June 2022 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

[PATCH 0/6] MR294: win32u: menu and def window proc conversion

by Jacek Caban (＠jacek)

-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/294

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] mfplat/tests: Merge and reorganize image format tests.

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117384 Your paranoid android. === w7u_el (32 bit report) === mfplat: 0858:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 72237D1C === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41289 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41317 bytes)

June 21, 2022

[PATCH v2 1/1] d3drm: Implement IDirect3DRMFrame{1/2/3}::SetSceneBackgroundImage

by Alistair Leslie-Hughes

From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> --- dlls/d3drm/d3drm_private.h | 1 + dlls/d3drm/frame.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/d3drm/d3drm_private.h b/dlls/d3drm/d3drm_private.h index 2fb6bafe951..31fdd4984a1 100644 --- a/dlls/d3drm/d3drm_private.h +++ b/dlls/d3drm/d3drm_private.h @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct d3drm_frame IDirect3DRMFrame3 IDirect3DRMFrame3_iface; IDirect3DRM *d3drm; LONG ref; + IUnknown *backgroundimage; struct d3drm_frame *parent; SIZE_T nb_children; SIZE_T children_size; diff --git a/dlls/d3drm/frame.c b/dlls/d3drm/frame.c index 5cc3ad585d4..9365e02cc47 100644 --- a/dlls/d3drm/frame.c +++ b/dlls/d3drm/frame.c @@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ static ULONG WINAPI d3drm_frame3_Release(IDirect3DRMFrame3 *iface) if (!refcount) { + if (frame->backgroundimage) + IUnknown_Release(frame->backgroundimage); d3drm_object_cleanup((IDirect3DRMObject *)&frame->IDirect3DRMFrame_iface, &frame->obj); for (i = 0; i < frame->nb_children; ++i) { @@ -2222,25 +2224,47 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI d3drm_frame1_SetSceneBackgroundDepth(IDirect3DRMFrame *ifa static HRESULT WINAPI d3drm_frame3_SetSceneBackgroundImage(IDirect3DRMFrame3 *iface, IDirect3DRMTexture3 *texture) { - FIXME("iface %p, texture %p stub!\n", iface, texture); + struct d3drm_frame *frame = impl_from_IDirect3DRMFrame3(iface); + IUnknown *unk = NULL; - return E_NOTIMPL; + TRACE("iface %p, texture %p\n", iface, texture); + + if (texture) + IDirect3DRMTexture3_QueryInterface(texture, &IID_IUnknown, (void**)&unk); + + if (frame->backgroundimage) + IUnknown_Release(frame->backgroundimage); + + frame->backgroundimage = unk; + + return S_OK; } static HRESULT WINAPI d3drm_frame2_SetSceneBackgroundImage(IDirect3DRMFrame2 *iface, IDirect3DRMTexture *texture) { - FIXME("iface %p, texture %p stub!\n", iface, texture); + struct d3drm_frame *frame = impl_from_IDirect3DRMFrame2(iface); + IUnknown *unk = NULL; - return E_NOTIMPL; + TRACE("iface %p, texture %p\n", iface, texture); + + if (texture) + IDirect3DRMTexture_QueryInterface(texture, &IID_IUnknown, (void**)&unk); + + if (frame->backgroundimage) + IUnknown_Release(frame->backgroundimage); + + frame->backgroundimage = unk; + + return S_OK; } static HRESULT WINAPI d3drm_frame1_SetSceneBackgroundImage(IDirect3DRMFrame *iface, IDirect3DRMTexture *texture) { - FIXME("iface %p, texture %p stub!\n", iface, texture); - - return E_NOTIMPL; + struct d3drm_frame *frame = impl_from_IDirect3DRMFrame(iface); + TRACE("iface %p, texture %p\n", iface, texture); + return d3drm_frame2_SetSceneBackgroundImage(&frame->IDirect3DRMFrame2_iface, texture); } static HRESULT WINAPI d3drm_frame3_SetSceneFogEnable(IDirect3DRMFrame3 *iface, BOOL enable) -- GitLab https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/289

June 21, 2022

[PATCH v2 0/1] MR289: d3drm: Implement IDirect3DRMFrame2::SetSceneBackgroundImage

by Alistair Leslie-Hughes (＠alesliehughes)

Signed-off-by: Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> -- v2: d3drm: Implement IDirect3DRMFrame{1/2/3}::SetSceneBackgroundImage https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/289

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] mfplat/tests: Remove duplicated tests.

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117382 Your paranoid android. === w7u_el (32 bit report) === mfplat: 0880:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 72117D1C === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41349 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41317 bytes)

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] mfplat/buffer: Fix the image copy function for IMC2/IMC4 buffers with odd height.

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117380 Your paranoid android. === w7u_el (32 bit report) === mfplat: 0868:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 72197D1C === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41289 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41317 bytes)

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] mfplat/buffer: Support YV12, I420 and IYUV image formats.

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117383 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41289 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41317 bytes)

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] mfplat/tests: Use a more unique pattern when testing image formats.

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117379 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w8adm (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w864 (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064v1507 (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064v1809 (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064 (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064_tsign (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w10pro64 (32 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w864 (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064v1507 (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064v1809 (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064 (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064_adm (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w1064_tsign (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w10pro64 (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) === mfplat: mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 8 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 8 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 8 row 9 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 70 instead of 70 at test 12 row 7 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 80 instead of 80 at test 12 row 8 column 0. mfplat.c:6077: Test succeeded inside todo block: Unexpected byte 90 instead of 90 at test 12 row 9 column 0. === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41870 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41858 bytes)

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] mfplat/buffer: Deduplicate common code between Lock2D() and Lock2DSize().

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117381 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41329 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (38258 bytes)

June 21, 2022

Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mfplat/buffer: Fix size for IMC2/IMC4 buffers with odd height.

by Marvin

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=117378 Your paranoid android. === w7u_el (32 bit report) === mfplat: 09f8:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 6DF97D1C === debian11 (32 bit report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (38305 bytes) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === Report validation errors: mfplat:mfplat prints too much data (41317 bytes)

June 21, 2022