June 2014 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

XFORM matrix and rotation bug

by Alexander Almaleh

While working on the previous bug with PlgBlt(), I noticed there is another one with the XFORM matrix. I've submitted a bug report at https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36815 . I want to try to debug it and find a solution, but I need some help. Can someone tell me where the code is where the XFORM matrix is used to transform the coordinates? I mean where the actual blitting is done. Also, how is it done? Does wine use an internal buffer and all the operations are made manually, or does it just translate the blitting operations to the X server?

June 28, 2014

Re: Test bot error unrelated to patch, should I resend?

by Frédéric Delanoy

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Joris van der Wel <joris(a)jorisvanderwel.com> wrote: > After I submitted a patch the testbot failed because of an error unrelated > to my patch: > > === build (build) === > Could not copy the patch to the VM: the "nc -q0 '10.42.42.130' '4242'" > command returned 1 > > Should I resend my patch, or will this be resolved on its own? It's generally a temporary error, so please resend. If it persists, you can contact François Gouget, who manages the testbot. -- Frédéric Delanoy

June 28, 2014

Re: mshtml/tests: Fix a memory leak (valgrind).

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7746 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00090100 === wxppro (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc: unhandled exception c0000005 at 3C8363A7 === wvistau64 (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === w7u (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2863: Test failed: unexpected command 74 The test timed out === w8 (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2863: Test failed: unexpected command 74 htmldoc.c:2863: Test failed: unexpected command 74 htmldoc.c:2863: Test failed: unexpected command 74 htmldoc.c:6113: Test failed: LoadHistory failed: 80070057 htmldoc.c:6117: Test failed: expected FireBeforeNavigate2 htmldoc.c:6118: Test failed: expected Invoke_AMBIENT_SILENT htmldoc.c:6119: Test failed: expected Invoke_AMBIENT_OFFLINEIFNOTCONNECTED htmldoc.c:2781: Test failed: unexpected state L"uninitialized", expected 1 htmldoc.c:2781: Test failed: VT_I4(out)=0, expected 1 htmldoc.c:367: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:5666: Test failed: unexpected state L"uninitialized", expected 1 htmldoc.c:5666: Test failed: VT_I4(out)=0, expected 1 htmldoc.c:2781: Test failed: unexpected state L"uninitialized", expected 1 htmldoc.c:2781: Test failed: VT_I4(out)=0, expected 1 htmldoc.c:2781: Test failed: unexpected state L"uninitialized", expected 1 htmldoc.c:2781: Test failed: VT_I4(out)=0, expected 1 The test timed out === wvistau64 (64 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000000007137D8A6

June 28, 2014

Re: [PATCH 3/4] vbscript: Implemented Sgn(try 4)

by Shuai Meng

Thank you Piotr. Yes, Sgn(Null) will return error, so do conversion functions. I wonder whether should I send some patches to fix the conversion functions. As for Sgn(Null), I don't know how describe this error, I mean, I can't match the error_const_value between wine and windows document. For example, when Err.number = 458, it is described as DISP_E_BADVERTYPE in wine while in windows document it is Variable uses an Automation type not supported in VBScript <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/93dk459a(v=vs.84).aspx> ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xe43cc8d(v=vs.84).aspx) I have found that when Sgn(Null) is called, Err.number = 94, this error is described as Invalid use of Null <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/c6ct86c6(v=vs.84).aspx>, but I can't find the correspond description in wine/include/winerror.h. So I shall be very grateful if you can offer some hints. 2014-06-27 17:42 GMT+08:00 Piotr Caban <piotr.caban(a)gmail.com>: > Please add VT_NULL argument handling and tests. This function is returning > error on Sgn(Null) call. >

June 28, 2014

Test bot error unrelated to patch, should I resend?

by Joris van der Wel

After I submitted a patch the testbot failed because of an error unrelated to my patch: === build (build) === Could not copy the patch to the VM: the "nc -q0 '10.42.42.130' '4242'" command returned 1 Should I resend my patch, or will this be resolved on its own? Thanks

June 27, 2014

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmdevapi: Don't stop sending event signals after IAudioClient::Stop

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7740 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit capture) === capture.c:427: Test failed: Wait(event) after Stop gave 102 === w8 (32 bit capture) === capture.c:228: Test failed: Position 1655 expected 823 capture.c:256: Test failed: Position 1655 expected 823 capture.c:307: Test failed: expect DISCONTINUITY 0 capture.c:313: Test failed: Position 2103 gap 832 capture.c:333: Test failed: Position 3063 expected 1719 capture.c:334: Test failed: flags 1 capture.c:358: Test failed: Position 4215 expected 2167 === w7u (32 bit render) === render.c:1976: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.501088 render.c:2005: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.501088 === w8 (32 bit render) === render.c:1976: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.671337 render.c:2005: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.671337

June 27, 2014

Re: New WineHQ Server

by Jerome Leclanche

Congrats on the new server guys. And thanks to the anonymous donor. :) J. Leclanche On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jeremy White <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > As you probably saw, we have deployed a new server to replace our 5 year old > work horse. This new server will hopefully hold us for the next 5 years. > It's got good specs; 6 core Xeon, 32G of RAM (easily expandable to 128), > raid 10 (also easily expandable). > > In a particularly nice development, this server was purchased by the > Software Freedom Conservancy using funds provided by a donor. This donor > doesn't want a particularly big fuss made out of it, and so prefers that I > not announce a name publicly. > > I'd like to thread this needle somewhat carefully, as *I* think it's a > remarkably generous gift. So I propose that, at our next convenient > opportunity, we all lift a glass in appreciation of anonymous donors > everywhere! > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > >

June 27, 2014

New WineHQ Server

by Jeremy White

Hi Folks, As you probably saw, we have deployed a new server to replace our 5 year old work horse. This new server will hopefully hold us for the next 5 years. It's got good specs; 6 core Xeon, 32G of RAM (easily expandable to 128), raid 10 (also easily expandable). In a particularly nice development, this server was purchased by the Software Freedom Conservancy using funds provided by a donor. This donor doesn't want a particularly big fuss made out of it, and so prefers that I not announce a name publicly. I'd like to thread this needle somewhat carefully, as *I* think it's a remarkably generous gift. So I propose that, at our next convenient opportunity, we all lift a glass in appreciation of anonymous donors everywhere! Cheers, Jeremy

June 27, 2014

Re: [PATCH 1/4] vbscript: Implemented TypeName(try 4)

by Shuai Meng

2014-06-27 17:37 GMT+08:00 Piotr Caban <piotr.caban(a)gmail.com>: > This patch was already committed. Please update wine source before sending > patches. > > Thank you Piotr, but this patch is not completed, I think I should resend it. If not, maybe I can add some getVT tests to it. > Cheers, > Piotr >

June 27, 2014

Re: [PATCH 2/5] d3d8/tests: Add some lost device tests.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7731 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit device) === device.c:2397: Test failed: Expected foreground window 000B00CA, got 0002004C. device.c:3039: Test failed: Expected wndproc 0x412780, got 0x412780.

June 27, 2014