On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 12:13 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 08:40:26PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > This change was initially intended to only rename the error codes,
> > without functional changes. Would making change be considered a
> change
> > in functionality?
>
> How?
>
> The before-and-after asm should be the identical.
Yes but it reads differently. I just wanted to double check. I will make
this change, which keeps functionality but is written differently.
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
> With such changes second patch can be also changed to use __TRY/__FINALLY_CTX around "ret_addr = handler(0, frame);" file.
>
> What do you think about it?
Yeah, that looks cleaner. I need to make some tweaks, but once all my tests pass and I clean it up, I'll resend
Thanks
daniel
