February 2014 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [Tools] winetest: Make the WineTest executable links more visible.

by André Hentschel

Am 07.02.2014 18:31, schrieb Alexandre Julliard: > Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes: > >> --- >> >> As per WineConf. >> Note that the choice of a 'legend' class rather than nothing or some >> other class is mostly a matter of taste. > > I don't think that users not finding the test binary is a major > problem. A better approach would be to add some help page on the wiki > and link to that. > After fosdem i checked that again and in fact i think we link quite good to it: wiki.winehq.org/ConformanceTests

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: kernel32: In FindFirstFileExW(), call NtQueryDirectoryFile() again to determine if it read all files.

by Ken Thomases

On Feb 7, 2014, at 5:59 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Ken Thomases <ken(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > >> On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:37 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: >> >>> Ken Thomases <ken(a)codeweavers.com> writes: >>> >>>> I'm open to suggestions for other ways to fix it. Can a directory >>>> handle be made to carry additional state? >>> >>> Not at this point, but we probably want to add a mechanism for that and >>> get rid of the whole getdirentries mess. >> >> Instead of getdirentries(), we'd use readdir()? And the extra state would be an index of the next entry to return (so NtQueryDirectoryFile() would skip that many entries, unless told to restart)? >> >> Or did you have something else in mind? > > My plan is rather to move the caching of the whole directory from > kernel32 to ntdll. Hmm. Isn't a file handle potentially shared among processes? How would the cache, as well as the read position within it, be coordinated? -Ken

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: Preferred License for Presentations?

by Michael Stefaniuc

On 02/07/2014 06:34 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote: > Is there any reason not to just choose the most permissive one? I already went with Creative Commons. bye michael

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: Preferred License for Presentations?

by Vincent Povirk

Is there any reason not to just choose the most permissive one?

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: [Tools] winetest: Make the WineTest executable links more visible.

by Alexandre Julliard

Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes: > --- > > As per WineConf. > Note that the choice of a 'legend' class rather than nothing or some > other class is mostly a matter of taste. I don't think that users not finding the test binary is a major problem. A better approach would be to add some help page on the wiki and link to that. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: Call for updating recent news queue

by Rosanne DiMesio

On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:42:12 +0100 André Hentschel <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> wrote: > So it would be nice if everyone could have a look at: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/RecentNewsQueue > > and update it again. I know this worked last time, but we had no WWN for it. Even if this will be my first try to push out a WWN, i'll make sure this won't happen this time. > Thanks in advance > It might be a good idea to start by deleting most of what's there now--that stuff is 4 years old. However, some of the info about the old testbot might be usable in an updated article on the new testbot. One thing I have to ask, though: who is the target audience for WWN? It always seemed to me to be too technical for users and not technical enough for developers. -- Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net>

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3d9/tests: Test that Direct3D restores the pixel format on the window it targets. (try 2)

by Henri Verbeet

On 7 February 2014 02:13, Ken Thomases <ken(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > > + ZeroMemory(&present_parameters, sizeof(present_parameters)); > + present_parameters.Windowed = TRUE; > + present_parameters.hDeviceWindow = hwnd; > + present_parameters.SwapEffect = D3DSWAPEFFECT_DISCARD; > + > + hr = IDirect3D9_CreateDevice(d3d9, D3DADAPTER_DEFAULT, D3DDEVTYPE_HAL, > + hwnd, D3DCREATE_SOFTWARE_VERTEXPROCESSING, &present_parameters, &device); > + if (FAILED(hr) || !device) > + { > + skip("Failed to create device\n"); > + goto cleanup; > + } Please use create_device() for creating the device, unless there's some reason it can't work here. > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_Present(device, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Present failed %#x\n", hr); I think an interesting test would be Present() with a non-NULL destination window. I'd also like the equivalent test for d3d8, and ddraw with a clip window.

Feb. 7, 2014

Preferred License for Presentations?

by Michael Stefaniuc

Hello guys, what license do we prefer to use for Wine presentations and the related material? For the LinuxTag presentation I have the option to pick one of: - Creative Commons License - UVM Lizenz für die freie Nutzung unveränderter Inhalte - GNU General Public License - UVM Lizenz für Freie Inhalte - GNU Free Documentation License thanks bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 Supervisor, APAC/EMEA IT Network/Telephony Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14, 85630 Grasbrunn Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243 Geschäftsführer: Mark Hegarty, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: questionarie

by Akihiro Sagawa

On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:01:55 +0900, Akira Nakagawa wrote: > Why my patch,101880 and 102083 are not commited? > They have no problem,certified by Akihiro. I know translation is important to Japanese users. But I can't approve your patches at this time. There are some points to need improvement. Patch 101880 (po file update): Translation looks good for me. I'm not sure why your patch is `New' status. But, if I were you, I would (1) remove X-Generator (redundant) header and (2) add explanation why translator mail address needs to update, then resubmit. Patch 102083 (Japanese man page): There are no update descriptions, thus it's not so easy to figure out your changes. From my point of view, my comments on Jan 22 are completely ignored in revised version. At least, I'd like to know why my comment isn't suitable. On a different note, please don't forget to set your e-mail client to send your English name. Awaiting your feedback. Regards, Akihiro Sagawa

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: kernel32: In FindFirstFileExW(), call NtQueryDirectoryFile() again to determine if it read all files.

by Alexandre Julliard

Ken Thomases <ken(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:37 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > >> Ken Thomases <ken(a)codeweavers.com> writes: >> >>> I'm open to suggestions for other ways to fix it. Can a directory >>> handle be made to carry additional state? >> >> Not at this point, but we probably want to add a mechanism for that and >> get rid of the whole getdirentries mess. > > Instead of getdirentries(), we'd use readdir()? And the extra state would be an index of the next entry to return (so NtQueryDirectoryFile() would skip that many entries, unless told to restart)? > > Or did you have something else in mind? My plan is rather to move the caching of the whole directory from kernel32 to ntdll. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

Feb. 7, 2014