November 2016 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Undocumented function prototype

by Marco Savelli

Of course, but as you can see someone stubbed it. Maybe it's just of academic interest, after all Il giorno ven 25 nov 2016 alle ore 23:34 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 26.11.2016 1:17, Marco Savelli wrote: > > Hi everybody! I'm new to this list. > > > > I found this page (in deutsch) which seems to document an otherwise > > undocumented function, namely GetPermLayers from aphelp.dll. > > > > I don't know where they got it, but seems a realistic definition. > > > > Hope it helps. And thanks for your development effort, go on this way! :D > > > > > > P.S. It' in delphi, there's a "var" keyword, which should means (from > > google, I'm not a delphist) an optional argument. IDA PRO gives error > > when given the last two args. Hope you can figure out where's the problem > > > > 'Var' means that argument is passed by reference rather than by value. > Anyway, if function is undocumented it's unlikely that many applications > will be using it. > > > >

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: Undocumented function prototype

by Nikolay Sivov

On 26.11.2016 1:17, Marco Savelli wrote: > Hi everybody! I'm new to this list. > > I found this page (in deutsch) which seems to document an otherwise > undocumented function, namely GetPermLayers from aphelp.dll. > > I don't know where they got it, but seems a realistic definition. > > Hope it helps. And thanks for your development effort, go on this way! :D > > > P.S. It' in delphi, there's a "var" keyword, which should means (from > google, I'm not a delphist) an optional argument. IDA PRO gives error > when given the last two args. Hope you can figure out where's the problem > 'Var' means that argument is passed by reference rather than by value. Anyway, if function is undocumented it's unlikely that many applications will be using it.

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: Undocumented function prototype

by Marco Savelli

Sorry, the link didn't copy, here it is: http://www.delphipraxis.net/845969-post3.html Il giorno ven 25 nov 2016 alle ore 23:17 Marco Savelli <svlmrc(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi everybody! I'm new to this list. > > I found this page (in deutsch) which seems to document an otherwise > undocumented function, namely GetPermLayers from aphelp.dll. > > I don't know where they got it, but seems a realistic definition. > > Hope it helps. And thanks for your development effort, go on this way! :D > > > P.S. It' in delphi, there's a "var" keyword, which should means (from > google, I'm not a delphist) an optional argument. IDA PRO gives error when > given the last two args. Hope you can figure out where's the problem >

Nov. 25, 2016

Undocumented function prototype

by Marco Savelli

Hi everybody! I'm new to this list. I found this page (in deutsch) which seems to document an otherwise undocumented function, namely GetPermLayers from aphelp.dll. I don't know where they got it, but seems a realistic definition. Hope it helps. And thanks for your development effort, go on this way! :D P.S. It' in delphi, there's a "var" keyword, which should means (from google, I'm not a delphist) an optional argument. IDA PRO gives error when given the last two args. Hope you can figure out where's the problem

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: Testing Direct3D

by Stefan Dösinger

Am 2016-11-24 um 19:47 schrieb Fabian Maurer: > AFAIK the wine TestBot is only running VMs, too. Is there any way to run a > meaningful test without having my own windows machine? Not really. You really want to have a real Windows machine if you want to do d3d development. The testbot VMs do help with some things (e.g. the d3d reference counting is implemented in Microsoft's part of the d3d stack), but our tests are full with broken() statements that accept behavior from VMs that are known to break games. If you need some one off test runs you can send me a patch and I can run them on my Windows boxes for you.

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3d11/tests: Add test for shader input register limits.

by Henri Verbeet

On 25 November 2016 at 12:17, Józef Kucia <jkucia(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Józef Kucia <jkucia(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > > The "ps_many_resources_code" shader bytecode is very big because texture > resources cannot be indexed and the loop is unrolled. > > --- > dlls/d3d11/tests/d3d11.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 221 insertions(+) > This doesn't work here. In particular: fixme:d3d_shader:print_glsl_info_log Info log received from GLSL shader #5: fixme:d3d_shader:print_glsl_info_log error: Too many fragment shader texture samplers ... fixme:d3d:context_bind_shader_resources Shader 0x18bb10 needs 21 samplers, but only 16 are supported.

