March 2015 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 4)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12481 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

March 28, 2015

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 3)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12480 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

March 28, 2015

Re: [2/9] kernel32/tests: Add tests for IsProcessInJob.

by Andrew Cook

w7u has been misbehaving on these tests, they work locally and on every other vm. On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 00:07 -0500, Marvin wrote: > Hi, > > While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. > Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be > wrong, but could you please double-check? > Full results can be found at > https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12470 > > Your paranoid android. > > > === w7u (32 bit process) === > process.c:2177: Test failed: WaitForSingleObject returned 258

March 28, 2015

Re: [2/9] kernel32/tests: Add tests for IsProcessInJob.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12470 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit process) === process.c:2177: Test failed: WaitForSingleObject returned 258

March 28, 2015

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 2)

by Shuai Meng

Hi, I find Oct("test") returns error number 13 on windows, while 445 on wine. So I shall resend this patch. 2015-03-27 23:28 GMT+08:00 Shuai Meng <mengshuaicalendr(a)gmail.com>: > testbot: > https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12461 > Changelog: > Added support for other subtypes; > Added more tests. > --- > dlls/vbscript/global.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > +++++++++++++-- > dlls/vbscript/tests/api.vbs | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >

March 28, 2015

Re: winegcc & stdin

by Leon Bogaert

Thanks! I've filed a bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38300 On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Leon Bogaert <leonbogaert(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm getting an error when using winegcc with stdin: > > > >> > >> $ cat test.c | winegcc -xc -c - > >> gcc: warning: ‘-x c’ after last input file has no effect > >> gcc: error: -E or -x required when input is from standard input > >> winegcc: gcc failed > > > > > > Does anyone know what I could be doing wrong? I'm trying to use stdin > > because that's what the go (cgo) build tool is trying to use. > I think it's not you who does something wrong, it's winegcc which runs > gcc a bit wrongly. If you look at gcc command line arguments, you'll > get something like > > -fshort-wchar -DWINE_UNICODE_NATIVE -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DWIN64 > -D_WIN64 -D__WIN64 -D__WIN64__ -DWIN32 -D_WIN32 -D__WIN32 -D__WIN32__ > -D__WINNT -D__WINNT__ -D__stdcall=__attribute__((ms_abi)) > -D__cdecl=__attribute__((ms_abi)) -D_stdcall=__attribute__((ms_abi)) > -D_cdecl=__attribute__((ms_abi)) -D__fastcall=__attribute__((ms_abi)) > -D_fastcall=__attribute__((ms_abi)) -D__declspec(x)=__declspec_##x > -D__declspec_align(x)=__attribute__((aligned(x))) > -D__declspec_allocate(x)=__attribute__((section(x))) > -D__declspec_deprecated=__attribute__((deprecated)) > -D__declspec_dllimport=__attribute__((dllimport)) > -D__declspec_dllexport=__attribute__((dllexport)) > -D__declspec_naked=__attribute__((naked)) > -D__declspec_noinline=__attribute__((noinline)) > -D__declspec_noreturn=__attribute__((noreturn)) > -D__declspec_nothrow=__attribute__((nothrow)) > -D__declspec_novtable=__attribute__(()) > -D__declspec_selectany=__attribute__((weak)) > -D__declspec_thread=__thread -D__int8=char -D__int16=short > -D__int32=int -D__int64=long -D__WINE__ -c - -xc > -isystem/usr/include/wine/windows > > Notice that '-xc' has moved after '-c -'. Maybe this should be > considered a bug of winegcc. > > > > > Leon > > > > > > > > Ruslan >

March 27, 2015

Re: [PATCH] icnsformat.c: wrong pointer to formal parameters

by Bruno Jesus

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Isakov <isakov-sl(a)bk.ru> wrote: > Bug 38288 > Wrong pointer in icnsformat.c IcnsFrameEncode_WriteSource Hi Sergey. Usually the patch subject is the dll name followed by the change. I think a better subject in this case would be: windowscodecs: Fix wrong pointer to formal parameter

March 27, 2015

[GSOC 2015] Direct3DRM - Implement rendering for D3DRM

by Aaryaman Vasishta

Hello! I have submitted my proposal on melange. Please take a look at it whenever possible. Any feedback would be very appreciated. Thank You! jam

March 27, 2015

Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] icons in nanocad have black background

by Bruno Jesus

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Hi, Andrey. > The issue was originally described here: > https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34825 > > I bisected both issues, but I'll create separate thread to the issue > with file dialog. > > First bad commit that causes black background on icons is: > [ b81a7d976e3c3de36a01401d125871d3014e6c67 ] > gdi32: Always use the DIB engine for monochrome bitmap rendering. Thanks for the hard work. Bug 34825 was not a good bug example because it was never filled properly and never had logs before getting resolved as abandoned. I think the best we can do now is a fresh start: open 2 new bugs one for each problem (as per wine's bugzilla standards). You can use the same contents from the email. If the software is freely (legally) available in the internet you can also set the bug URL to point to the download page and add the "download" keyword so other people can reproduce. Best wishes, Bruno

March 27, 2015

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 2)

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12462 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

March 27, 2015