteer and I have been working on a secret prototype project for > Wine, but before showing it to the world I'd like to demo how it would > tie in to bugzilla. > > To do this, it would be easiest to just have a copy of our current > database. Is this an easy thing to get for me? > > Thanks, > Scott Ritchie > > > ftp://ftp.winehq.org/pub/wine/wine-bugzilla-20140212.tar.gz -- -Austin

Feb. 12, 2014

How can I get a bugzilla database dump?

by Scott Ritchie

A volunteer and I have been working on a secret prototype project for Wine, but before showing it to the world I'd like to demo how it would tie in to bugzilla. To do this, it would be easiest to just have a copy of our current database. Is this an easy thing to get for me? Thanks, Scott Ritchie

Feb. 11, 2014

Re: ws2_32/tests: Add WSAEnumNameSpaceProviders[A|W] tests (try 2)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4799 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:559: Test failed: oob_server (b30): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:559: Test failed: oob_server (750): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:559: Test failed: oob_server (654): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007FEFE4C9CD9

Feb. 11, 2014

Re: ws2_32/tests: Add WSAEnumNameSpaceProviders[A|W] tests

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4798 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Make failed

Feb. 11, 2014

Re: [PATCH 4/4] qedit/tests: COM tests for IEnumPins from SampleGrabber.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4796 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:150: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401857 === w2008s64 (64 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:150: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000004017BD

Feb. 11, 2014

Re: [PATCH 2/4] qedit/tests: Expand the SampleGrabber COM tests.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4795 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:150: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401857 === w2008s64 (64 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:150: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000004017B5

Feb. 11, 2014