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] d3d9/tests: Add test for occlusion query with result bigger than UINT32_MAX.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26917 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit device) === device.c:4392: Test failed: cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. device.c:4401: Test failed: Callback cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. === w1064 (64 bit device) === device.c:4392: Test failed: cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. device.c:4401: Test failed: Callback cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f.

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: ntdll/tests: The fpu exception offset is broken on 32-bit Windows 8 too.

by Marvin

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26914 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:551: Test failed: 42: Unexpected eip 0x2e0000/0x2e0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 002E0000 exception.c:551: Test failed: 42: Unexpected eip 0x77baed97/0x2e0001 === w7u (32 bit exception) === exception.c:551: Test failed: 42: Unexpected eip 0x300000/0x300001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00300000 exception.c:551: Test failed: 42: Unexpected eip 0x77cde34f/0x300001 === w1064 (32 bit exception) === An error occurred while waiting for the test to complete: network read timed out (wait2/connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9) The test VM has crashed, rebooted or lost connectivity (or the TestAgent server died) === w1064 (64 bit exception) === An error occurred while waiting for the test to complete: network read timed out (wait2/connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9) The test VM has crashed, rebooted or lost connectivity (or the TestAgent server died)

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: [PATCH] winspool: Use all Fields from DRIVER_INFO_8A when we add a Printer Driver.

by Huw Davies

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:49:40AM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > + if ((Level > 7) && diA->pszzColorProfiles) { > + len = MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, diA->pszzColorProfiles, -1, NULL, 0); > + diW.pszzColorProfiles = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, len * sizeof(WCHAR)); > + MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, diA->pszzColorProfiles, -1, diW.pszzColorProfiles, len); > + } This is a 'multi-sz' string, so you need the same handling as 'pDependentFiles' here. > + if ((Level > 7) && diA->pszInfPath) { > + len = MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, diA->pszInfPath, -1, NULL, 0); > + diW.pszInfPath = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, len * sizeof(WCHAR)); > + MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, diA->pszInfPath, -1, diW.pszInfPath, len); > + } > + > + if ((Level > 7) && diA->pszzCoreDriverDependencies) { > + len = MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, diA->pszzCoreDriverDependencies, -1, NULL, 0); > + diW.pszzCoreDriverDependencies = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, len * sizeof(WCHAR)); > + MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, diA->pszzCoreDriverDependencies, -1, diW.pszzCoreDriverDependencies, len); > + } The same goes for pszzCoreDriverDependencies. > if (Level > 7) { > - FIXME("level %u is incomplete\n", Level); > + diW.dwPrinterDriverAttributes = diA->dwPrinterDriverAttributes; > + diW.ftMinInboxDriverVerDate = diA->ftMinInboxDriverVerDate; > + diW.dwlMinInboxDriverVerVersion = diA->dwlMinInboxDriverVerVersion; > } > > res = AddPrinterDriverExW(nameW, Level, (LPBYTE) &diW, dwFileCopyFlags); > @@ -7018,6 +7061,11 @@ BOOL WINAPI AddPrinterDriverExA(LPSTR pName, DWORD Level, LPBYTE pDriverInfo, DW You're leaking pHelpFile. > HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszOEMUrl); > HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszHardwareID); > HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszProvider); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszPrintProcessor); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszVendorSetup); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszzColorProfiles); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszInfPath); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, diW.pszzCoreDriverDependencies); > > TRACE("=> %u with %u\n", res, GetLastError()); > return res;

Nov. 25, 2016

Re: Testing Direct3D

by Fabian Maurer

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:22:32 PM CET Stefan Dösinger wrote: > We're using real Windows machines, yeah. The driver is a big part of d3d, so > you want an AMD or Nvidia GPU, not virtualbox (which uses wined3d) or > vmware. Intel GPUs have known problems that break some games. AFAIK the wine TestBot is only running VMs, too. Is there any way to run a meaningful test without having my own windows machine?

Nov. 24, 2016